Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/687,300

LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTIC SOLUTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Priority
Aug 31, 2021 — JP 2021-141173 +1 more
Examiner
RHEE, JANE J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
969 granted / 1127 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1150
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.0%
+39.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1127 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Abe et al. (US20170214091). As to claim 1, Abe et al. discloses lithium ion secondary battery comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode, a separator, and a non-aqueous electrolytic solution comprising an electrolyte salt contained in a non-aqueous solvent (paragraph 0003), the non-aqueous electrolytic solution comprising a pivalate ester (paragraph 0041) in an amount that is 0.1 vol% or greater and less than 5 vol% (paragraph 0042) with respect to the non-aqueous solvent. As to the pivalate ester having from 12 to 13 carbons with a flash point of 90°C or higher and a viscosity of from 2 to 2.3 cp at 25°C, since Abe et al. discloses the same pivalate ester desired by the applicant it is inherent the pivalate ester having from 12 to 13 carbons with a flash point of 90°C or higher and a viscosity of from 2 to 2.3 cp at 25°C. “Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties.” A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658(Fed. Cir. 1990) As to claim 2, Abe et al. discloses wherein the pivalate ester is at least one selected from the group consisting of n-heptyl pivalate, 2-ethylhexyl pivalate, and 2- octyl pivalate (paragraph 0041). As to claim 3, Abe et al. discloses comprising, as the electrolyte salt, from 0.5 to 3 mol/L of LiN(SO2F)2 in the non-aqueous solvent, or from 0.5 to 3 mol/L of LiN(SO2F)2 and LiPF6 in the non-aqueous solvent, wherein LiN(SO2F)2/LiPF6, a weight ratio of the LiN(SO2F)2 to the LiPF6, is from 100/0 to 1/99 (paragraph 0025). As to claim 4, Abe et al. discloses comprising, wherein the non-aqueous solvent comprises ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate, and ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate, a volume ratio of the ethylene carbonate to the propylene carbonate, is from 49/51 to 10/90 (paragraph 0057). As to claim 5, Abe et al. discloses a non-aqueous electrolytic solution comprising an electrolyte salt dissolved in a non- aqueous solvent, the non-aqueous electrolytic solution comprising a pivalate ester in an amount that is 0.1 vol% or greater and less than 5 vol% with respect to the non-aqueous solvent (paragraph 0041-0042). As to the pivalate ester having from 12 to 13 carbons with a flash point of 90°C or higher and a viscosity of from 2 to 2.3 cp at 25°C, since Abe et al. discloses the same pivalate ester desired by the applicant it is inherent that the pivalate ester having from 12 to 13 carbons with a flash point of 90°C or higher and a viscosity of from 2 to 2.3 cp at 25°C. “Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties.” A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658(Fed. Cir. 1990) As to claim 6, Abe et al. discloses comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of (i), (ii) and (iii) below: (i) the pivalate ester is at least one selected from the group consisting of n-heptyl pivalate, 2- ethylhexyl pivalate, and 2-octyl pivalate (paragraph 0041); (ii) the electrolyte salt is LiN(SO2F)2 and LiPF6, the LiN(SO2F)2 and the LiPF6 being dissolved in a total amount of from 0.5 to 3 mol/L in the non-aqueous solvent, and LiN(SO2F)2/LiPF6, a weight ratio of the LiN(SO2F)2 to the LiPF6, is from 100/0 to 1/99 (paragraph 0025); and (iii) the non-aqueous solvent is ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate, a volume ratio of the ethylene carbonate to the propylene carbonate, is from 49/51 to 10/90 (paragraph 0057). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANE J RHEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1499. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (10-6:30). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at 571-270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANE J RHEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665183
ION-CONDUCTIVE SOLID AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665221
ION-CONDUCTIVE SOLID AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658511
ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY, ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY STRUCTURE AND PREPARATION METHOD FOR ALL SOLID SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658542
RIVETING STRUCTURE OF ELECTRODE TERMINAL, AND SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY PACK, AND AUTOMOBILE COMPRISING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651789
Battery Cell and Manufacturing Method Thereof
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+12.4%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1127 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month