Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/685,841

BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 22, 2024
Priority
Jun 10, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0070537 +1 more
Examiner
GODO, OLATUNJI A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
969 granted / 1129 resolved
+25.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1155
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1129 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claims 1, 3, 9, 10, 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rhee et al. (US20220021073). 2. Regarding claims 1, 3, 9, 10, 14, Rhee teaches a battery pack (see Figs. below), comprising: a plurality of cell units stacked in a first direction, each cell unit including a cell stack including one battery cell or a plurality of battery cells stacked and a cell cover accommodating the cell stack; and a pack case comprising a pack tray on which the plurality of cell units is seated and a pack cover covering the plurality of cell units and coupled to the pack tray, wherein the cell cover has a top open portion and the pack cover has a fire extinguishing material input zone to feed a fire extinguishing material into the cell cover through the top open portion of the cell cover, and wherein at least a portion of the fire extinguishing material input zone is configured to be heat-melted so that the fire extinguishing material is fed into the cell cover (see Figs. below). PNG media_image1.png 752 960 media_image1.png Greyscale 3. Regarding claims 9 and 10, Rhee teaches wherein the cell cover covers both sides of the cell stack in a widthwise direction of the cell stack and a bottom of the cell stack (sealing the electrode assembly on three sides thereof, may be a component configured to seal the electrode assembly by overlapping and bonding the pouch-type member on three sides of the electrode assembly, usually an upper side and both lateral sides except one side that is a lower side, in a state in which the electrode assembly is accommodated in the pouch-type member. The can-type member, accommodating the electrode assembly therein while sealing the electrode assembly on one side thereof, may be a component configured to seal the electrode assembly by overlapping and bonding the can-type member on one side of the electrode assembly, usually an upper surface except for three sides that are a lower side and both lateral sides, in a state in which the electrode assembly is accommodated in the can-type member [0050]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claims 4, 11, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rhee et al. (US20220021073) as applied to claim 1 in view of Kim et al. (US 20240226621 PCT filed 5/10/2022). 5. Regarding claims 4, 11, 15, the complete discussion of Rhee as applied to claim 1 is incorporated herein. Rhee teaches a plurality of secondary battery cells may be mounted and installed as a battery module in an electric vehicle [0005]. However, they are silent about the limitations of claims 4 and 11. 6. Kim teaches wherein the fire extinguishing material is cooling water, and wherein the pack cover includes a flow channel in which the cooling water flows inside (The fire-extinguishing system may use an indirect injection method, in which water or fire-extinguishing chemical is injected close to a battery or onto an entire region, on which the battery is installed, in the event of fire of the battery [0004]; As the fire-extinguishing chemical, all commonly used fire-extinguishing chemicals such as gas-based fire-extinguishing chemicals such as HFC-23/HFC- 125/HFC227ea, CF3CF2C(O)CF(CF3)2, and water may be applied [0066]). 7. Kim teaches wherein the battery pack includes a busbar frame assembly including a busbar electrically connected to an electrode lead of the battery cell, and disposed on each of a front side and a rear side of the cell stack in a lengthwise direction of the cell stack and coupled to the cell cover (Here, a busbar holder 31b may be provided inside the case 31, and the busbar holder 31b may communicate with the through-part 31a. The busbar holder 31b may be disposed at a position corresponding to the vent hole of each battery cell 33 [0078]). 8. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Rhee with Kim’s teaching for the benefit of the fire-extinguishing part further comprising a pipe fitting member provided on a path through which the fire-extinguishing chemical supplied with respect to the battery rack (abstract). 9. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rhee et al. (US20220021073) as applied to claim 1 in view of Kogami et al. (US 20220255182 PCT filed 6/15/2020). 10. Regarding claim 12, the complete discussion of Rhee as applied to claim 1 is incorporated herein. 11. Kogami teaches a thermal insulation pad between each of the cell units of the plurality of cell units (Stopper 7 is disposed in a gap between adjacent battery cells 1 [0062]; Stopper 7 preferably is made of a hybrid material of an inorganic powder such as silica aerogel and a fibrous reinforcing material, and has an integral structure with heat insulating layer 5 [0064]) for the benefit of separator 2 including heat insulating layer 5 and stopper 7, having excellent heat insulation characteristics and thus can thermally insulate adjacent battery cells 1 from each other in an ideal state [0064]. 12. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Rhee with Kogami’s teachings for the benefit of separator 2 including heat insulating layer 5 and stopper 7, having excellent heat insulation characteristics and thus can thermally insulate adjacent battery cells 1 from each other in an ideal state [0064]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 5-8, 13 are allowable over the prior art of record. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLATUNJI GODO whose telephone number is (571)272-3104. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Smith can be reached on 571-272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLATUNJI A GODO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706337
SHAPED ELECTRODE FOR ARRESTING ELECTRODE MOVEMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695129
BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695106
FUEL CELL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING INERT GAS FOR A FUEL CELL SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689080
BATTERY COVER PLATE, BATTERY, AND POWER SYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689084
BATTERY PACK
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1129 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month