Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/687,123

RADAR SYSTEM FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 27, 2024
Examiner
DOZE, PETER DAVON
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Opmobility SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
18 granted / 22 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
55
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 22 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Stephan (WO 2020043633 A1) [cited from pdf] in view of Belot (EP 3734749A1) [cited from pdf] in view of Izadian (US 20160047907 A1). Regarding claim 1 Stephan discloses A radar system for a motor vehicle (Paragraph 0001, "motor vehicles, equipped with a directional antenna to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave in a desired direction"; Paragraph 0003, "We also know of vehicles equipped with radar-type devices") comprising: an electronic unit configured to transmit and receive an electromagnetic wave in a predetermined frequency range (Claim 9, “the transceiver (50) is capable of emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves at various frequencies, in particular 77 GHz”); a first directional antenna arranged on a first body part of the motor vehicle (Paragraph 0014, “The invention aims to remedy the aforementioned drawbacks by providing a motor vehicle body part comprising at least one directional antenna, capable of emitting and/or receiving an electromagnetic wave in a given direction from a large area (related to the size of the body part itself)”) and comprising a first reflective cavity reflecting electromagnetic waves wherein a first metasurface is positioned (Figure 2 elements 80, 70, 60; Paragraph 0028, "The wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver 50 is almost totally reflected by the adaptable surface 60, and therefore almost all of the energy can be controlled to be concentrated into a single beam, i.e. a main lobe. The antenna is therefore more efficient. In addition, all the paths between the transceiver 50 and the adaptable surface 60 are contained within the volume of the electromagnetic cavity 80, i.e. inside the wall 20, and the antenna efficiency will be better, thus enhancing the antenna's effectiveness"; Paragraph 0041, "According to a particular embodiment, the housing 90 includes a reflective element 70, capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves into the cavity 80"; Paragraph 0017, "Furthermore, it is possible to control an adaptable surface (called a meta-surface) with conventional electronics (electrical signals) which will "shape" the wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver and transform it into an imaging radar"), wherein said first directional antenna is configured to be connected to the electronic unit via a first waveguide, and wherein the first directional antenna is configured to transmit the electromagnetic wave, transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the first waveguide in a first predetermined direction and/or to propagate the electromagnetic wave received from the first predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the first waveguide (Paragraph 0052, "The transmitter-receiver 50 allows to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave 300 in the thickness of the wall 20, mainly directly towards the adaptable surface 60, by orientation of the transmitter-receiver 50 in the wall 20. This element 50 can be chosen from a list including a monopole, a dipole, a waveguide, a radiating waveguide, and a planar antenna"); and a second directional antenna arranged on a second body part that has a second cavity reflecting the electromagnetic waves wherein a second metasurface is positioned (Figure 4 elements 80a, 80b two chambers of similar construction and function; Paragraph 0033, "According to another embodiment, illustrated in figure 4, the wall 20 has two cavities 80a and 80b: one cavity 80a is dedicated to the transmission of the electromagnetic wave, and another cavity 80b is dedicated to the reception of an electromagnetic wave. To achieve this, the electromagnetic cavity 80 is separated by a reflective wall 85 capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves. Such a reflective wall 85 can for example be overmolded into the wall 20. Each cavity 80a, 80b then includes at least one opening lOOa, lOOb."; Paragraph 0030, "Such a box 90 forms a radar detection system suitable for imaging objects in a space located at the periphery of the vehicle 200. Bodywork part 10 can therefore include several antennas."; Paragraph 0017, "Furthermore, it is possible to control an adaptable surface (called a meta-surface) with conventional electronics (electrical signals) which will "shape" the wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver and transform it into an imaging radar"). Stephan does not specifically disclose wherein said second directional antenna is configured for connection to the electronic unit via a second waveguide and for transmitting the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the second waveguide in a second predetermined direction and/or for propagating the received electromagnetic wave from the second predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the second waveguide. Belot discloses Wherein said second directional antenna is configured for connection to the electronic unit via a second waveguide and for transmitting the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the second waveguide and/or for propagating the received electromagnetic wave from the second predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the second waveguide (Figure 1 elements 103 and T path and R path; Paragraph 0033, " a first dielectric waveguide 107T connects a transmission terminal T of circuit 103 to antenna 105T, and a second dielectric waveguide 107R connects a reception terminal R of circuit 103 to antenna 105R"). Stephan discloses a transceiver with a waveguide, like a radiation waveguide and it discloses two cavities, one for transmitting and one for reception. It does not specify that the second chamber has a second connection. It would be advantageous for the implementation of this invention for the first and second cavity to have a waveguide for the transmitting and receiving of signal. Additionally, it would be advantageous for the transmitting and receiving cavities to have their own waveguide to mitigate interference as the transmit/receive signals travel down the waveguide. