Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/686,402

NITROGEN-CONTAINING DERIVATIVES OF SALINOMYCIN, SYNTHESIS AND USES THEREOF

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Feb 23, 2024
Priority
Sep 03, 2021 — EU 21306210.2 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, ERIC
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Adam Mickiewicz University
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
73 granted / 104 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
138
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 104 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Per Applicant’s amendment to the claims, submitted on 05/18/1016, claims 5-8 and 12-16 are amended. Currently, claims 1-8, 10, and 12-19 are pending in the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Second Paragraph - Withdrawn Rejection of claims 5, 8, and 12-13: In light of Applicant’s amendment to the claims, the rejections of claims 5, 8, and 12-13 are hereby withdrawn. Claims 5 and 8 have been amended to remove the indicated indefinite language. Claims 12-13 have been amended to now recite a method rather than a medicament, rendering the previous rejections moot. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Second Paragraph - Maintained Claims 6 and 14-16 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Rejection of claims 6, 14-16: Applicant’s amendments are not sufficient to overcome the outstanding rejections, the rejections are hereby maintained. With regards to claim 6, the claim still contains an instance of the term “preferably”, which constitutes indefinite language. With regards to claim 14, the claim has been amended to depend upon the method of claim 12 “wherein said medicament is a medicament for preventing cancer metastasis and/or for preventing cancer recurrence and/or for decreasing resistance to a chemotherapy in a subject”. The recitation of the instant claim does not add any further material structure to the medicament being administered in claim 12, and only describes an intended use or outcome. Accordingly, a person of ordinary skill would not reasonably be able to understand the metes and bounds of the claim. With regards to claim 15, the amendment is not sufficient to overcome the outstanding rejection because the claim still contains an instance of the indefinite term “preferably”. With regards to claim 16, the claim has been amended to depend upon the method of claim 12 “wherein said medicament is a medicament for preventing cancer metastasis and/or for preventing cancer recurrence and/or for decreasing resistance to a chemotherapy in a subject”. The recitation of the instant claim does not add any further material structure to the medicament being administered in claim 12, and only describes an intended use or outcome. Accordingly, a person of ordinary skill would not reasonably be able to understand the metes and bounds of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 – Withdrawn Rejection of claims 1-8, 10, 15, and 17-19: Applicant’s arguments are persuasive. Applicant provides that the compounds of the instant claims provide an unexpected result in the form of greater activity against cancer stem cells. As indicated in the previous Office Action, the compound found in Mehrpour page 11, and the additionally disclosed compound AM17 were provided as an obvious combination in forming a salinomycin derivative having epi conformation at C20. However, Mehrpour does not teach or suggest that the C20 conformational change results in superior selectivity for cancer stem cells, and in particular, the HMLER cells identified in the disclosure and newly disclosed documents. Double Patenting – Withdrawn Rejection of claims 1-8, 10, and 12-19: Applicant’s arguments are persuasive, the rejections are hereby withdrawn. The claims of the ‘298 patent provide a situation wherein said claims dominate the claims of the instant application due to the recitation of “diastereomers” thereof. However, the inventions of the instant application are drawn to C20 epimers and derivatives thereof of salinomycin, which the claims of the ‘298 patent do not implicate. Conclusion Claims 6 and 14-16 are rejected. Claims 1-5, 7-8, 10, 12-13, and 17-19 are in condition for allowance. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7854. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey S Lundgren can be reached at (571) 272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
May 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12643881
BICYCLIC AMINE CDK12 INHIBITORS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636288
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
6y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637440
NOVEL AMIDE DERIVATIVE USEFUL AS DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE 2 INHIBITOR, AND USE THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622895
ANTI-NEURODEGENERATIVE COMBINATIONS AND USE FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
5y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617783
HETEROCYCLIC GLP-1R AGONISTS
1y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+23.6%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 104 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month