Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/687,023

CORE-SHELL TEMPLATE MOLECULE/PARTICLE FOR TECHNIQUE FOR HIGH-YIELD FORMATION OF PORES ON SUBSTRATE

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Priority
Aug 27, 2021 — JP 2021-139397 +1 more
Examiner
FERRE, ALEXANDRE F
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
National University Corporation Kobe University
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
430 granted / 728 resolved
-5.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
799
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
57.2%
+17.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 728 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1, 2, 17, 44 and 45 in the reply filed on 12/18/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 20-22, 24-25, 29-31, 40-42, 48-49, 51 and 56 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the limitation “core” in line 4 of the claim appears to be repeated. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 17 and 44-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 contains the limitation “the particle core includes (A1) a particle core core”. It is unclear how the “particle core (A)” referred to previously in the claim can contain an a “particle core (A1)” or how these structures are distinct. Furthermore, it is unclear further on in the claim if “the particle core” refers to the structure (A) or (A1). Claim 1 further contains the limitation “the sensor”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation. Claim 1 further contains the limitation “the binding group”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation. Claim 1 further contains the limitation “the molecules of the functional group-containing moiety”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation. While the claim refers to “a first functional group” and “a second functional group”, neither of these limitations contain an explicit reference to a molecule or moiety” Due to the divergent potential interpretations, the metes and bounds of the claim are unclear and the claim is therefore indefinite. Regarding claim 2, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claims 2, 17 and 44-45 are further rejected as being dependent on claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 17 and 44-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harwanegg et al. (U.S. App. Pub. No. 2019/0079083) (cited in the IDS filed on 05/07/2024). Regarding claim 1, Harwanegg et al. discloses an antigen array containing antigen-coated beads fixed to a solid support material. (Abstract). The beads (i.e. particle core) (par. [0047-[0050]) are surface modified with functional groups bound to the bead surface such as COOH or NH2 groups (par. [0119], [0147] and [0323]) which are capable of binding to the core and to the antigen material using moieties of the surface modifier. (par. [0137]-[0147] and [0323]). The functional groups therefor include the B-1 functional group capable of binding to the particle core and the B-2 group which would be the antigen and the particle and modifier are integrated through the bonding of the antigen to the functional group on the particle surface. Regarding claim 2, Hawanegg et al. discloses using the array on a solid support material. (i.e substrate) (Abstract). The modifiers can be used along or in combination and a polymerizable (can be crosslinked and may include amino or carboxyl groups. (par. [0323]). Regarding claim 17, Hawanegg et al. discloses using the array on a solid support material. (i.e substrate) (Abstract). Regarding claims 44-45, Hawanegg et al. discloses using the array on a solid support material. (i.e substrate) (Abstract). The support material may include polymer sheets or membranes as layers on a surface. (par. [0171]-[0174]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDRE F FERRE whose telephone number is (571)270-5763. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8 am to 4 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 5712721490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDRE F FERRE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 02/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Sep 01, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766597
SILVER POWDER AND METHOD OF PRODUCING SILVER POWDER
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760203
WATER-BASED HOT-MELT ADHESIVE AND MEDICAL PAPER COATING WITH WATER-BASED HOT MELT ADHESIVE
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12747519
MICROPOROUS POLYETHYLENE FILAMENTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744141
COIL COMPONENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735576
PLATE-LIKE PVD ALUMINUM PIGMENT WITH A PROTECTIVE ENCAPSULATION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PLATE-LIKE PVD ALUMINIUM PIGMENT WITH A PROTECTIVE ENCAPSULATION
6y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+20.1%)
3y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 728 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month