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Belot to facilitate implementing a two cavity embodiment of the invention and to mitigate interference from a transmit and receive signal sharing the same waveguide. Izadian discloses A second predetermined direction (Paragraph 0020, “So that for example, four such radars located on four corners of a car would provide a full 360 coverage around the car. For example, a system such as this may aid in autonomous driving of a vehicle”). Stephan discloses a radar but does not specifically disclose that multiple radar can point in multiple directions. It would be advantageous to have the radar pointing in multiple directions to, as Izadian states, Paragraph 0020, “provide a full 360 coverage around the car. For example, a system such as this may aid in autonomous driving of a vehicle.” As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Izadian to add in multiple fields of view to aid in the operation of the ADAS. Regarding claim 2 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1, wherein the first directional antenna is a transmitting antenna and is configured to transmit the electro-magnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the first wave- guide in the first predetermined direction (Paragraph 0001, "motor vehicles, equipped with a directional antenna to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave in a desired direction"; Paragraph 0052, "The transmitter-receiver 50 allows to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave 300 in the thickness of the wall 20, mainly directly towards the adaptable surface 60, by orientation of the transmitter-receiver 50 in the wall 20. This element 50 can be chosen from a list including a monopole, a dipole, a waveguide, a radiating waveguide, and a planar antenna") and the second directional antenna is a receiving antenna and is configured to receive the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the transmitting antenna and reflected by an obstacle and to propagate the received electromagnetic wave to the electronic unit (Figure 4 elements 80a, 80b; Paragraph 0033, "According to another embodiment, illustrated in figure 4, the wall 20 has two cavities 80a and 80b: one cavity 80a is dedicated to the transmission of the electromagnetic wave, and another cavity 80b is dedicated to the reception of an electromagnetic wave. To achieve this, the electromagnetic cavity 80 is separated by a reflective wall 85 capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves. Such a reflective wall 85 can for example be overmolded into the wall 20. Each cavity 80a, 80b then includes at least one opening lOOa, lOOb."; Paragraph 0030, "Such a box 90 forms a radar detection system suitable for imaging objects in a space located at the periphery of the vehicle 200. Bodywork part 10 can therefore include several antennas"). Stephan does not disclose a second waveguide Belot discloses A second waveguide (Figure 1 elements 103 and T path and R path; Paragraph 0033, " a first dielectric waveguide 107T connects a transmission terminal T of circuit 103 to antenna 105T, and a second dielectric waveguide 107R connects a reception terminal R of circuit 103 to antenna 105R"). Stephan discloses a transceiver with a waveguide, like a radiation waveguide and it discloses two cavities, one for transmitting and one for reception. It does not specify that the second chamber has a second connection. It would be advantageous for the implementation of this invention for the first and second cavity to have a waveguide for the transmitting and receiving of signal. Additionally, it would be advantageous for the transmitting and receiving cavities to have their own waveguide to mitigate interference as the transmit/receive signals travel down the waveguide. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Belot to facilitate implementing a two cavity embodiment of the invention and to mitigate interference from a transmit and receive signal sharing the same waveguide. Regarding claim 3 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan further discloses wherein the first directional antenna is configured to be arranged behind a plastic wall of the first body part (Paragraph 0028, "The wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver 50 is almost totally reflected by the adaptable surface 60, and therefore almost all of the energy can be controlled to be concentrated into a single beam, i.e. a main lobe. The antenna is therefore more efficient. In addition, all the paths between the transceiver 50 and the adaptable surface 60 are contained within the volume of the electromagnetic cavity 80, i.e. inside the wall 20, and the antenna efficiency will be better, thus enhancing the antenna's effectiveness"; Paragraph 0020, “a plastic material identical to the plastic material forming the rest of the wall”) and the second directional antenna is configured to be arranged behind a plastic wall of the second body part (Figure 4 elements 80a, 80b; Paragraph 0033, "According to another