Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/685,584

METHOD FOR PRODUCING HYDROGEN

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nitto Denko Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
401 granted / 616 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/22/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Initialed copies accompany this action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 6-10, 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sasson et al. (US 20180123153). Regarding claim 1, Sasson discloses a method for producing hydrogen, wherein hydrogen is generated from a formate using a metal catalyst in the presence of a solvent by a two-phase system reaction in which the solvent is present in a state where an organic phase (catalyst dissolved in one or more organic solvent) and an aqueous phase (aqueous potassium formate KHCO2) are separated. See the abstract, para 0012-13. Regarding claim 2, Sasson discloses a phase transfer catalyst is used for the reaction (para 0039). Regarding claim 3, Sasson discloses the phase transfer catalyst is a quaternary ammonium salt (para 0039). Regarding claim 4, Sasson discloses the metal catalyst contains at least one metal selected from ruthenium and iridium (para 0015). Regarding claim 6, Sasson discloses the formate is a potassium formate (para 0012) . Regarding claim 7, Sasson discloses the organic phase contains at least one selected from toluene, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, methylcyclohexane, and cyclopentyl methyl ether (para 0030-33). Regarding claims 8-10, Sasson discloses the formate is a potassium formate (para 0012). Regarding claims 12-14, Sasson discloses the organic phase contains at least one selected from toluene, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, methylcyclohexane, and cyclopentyl methyl ether (para 0030-33). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 5, 11 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sasson et al. (US 20180123153) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Filonenko et al. (ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1526 – 1530). Regarding claim 5, Sasson discloses a method for producing hydrogen described above and is incorporated herein by reference. Sasson discloses dehydrogenation reaction of aqueous formate is catalyzed effectively with the aid of a metal complex, such as ruthenium-containing complex (para 0008 and 0017) but does not disclose the claimed ruthenium complex. Filonenko discloses a high stability ruthenium complex (Ru PNP-pincer catalyst 1, abstract), that meets the claimed ruthenium complex. PNG media_image1.png 125 185 media_image1.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to replace the ruthenium complex in the method of Sasson with the ruthenium complex taught by Filonenko because one of ordinary skill in the art would have been able to carry out such a substitution, and the results of effectively dehydrogenation aqueous formate were reasonably predictable. Regarding claims 11 and 15, Sasson discloses the organic phase contains at least one selected from toluene, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, methylcyclohexane, and cyclopentyl methyl ether (para 0030-33). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAIDUNG D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5455. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 10a-3p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAIDUNG D NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 3/3/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583749
TITANIUM-ZIRCONIUM CO-DOPED CARBON-COATED LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION METHOD AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580094
OVERHEAD CONDUCTORS WITH HIGH-TEMPERATURE RESISTANT CURED COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575248
ZINC OXIDE NANOMATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12545834
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, ORGANIC COMPOUND, AND LIGHTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12521709
PROCESS FOR PURIFYING ORGANIC SOLVENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month