Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/685,620

ELEVATED BASE FOR A JACK

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Examiner
WUJCIAK, ALFRED J
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
869 granted / 1167 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1196
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1167 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is the final Office Action for the serial number 18/685,620, ELEVATED BASE FOR A JACK, filed on 2/22/24. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-12 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication # 2009/0242140 to Gates. Gates teaches a base unit comprising a main body portion (200) having a base (220) and a support surface (210) elevated above the base. The base unit includes an extension member (250) comprising a body (254, 252) formed separate from the main body portion, the body of the extension member being configured to be mounted on the support surface of the main body portion. The extension member having an upper surface (253). Wherein the support surface of the main body is shaped to engage with an undersurface of the extension member to secure the extension member in position on the main body portion. Wherein the upper surface of the extension member is configured to receive an insert mat upon which the jack (140) is supported on. The upper surface of the extension member has a recess formed therein to receive a base of a jack (140) thereon. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gates in view of US Patent Application Publication # 2005/0017223 to Lucas. Gates teaches the base unit but fails to teach the base unit includes an insert mat. Lucas teaches the insert mat (10). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have added the insert mat to Gates’s base unit as taught by Lucas to improve stability for supporting the jack within the base unit (section 0004 in Lucas’s invention). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 16 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 11-16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALFRED J WUJCIAK whose telephone number is (571)272-6827. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALFRED J. WUJCIAK Examiner Art Unit 3632 /ALFRED J WUJCIAK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632 12/2/25
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
May 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601191
PROP-BRACE COUPLER FOR CONSTRUCTION PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12587132
PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE CLAMP ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571342
Engine-Generator Set
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571497
MOUNTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571495
DISPLAY MOUNTING SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1167 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month