embodiment, illustrated in figure 4, the wall 20 has two cavities 80a and 80b: one cavity 80a is dedicated to the transmission of the electromagnetic wave, and another cavity 80b is dedicated to the reception of an electromagnetic wave. To achieve this, the electromagnetic cavity 80 is separated by a reflective wall 85 capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves. Such a reflective wall 85 can for example be overmolded into the wall 20. Each cavity 80a, 80b then includes at least one opening lOOa, lOOb."; Paragraph 0030, "Such a box 90 forms a radar detection system suitable for imaging objects in a space located at the periphery of the vehicle 200. Bodywork part 10 can therefore include several antennas" where the second chamber would have an antenna). Regarding claim 4 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 3. Stephan further discloses wherein the first directional antenna and the second directional antenna are configured to be arranged facing a uniform wall of a plastic material (Figure 1 elements 20; Figure 4 elements 80a and 80b; Paragraph 0028, "The wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver 50 is almost totally reflected by the adaptable surface 60, and therefore almost all of the energy can be controlled to be concentrated into a single beam, i.e. a main lobe. The antenna is therefore more efficient. In addition, all the paths between the transceiver 50 and the adaptable surface 60 are contained within the volume of the electromagnetic cavity 80, i.e. inside the wall 20, and the antenna efficiency will be better, thus enhancing the antenna's effectiveness"; Paragraph 0015, “To this end, the invention relates to a body part for a motor vehicle comprising at least one wall made of plastic” where the two chambers are similar in composition and construction). Regarding claim 5 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 3. Stephan further discloses wherein the first directional antenna and the second directional antenna are configured to be placed facing the plastic wall whose radius of curvature is greater than 500 mm (Figure 4 elements 80a and 80b; Paragraph 0028, "The wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver 50 is almost totally reflected by the adaptable surface 60, and therefore almost all of the energy can be controlled to be concentrated into a single beam, i.e. a main lobe. The antenna is therefore more efficient. In addition, all the paths between the transceiver 50 and the adaptable surface 60 are contained within the volume of the electromagnetic cavity 80, i.e. inside the wall 20, and the antenna efficiency will be better, thus enhancing the antenna's effectiveness" where the radius of curvature of a flat wall is infinity). Regarding claim 6 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan further discloses wherein the first body part and the second body part are adjacent body parts (Figure 4 element 80a, 80b). Regarding claim 7 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan does not disclose wherein the first body part is arranged on a first side of the vehicle and the second body part is arranged on a second side of the vehicle opposite to the first side of the vehicle. Izadian discloses Wherein the first body part is arranged on a first side of the vehicle and the second body part is arranged on a second side of the vehicle opposite to the first side of the vehicle (Paragraph 0022, “Paragraph 0022, "the radar units may be mounted in order to have one pointing forward, one pointing backward”). Stephan discloses having a radar device and having two radar devices adjacent to each other but it does not specifically state that it has multiple radar devices pointing in different directions. It would be advantageous to have a radar device pointing not only towards the front but also the back to improve the situational awareness of the ADAS system. By having a radar in the back, it can facilitate avoiding backend collisions or backing up on an object that cannot be seen by the driver. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Izadian to add a radar at the back as well as the front of the car to improve the operation of the ADAS in avoid collisions of differing scenarios. Regarding claim 9 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan further discloses wherein the pre- determined frequency range is greater than 60 GHz (Claim 9, “the transceiver (50) is capable of emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves at various frequencies, in particular 77 GHz”). Regarding claim 10 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan does not disclose wherein the electronic unit is configured to be positioned remotely from the first body part and the second body part. Belot discloses Wherein the electronic unit is configured to be positioned remotely from the first body part and the second body part (Paragraph 0032, "The antennas 105T, 105R may be remote from the central processing unit 101 and from the circuit 103. As an example, antennas 105T and 105R are located at a distance greater than 0.5 meter from the central processing unit and from circuit 103"). Stephan discloses a radar device but does not disclose that the cavity is separated from the electronic unit. The electronic unit being remote would be advantageous for centralizing the control of several antenna in different locations without having to add more hardware than necessary, such as multiple processing units. Additionally, centralized processing of several antennas helps to mitigate timing issues as the central processor can ensure a shared timing reference. