Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/686,296

SWITCHING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SWITCHING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 23, 2024
Examiner
CAROC, LHEIREN MAE ANGLO
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Eaton Intelligent Power Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
769 granted / 990 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1023
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 990 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “comprises”, “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because the dashes at the beginning of lines 2-6 and 8 should be deleted. Claim 16 is objected to because “held” on line 2 should be changed to “hold”. Claim 24 is objected to because the dashes at the beginning of lines 4 and 5 should be deleted. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 14-17, 20-23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tumu et al. [Tumu hereinafter, US 9,842,708]. In regard to claim 14, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] a switching device, comprising a first and a second fixed contact [116], a contact bridge [114], a first and a second movable contact [118] arranged at the contact bridge [114], at least one contact spring [138], a contact bridge carrier [112] which is movable, is coupled to the contact bridge [114] via the at least one contact spring [138] and comprises a carrier tip [140], a lever arm connected to the contact bridge and comprising a tip [at 144], wherein that the tip of the lever arm is configured to irreversibly engage with the carrier tip [140] of the contact bridge carrier [112] in case of a short circuit, wherein the tip of the lever arm is continuously held in a fixed position by the carrier tip [140] of the contact bridge carrier [112] after a short circuit, and wherein the switching device is configured such that the fixed position cannot be released after a short circuit. In regard to claim 15, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the tip [at 144] of the lever arm and the carrier tip [140] of the contact bridge carrier [112] are configured to provide a latching between the lever arm and the contact bridge carrier [112] in case of a short circuit. In regard to claim 16, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the lever arm and the contact bridge carrier [112] are configured to held the contact bridge [114] in a switched-off state after a short circuit. In regard to claim 17, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the switching device is free of a mechanism to set the contact bridge [114] in a switched-on state after the short circuit. In regard to claim 20, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the switching device comprises a first terminal contact [104] at which the first fixed contact [116] is attached and a second terminal contact [106] at which the second fixed contact [116] is attached. In regard to claim 21, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the switching device is configured that a current flowing in case of a short circuit through the first fixed contact [116], the first movable contact [118], the contact bridge [114], the second movable contact [118] and the second fixed contact [116] causes a movement of the contact bridge [114] relative to the contact bridge carrier [112] in case of a short circuit. In regard to claim 22, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the switching device comprises an armature [126], wherein the armature [126] is movable and is coupled to the contact bridge carrier [112], and wherein the switching device is configured that the movement of the contact bridge [114] relative to the contact bridge carrier [112] in case of a short circuit starts before the armature [126] starts to move. In regard to claim 23, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the lever arm is configured to be bended towards the carrier tip [140] by the movement of the contact bridge [114] in case of a short circuit. In regard to claim 26, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] a method for operating a switching device, wherein the switching device comprises a first and a second fixed contact [116], a contact bridge [114], a first and a second movable contact [118] arranged at the contact bridge [114], at least one contact spring [138], a contact bridge carrier [112] which is movable, comprises a carrier tip [140] and is coupled to the contact bridge [114] via the at least one contact spring [138] and a lever arm connected to the contact bridge and comprising a tip [at 144], wherein that the method comprises: irreversibly engaging of the tip with the carrier tip [140] in case of a short circuit, wherein the tip of the lever arm is continuously held in a fixed position by the carrier tip [140] of the contact bridge carrier [112] after a short circuit, and wherein the fixed position cannot be released after a short circuit. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tumu et al. [Tumu hereinafter, US 9,842,708] in view of Nishide et al. [Nishide hereinafter, US 2022/0328260]. In regard to claim 18, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14. Tumu does not disclose that the first and the second movable contact are made of a metal and have a thickness in a range between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm. Nishide teaches [in Fig. 1, claim 1, and par. 0104] that the first and the second movable contact are made of a metal and have a thickness in a range between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to replace the movable contacts of Tumu with the movable contacts taught by Nishide in order to provide a switching device that “can perform reliable on/off control while coping with problems of arc discharge and heat generation in a contact pair” [Nishide, par. 0084]. In regard to claim 19, Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14. Tumu does not disclose that the first and the second fixed contact are made of a metal and have a thickness in a range between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm. Nishide teaches [in Fig. 1, claim 1, and par. 0104] that the first and the second fixed contact are made of a metal and have a thickness in a range between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to replace the fixed contacts of Tumu with the fixed contacts taught by Nishide in order to provide a switching device that “can perform reliable on/off control while coping with problems of arc discharge and heat generation in a contact pair” [Nishide, par. 0084]. Claim 24 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tumu et al. [Tumu hereinafter, US 9,842,708] in view of Friedrichsen et al. [Friedrichsen hereinafter, US 2022/0044896]. Tumu disclose [in Figs. 1-7C] the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the contact bridge [114] is configured to perform a rotational movement in case of a short circuit. Tumu does not disclose that the contact bridge is configured to perform a linear movement at a transition from a switched-off state to a switched-on state of the switching device, and at a transition from a switched-on state to a switched-off state of the switching device. Friedrichsen teaches [in Fig. 2 and par. 0020] that the contact bridge [100] is configured to perform a linear movement at a transition from a switched-off state to a switched-on state of the switching device, and at a transition from a switched-on state to a switched-off state of the switching device. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to provide a contact bridge that is configured to perform a linear movement at a transition from a switched-off state to a switched-on state of the switching device, and at a transition from a switched-on state to a switched-off state of the switching device in order to “reduce the welding tendency of the switching contacts” [Friedrichsen [par. 0020] Claim 25 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tumu et al. [Tumu hereinafter, US 9,842,708]. Tumu discloses [in Figs. 1-7C the switching device according to claim 14, wherein the contact bridge [114] includes a first leg end, a second leg end and an intermediate section, wherein the first movable contact [118] is attached to the first leg end, wherein the second movable contact [118] is attached to the second leg end, and wherein the intermediate section connects the first leg end to the second leg end and is connected to the lever arm. Tumu does not disclose that the contact bridge is configured in a C-form or U-form. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have used any various shape, since selection and use of any known equivalent shape would have been within the level of ordinary skill in the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LHEIREN MAE A CAROC whose telephone number is (571)272-2730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LHEIREN MAE A CAROC/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603237
PUSH BUTTON FOR ACTUATING SWITCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597571
BUTTON APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592351
PYROTECHNIC CIRCUIT BREAKER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586740
STACK KEY STRUCTURE AND BALANCE-SHAFT SEAT THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578802
ELECTRICAL KEY SUPPORT MEMBRANE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+13.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month