Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/686,776

PISTON FOR CENTRIFUGATION AND CENTRIFUGATION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 26, 2024
Priority
Aug 26, 2021 — RE 10- 2021-0112893 +2 more
Examiner
LIU, SHUYI S
Art Unit
3781
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Bslrest Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
354 granted / 481 resolved
+3.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
526
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
47.4%
+7.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 481 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
NON-FINAL ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings were received on 26 February 2024. These drawings are acceptable. Specification The specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware of in the specification. The abstract of the disclosure is acceptable. The title of the invention is acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 13-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites “a first passage connecting the first opening to the hollow part” (line 6), and “wherein the first passage is positioned between the inner body surface and the outer valve surface” (line 10). These two recitations describe the first passage as a conduit through the piston body, or as a clearance adjacent to the valve, and it is unclear which physical space “the first passage” refers to or whether they are intended to be the same space. Claim 13 also recites “wherein the outer valve surface defines the first passage and a second passage” (line 9). It is unclear how the first passage is structurally differentiated from the second passage. Furthermore, claim 13 recites “a gap between the inner body surface and the outer valve surface” (line 15). This description has already been used for “the first passage”. It is unclear if “the first passage” and the “gap” refer to the same space “between the inner body surface and the outer valve surface” or different features. If they refer to the same structure, consistent terminology should be used. The use of a confusing variety of terms for the same thing should not be permitted. See MPEP 608.01(o). Claim 23 recites substantially the same language and is rejected for the same reasons. Claims 14-22 and 24 are rejected for the same reasons due to their dependency upon claims 13 and 23. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-24 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The prior art does not teach or suggest a piston for centrifugation comprising a valve having an outer valve surface with a recess part formed therein, in combination with a first inner sealing part positioned at the recess part, in contact with the inner body surface of the piston body, and configured to both space the outer valve surface apart from the inner body surface and seal a gap between the inner body surface and the outer valve surface at a time of centrifugation, as recited in claim 13. In particular, WO 2019/050248 (Lee, corresponding to U.S. Patent No. 11,661,578) discloses a piston body/valve structure including a clearance formed between an outer surface of a valve and an inner surface the piston body that defines a second flow path 2116, but does not disclose a recess formed in that outer valve surface. The inner sealing member 240 is instead seated in a groove formed in the piston body’s own inner surface, not in a recess of the valve, for the purpose of retaining the valve within the piston body, rather than spacing the valve from, and sealing it against, the inner body surface during centrifugation. WO 2019/151705 (Lee, corresponding to U.S. Patent No. 11,623,228) discloses a recess 144 or 145 and resilient member 171 or 172 structure on a valve component 141, but the recess is formed in an inner surface of the valve body, and is configured to seal against a separate internal guide, rather than in an outer surface of the valve configured to seal against the piston body’s inner body surface as claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHUYI S LIU whose telephone number is (571)272-0496. The examiner can normally be reached MON - FRI 9:30AM - 2:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Claire Wang can be reached at 571-270-1051. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shuyi S. Liu/Examiner, Art Unit 1774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734284
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING CELL PROCESSING PROTOCOLS
5y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728427
CENTRIFUGAL PISTON AND CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATION DEVICE HAVING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722163
Interface Detection And Control Using A Photodetector Array
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12667849
CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATOR FOR SEPARATING A LIQUID MIXTURE WITH POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT PUMPS RESPECTIVELY DOWNSTREAM OF OUTLETS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654176
BAFFLE ASSEMBLIES, NOZZLES, AND RELATED METHODS FOR SOLID DISCHARGES OF CENTRIFUGE SEPARATORS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.4%)
3y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 481 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month