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Belot to add in a centralized electronic unit to allow for a central processing of the several antennas to reduce unnecessary hardware and reduce timing issues between several independent units. Regarding claim 11 Stephan discloses An assembly, comprising at least a first body part and a second body part, wherein the assembly further comprises a radar system, wherein the radar system further comprises: an electronic unit configured to transmit and receive an electromagnetic wave in a predetermined frequency range (Figure 4 elements 80a and 80b; Paragraph 0003, "We also know of vehicles equipped with radar-type devices"; Claim 9, “the transceiver (50) is capable of emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves at various frequencies, in particular 77 GHz”); a first directional antenna arranged on a first body part of the motor vehicle (Paragraph 0014, “The invention aims to remedy the aforementioned drawbacks by providing a motor vehicle body part comprising at least one directional antenna, capable of emitting and/or receiving an electromagnetic wave in a given direction from a large area (related to the size of the body part itself)”) and comprising a first reflective cavity reflecting electromagnetic waves wherein a first metasurface is positioned (Figure 2 elements 80, 70, 60; Paragraph 0028, "The wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver 50 is almost totally reflected by the adaptable surface 60, and therefore almost all of the energy can be controlled to be concentrated into a single beam, i.e. a main lobe. The antenna is therefore more efficient. In addition, all the paths between the transceiver 50 and the adaptable surface 60 are contained within the volume of the electromagnetic cavity 80, i.e. inside the wall 20, and the antenna efficiency will be better, thus enhancing the antenna's effectiveness"; Paragraph 0041, "According to a particular embodiment, the housing 90 includes a reflective element 70, capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves into the cavity 80"; Paragraph 0017, "Furthermore, it is possible to control an adaptable surface (called a meta-surface) with conventional electronics (electrical signals) which will "shape" the wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver and transform it into an imaging radar."), wherein said first directional antenna is configured to be connected to the electronic unit via a first waveguide, and wherein the first directional antenna is configured to transmit the electromagnetic wave, transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the first waveguide in a first predetermined direction and/or to propagate the electromagnetic wave received from the first predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the first waveguide (Paragraph 0052, "The transmitter-receiver 50 allows to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave 300 in the thickness of the wall 20, mainly directly towards the adaptable surface 60, by orientation of the transmitter-receiver 50 in the wall 20. This element 50 can be chosen from a list including a monopole, a dipole, a waveguide, a radiating waveguide, and a planar antenna"); and a second directional antenna arranged on a second body part that has a second cavity reflecting the electromagnetic waves wherein a second metasurface is positioned (Figure 4 elements 80a, 80b two chambers of similar construction and function; Paragraph 0033, "According to another embodiment, illustrated in figure 4, the wall 20 has two cavities 80a and 80b: one cavity 80a is dedicated to the transmission of the electromagnetic wave, and another cavity 80b is dedicated to the reception of an electromagnetic wave. To achieve this, the electromagnetic cavity 80 is separated by a reflective wall 85 capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves. Such a reflective wall 85 can for example be overmolded into the wall 20. Each cavity 80a, 80b then includes at least one opening lOOa, lOOb."; Paragraph 0030, "Such a box 90 forms a radar detection system suitable for imaging objects in a space located at the periphery of the vehicle 200. Bodywork part 10 can therefore include several antennas."; Paragraph 0017, "Furthermore, it is possible to control an adaptable surface (called a meta-surface) with conventional electronics (electrical signals) which will "shape" the wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver and transform it into an imaging radar"). Stephan does not specifically disclose wherein said second directional antenna is configured for connection to the electronic unit via a second waveguide and for transmitting the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the second waveguide in a second predetermined direction and/or for propagating the received electromagnetic wave from the second predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the second waveguide. Belot discloses Wherein said second directional antenna is configured for connection to the electronic unit via a second waveguide and for transmitting the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the second waveguide and/or for propagating the received electromagnetic wave from the second predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the second waveguide (Figure 1 elements 103 and T path and R path; Paragraph 0033, " a first dielectric waveguide 107T connects a transmission terminal T of circuit 103 to antenna 105T, and a second dielectric waveguide 107R connects a reception terminal R of circuit 103 to antenna 105R"). Stephan discloses a transceiver with a waveguide, like a radiation waveguide and it discloses two cavities, one for transmitting and one for reception. It does not specify that the second chamber has a second connection. It would be advantageous for the implementation of this invention for the first and second cavity to have a waveguide for the transmitting and receiving of signal. Additionally, it would be advantageous for the transmitting and receiving cavities to have their own waveguide to mitigate interference as the transmit/receive signals travel down the waveguide. