Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/687,023

CORE-SHELL TEMPLATE MOLECULE/PARTICLE FOR TECHNIQUE FOR HIGH-YIELD FORMATION OF PORES ON SUBSTRATE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
FERRE, ALEXANDRE F
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
National University Corporation Kobe University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
415 granted / 697 resolved
-5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
759
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 697 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1, 2, 17, 44 and 45 in the reply filed on 12/18/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 20-22, 24-25, 29-31, 40-42, 48-49, 51 and 56 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the limitation “core” in line 4 of the claim appears to be repeated. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 17 and 44-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 contains the limitation “the particle core includes (A1) a particle core core”. It is unclear how the “particle core (A)” referred to previously in the claim can contain an a “particle core (A1)” or how these structures are distinct. Furthermore, it is unclear further on in the claim if “the particle core” refers to the structure (A) or (A1). Claim 1 further contains the limitation “the sensor”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation. Claim 1 further contains the limitation “the binding group”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation. Claim 1 further contains the limitation “the molecules of the functional group-containing moiety”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation. While the claim refers to “a first functional group” and “a second functional group”, neither of these limitations contain an explicit reference to a molecule or moiety” Due to the divergent potential interpretations, the metes and bounds of the claim are unclear and the claim is therefore indefinite. Regarding claim 2, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claims 2, 17 and 44-45 are further rejected as being dependent on claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 17 and 44-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Harwanegg et al. (U.S. App. Pub. No. 2019/0079083) (cited in the IDS filed on 05/07/2024). Regarding claim 1, Harwanegg et al. discloses an antigen array containing antigen-coated beads fixed to a solid support material. (Abstract). The beads (i.e. particle core) (par. [0047-[0050]) are surface modified with functional groups bound to the bead surface such as COOH or NH2 groups (par. [0119], [0147] and [0323]) which are capable of binding to the core and to the antigen material using moieties of the surface modifier. (par. [0137]-[0147] and [0323]). The functional groups therefor include the B-1 functional group capable of binding to the particle core and the B-2 group which would be the antigen and the particle and modifier are integrated through the bonding of the antigen to the functional group on the particle surface. Regarding claim 2, Hawanegg et al. discloses using the array on a solid support material. (i.e substrate) (Abstract). The modifiers can be used along or in combination and a polymerizable (can be crosslinked and may include amino or carboxyl groups. (par. [0323]). Regarding claim 17, Hawanegg et al. discloses using the array on a solid support material. (i.e substrate) (Abstract). Regarding claims 44-45, Hawanegg et al. discloses using the array on a solid support material. (i.e substrate) (Abstract). The support material may include polymer sheets or membranes as layers on a surface. (par. [0171]-[0174]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEXANDRE F FERRE whose telephone number is (571)270-5763. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8 am to 4 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 5712721490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDRE F FERRE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 02/20/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600872
COATING COMPOSITION, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590190
COATED RESIN PARTICLES AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING COATED RESIN PARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589534
POLYPROPYLENE-BASED RESIN EXPANDED BEADS AND MOLDED ARTICLE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577405
ALUMINA POWDER AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND STACK AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569910
MAGNETIC CORE, MAGNETIC COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+19.7%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month