Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/686,200

PHOTOCURABLE MATERIAL AND IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 03, 2024
Priority
Aug 26, 2021 — JP 2021-137824 +1 more
Examiner
MCCLENDON, SANZA L
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
DEXerials Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
999 granted / 1240 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1264
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1240 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 06/03/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the finding of lack of unity if premature based on the lack of a full search of the invention. This is not found persuasive as evidenced by the search report issued by the Chinese Patent Office dated 3/10/2026. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Interpretation The limitation “wherein the photocurable material of a difference between a refractive index of a photocured product of the (meth)acrylic acid ester component as the component (a) and a refractive index of the plasticizer component as the component (b) is 0.02 or less” in claim 1, lines 8-10 is being interpreted as “wherein the photocurable material has a difference between the refractive index of a photocured product of the (meth)acrylic acid ester component (a) and the refractive index of the plasticizer component (b) is 0.02 or less.” The limitation “for forming a transparent resin layer of an image display device, in which an image display panel and a front panel are laminated via the transparent resin layer” is considered an intended use. A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. The photocurable material does not depended upon being a transparent resin layer or an image display device. The photocurable material alone is fully capable of being an adhesive for laminating non-transparent substrates, such as wood or metal. The limitation “when the photocurable material is used for forming a dam portion in a case where the transparent resin layer is composed of a fill portion present at a position corresponding to a display portion of the image display panel and the dam portion surrounding an outer periphery of the fill portion” is a future intended limitation. Additionally, it appears, as written, the limitation is optional, i.e., “in the case….”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Hara et al (JP2018-140601). Hara sets forth manufacturing of laminates and photocurable composition for use in such methods. Said photocurable compositions comprise (A) a (meth) acrylate resin, (B) a photopolymerization initiator, and (C) a plasticizer—see [0008]. Hara sets forth the (meth) acrylate resin comprises from 5-60 % by mass of a monofunctional monomer and 10 to 70 % by mass of a photocurable (meth) acrylate resin, polymer, or oligomer—see [0036] and [0041]- [0046]. Regarding claims 1-4: Hara sets forth in example 6 a photocurable composition comprising 50 parts by weight of a polyurethane (meth) acrylate oligomer (UV3700, RI:1.4611); 10 parts by weight of M-101A (monofunctional acrylate monomer); 40 parts of a plasticizer (P-3000, RI: 1.4494); and 1 part by weight of a photoinitiator, wherein the cured product has a refractive index of 1.4614. Said the cured photocurable resin material has a difference between the cured product (1.4614) and the refractive index of the plasticizer (P-3000, RI:1.4494) is 0.0117—see example 6, Table 1. Therefore, claim 1 is anticipated. The resin composition is exposed to radiation to cure the (meth) acrylate portion of the resin composition in the presence of a photoinitiator in an amount of 1 wt. % per (meth) acrylate reactive components (claim 2). The combination of UV3700 (difunctional acrylate oligomer) and M-101A (mono-functional acrylate monomer)—claims 3-4. Regarding claim 9: Hara sets forth the resin composition may further include a filler material, such as inorganic fine particles to help adjust the refractive index of the resin composition—see [0052]. Thus, claim 9 is sufficiently set forth. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Hara does not expressly teach and/or render obvious the refractive index difference between the oligomer and monomers in component (a) is 0.02 or less. Regarding claims 6-8: while Hara sets forth said plasticizers can be used in combinations; Hara fails expressly teach and/or render the proviso as set forth in claims 6-8. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANZA L MCCLENDON whose telephone number is (571)272-1074. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heidi Riviere-Kelley can be reached at 571-270-1831. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANZA L. McCLENDON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765 SMc
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679953
REINFORCED FLUOROPOLYMER
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674068
Radiation Curable Ink Jet Composition
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668697
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS USEFUL FOR FORMING SINTERED ARTICLES
5y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668709
PHOTOCURABLE COMPOSITION, INKJET INK COMPOSITION, ACTIVE ENERGY RAY-CURABLE INK COMPOSITION, CURED PRODUCT, AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12655254
PHOTOCURABLE MALEIMIDE RESIN COMPOSITION
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1240 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month