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Belot to facilitate implementing a two cavity embodiment of the invention and to mitigate interference from a transmit and receive signal sharing the same waveguide. Izadian discloses A second predetermined direction (Paragraph 0020, “So that for example, four such radars located on four corners of a car would provide a full 360 coverage around the car. For example, a system such as this may aid in autonomous driving of a vehicle”). Stephan discloses a radar but does not specifically disclose that multiple radar can point in multiple directions. It would be advantageous to have the radar pointing in multiple directions to, as Izadian states, Paragraph 0020, “provide a full 360 coverage around the car. For example, a system such as this may aid in autonomous driving of a vehicle.” As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Izadian to add in multiple fields of view to aid in the operation of the ADAS. Regarding claim 12 Stephan discloses A motor vehicle, comprising a first body part, a second body part, and a radar system, wherein the radar system (Figure 4 elements 80a and 80b; Paragraph 0001, "motor vehicles, equipped with a directional antenna to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave in a desired direction"; Paragraph 0003, "We also know of vehicles equipped with radar-type devices") further comprises: an electronic unit configured to transmit and receive an electromagnetic wave in a predetermined frequency range (Claim 9, “the transceiver (50) is capable of emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves at various frequencies, in particular 77 GHz”); a first directional antenna arranged on a first body part of the motor vehicle (Paragraph 0014, “The invention aims to remedy the aforementioned drawbacks by providing a motor vehicle body part comprising at least one directional antenna, capable of emitting and/or receiving an electromagnetic wave in a given direction from a large area (related to the size of the body part itself)”) and comprising a first reflective cavity reflecting electromagnetic waves wherein a first metasurface is positioned (Figure 2 elements 80, 70, 60; Paragraph 0028, "The wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver 50 is almost totally reflected by the adaptable surface 60, and therefore almost all of the energy can be controlled to be concentrated into a single beam, i.e. a main lobe. The antenna is therefore more efficient. In addition, all the paths between the transceiver 50 and the adaptable surface 60 are contained within the volume of the electromagnetic cavity 80, i.e. inside the wall 20, and the antenna efficiency will be better, thus enhancing the antenna's effectiveness"; Paragraph 0041, "According to a particular embodiment, the housing 90 includes a reflective element 70, capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves into the cavity 80"; Paragraph 0017, "Furthermore, it is possible to control an adaptable surface (called a meta-surface) with conventional electronics (electrical signals) which will "shape" the wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver and transform it into an imaging radar."), wherein said first directional antenna is configured to be connected to the electronic unit via a first waveguide, and wherein the first directional antenna is configured to transmit the electromagnetic wave, transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the first waveguide in a first predetermined direction and/or to propagate the electromagnetic wave received from the first predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the first waveguide (Paragraph 0052, "The transmitter-receiver 50 allows to emit and/or receive an electromagnetic wave 300 in the thickness of the wall 20, mainly directly towards the adaptable surface 60, by orientation of the transmitter-receiver 50 in the wall 20. This element 50 can be chosen from a list including a monopole, a dipole, a waveguide, a radiating waveguide, and a planar antenna"); and a second directional antenna arranged on a second body part that has a second cavity reflecting the electromagnetic waves wherein a second metasurface is positioned (Figure 4 elements 80a, 80b two chambers of similar construction and function; Paragraph 0033, "According to another embodiment, illustrated in figure 4, the wall 20 has two cavities 80a and 80b: one cavity 80a is dedicated to the transmission of the electromagnetic wave, and another cavity 80b is dedicated to the reception of an electromagnetic wave. To achieve this, the electromagnetic cavity 80 is separated by a reflective wall 85 capable of reflecting electromagnetic waves. Such a reflective wall 85 can for example be overmolded into the wall 20. Each cavity 80a, 80b then includes at least one opening lOOa, lOOb."; Paragraph 0030, "Such a box 90 forms a radar detection system suitable for imaging objects in a space located at the periphery of the vehicle 200. Bodywork part 10 can therefore include several antennas."; Paragraph 0017, "Furthermore, it is possible to control an adaptable surface (called a meta-surface) with conventional electronics (electrical signals) which will "shape" the wave emitted by the transmitter-receiver and transform it into an imaging radar"). Stephan does not specifically disclose wherein said second directional antenna is configured for connection to the electronic unit via a second waveguide and for transmitting the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the second waveguide in a second predetermined