Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/687,011

GLASS COMPOSITIONS AND GLASS LAMINATE ARTICLES COMPRISING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Priority
Aug 31, 2021 — provisional 63/238,814 +2 more
Examiner
COLGAN, LAUREN ROBINSON
Art Unit
1784
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Corning Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
636 granted / 910 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
959
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 910 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-2, 4, 6-9, 11, 13, 15-19, 22-27 and 29 in the reply filed on February 26, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 30-39 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected article and method, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claim(s) 1-2, 7-8, 11, 13, 15-16, 18-19, 22-27 and 29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1 and a2) as being anticipated by Aitken (USPub20180084016). Claim 1: Claim 1 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 SiO2 50-80 62.18 63.5 63 62.95 Al2O3 5-15 11.38 10.7 11 10.3 B2O3 10-25 10.76 10.3 10.2 11.6 Li2O ≥0 0 0 0 0 Na2O ≥0 1.8 0 0 0 K2O ≥0 0 2.3 2.4 1.8 Rb2O ≥0 0 0 0 0 Cs2O ≥0 0 0 0 0 MgO 1.5-5 4.58 4.4 5.5 4.13 CaO 4-12 5.48 5.2 6.1 4.6 SrO 0.5-5 3.74 3.5 1.8 0.1 R2O (ΣLi2O, Na2O, K2O, Rb2O, Cs2O) 0.1-15 1.8 2.3 2.4 1.8 Claim 2: Claim 2 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 R2O 0.25-12 1.8 2.3 2.4 1.8 Claim 7: Claim 7 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 Al2O3 6-13 11.38 10.7 11 10.3 Claim 8: Claim 8 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 Al2O3 7-11 10.7 11 10.3 Claim 11: Claim 11 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 CaO 4.5-10 5.48 5.2 6.1 4.6 Claim 13: Claim 13 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 SrO 0.75-4 3.74 3.5 1.8 1.43 Claim 15: Claim 15 Ex 49 BaO >0-5 3.1 Claim 16: Claim 16 Ex 49 BaO >0-4 3.1 Claim 18: Claim 18 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 SnO2 >0-0.5 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.1 Claim 19: Claim 19 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 SnO2 >0-0.25 0.08 0.1 0.1 0.1 Claim 22: Claim 22 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 SiO2 55-75 62.18 63.5 63 62.95 Claim 23: Claim 23 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 SiO2 60-70 62.18 63.5 63 62.95 Claim 24: Given that Aitken’s glass composition meets that claimed, one skilled in the art would reasonably conclude the same functionalities/capabilities (i.e. being phase separable as claimed) (MPEP 2112). Claim 25: Claim 25 Ex 29 Ex 46 Ex 48 Ex 49 Liq. Visc 10-15000kP 516,159.7P (i.e. 516.1597kP) 396, 638.1P (396.6381kP) 822,000P (822kP) 5,233,000P (5,233 kP) Claim 26: Given that Aitken’s glass composition meets that claimed, one skilled in the art would reasonably conclude the same properties (MPEP 2112). Claim 27: Given that Aitken’s glass composition meets that claimed, one skilled in the art would reasonably conclude the same properties (MPEP 2112). Claim 29: Given that Aitken’s glass composition meets that claimed, one skilled in the art would reasonably conclude the same properties (MPEP 2112). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claim(s) 4, 6, 9, and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aitken (USPub20100084016). Claim 4 and 6: While Aitken’s Examples may not provide for a B2O3 amount as required by claims 4 and 6, Aitken does allow for B2O3 content to be 7-15, 9-15 and even greater than 11-15mol% (0035, 0042, 0049) which overlaps the contents claimed (MPEP 2144.05). Claim 9: While Aitken’s Examples may not provide for a MgO amount as required by claim 9, Aitken does allow for their MgO content to be 1-8mol% (0078) which overlaps the contents claimed (MPEP 2144.05). Claim 17: While Aitken’s Examples may not provide for a BaO amount as required by claim 17, Aitken does teach that BaO content can be in amounts of <0.1mol% (0087) or ≤0.5mol% (0062) which overlaps the contents claimed (MPEP 2144.05). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAUREN ROBINSON COLGAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3474. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 9AM to 5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LAUREN ROBINSON COLGAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 1784 /LAUREN R COLGAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600666
GLASS ARTICLE HAVING AN ANTI-REFLECTIVE COATING
4y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600663
SUBSTRATE, LIQUID CRYSTAL ANTENNA AND HIGH-FREQUENCY DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594744
INTERLAYER FILM FOR LAMINATED GLASS, AND LAMINATED GLASS
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591274
GLASS SUBSTRATE FOR FLEXIBLE DISPLAY AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585046
Heatable Windshield
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 7m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 910 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month