direction and/or for propagating the received electromagnetic wave from the second predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the second waveguide. Belot discloses Wherein said second directional antenna is configured for connection to the electronic unit via a second waveguide and for transmitting the electromagnetic wave transmitted by the electronic unit and propagated via the second waveguide and/or for propagating the received electromagnetic wave from the second predetermined direction to the electronic unit via the second waveguide (Figure 1 elements 103 and T path and R path; Paragraph 0033, " a first dielectric waveguide 107T connects a transmission terminal T of circuit 103 to antenna 105T, and a second dielectric waveguide 107R connects a reception terminal R of circuit 103 to antenna 105R"). Stephan discloses a transceiver with a waveguide, like a radiation waveguide and it discloses two cavities, one for transmitting and one for reception. It does not specify that the second chamber has a second connection. It would be advantageous for the implementation of this invention for the first and second cavity to have a waveguide for the transmitting and receiving of signal. Additionally, it would be advantageous for the transmitting and receiving cavities to have their own waveguide to mitigate interference as the transmit/receive signals travel down the waveguide. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Belot to facilitate implementing a two cavity embodiment of the invention and to mitigate interference from a transmit and receive signal sharing the same waveguide. Izadian discloses A second predetermined direction (Paragraph 0020, “So that for example, four such radars located on four corners of a car would provide a full 360 coverage around the car. For example, a system such as this may aid in autonomous driving of a vehicle”). Stephan discloses a radar but does not specifically disclose that multiple radar can point in multiple directions. It would be advantageous to have the radar pointing in multiple directions to, as Izadian states, Paragraph 0020, “provide a full 360 coverage around the car. For example, a system such as this may aid in autonomous driving of a vehicle.” As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Izadian to add in multiple fields of view to aid in the operation of the ADAS. Regarding claim 13 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan further discloses wherein the predetermined frequency range is between 75 and 80 GHz (Claim 9, “the transceiver (50) is capable of emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves at various frequencies, in particular 77 GHz”). Regarding claim 14 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1. Stephan further discloses wherein the predetermined frequency range is 77 GHz (Claim 9, “the transceiver (50) is capable of emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves at various frequencies, in particular 77 GHz”). Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Stephan (WO 2020043633 A1) in view of Belot (EP 3734749A1) [cited from pdf] in view of Izadian (US 20160047907 A1) further in view of Edward (US 20050253770 A1). Regarding claim 8 the combination of Stephan, Belot, and Izadian discloses The radar system according to claim 1 including a first and second body part. Stephan does not disclose wherein at least one of: the first body part and the second body part is a body part movably mounted on the motor vehicle. Edwards discloses Wherein at least one of: the first body part and the second body part is a body part movably mounted on the motor vehicle (Abstract, "A line-replaceable unit for a phased array antenna including a thermally conductive housing having a front face and an opposed rear face, at least one open-ended waveguide extending through the housing from the front face to the rear face, at least one first radiating element including the waveguide"). Stephan discloses a radar unit and states that it can be placed in various spots, but it does not disclose that the radar is movable. A movable radar unit would be advantageous in that if it is damaged it can be quickly replaced with minimal difficulty, which an also simultaneously reduce the cost of repair/switching a unit out. As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Stephan with Edward to add in a movable radar unit so that they can be easily replaced when damaged and reduce the cost of said replacement. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER D DOZE whose telephone number is (571)272-0392. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:40am - 5:40pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vladimir Magloire can be reached at (571) 270-5144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER DAVON DOZE/Examiner, Art Unit 3648 /VLADIMIR MAGLOIRE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12585007
RECURSIVE DETERMINISTIC MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL IN AUTOMOTIVE RADAR SENSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571907
INVERSE SYNTHETIC APERTURE, MULTIBAND RADAR DETECTION OF HIDDEN OBJECTS WITH SPATIALLY STRUCTURED TRACKING OF OBJECT CARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553990
HYBRID CLUTTER SUPPRESSION USING ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED ANTENNAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12541019
Co-Existence Operations Involving a Radar-Enabled User Equipment and Radio Network Nodes
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12529780
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE RELATIVE PERMITTIVITY OF A MATERIAL USING A GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 22 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month