Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/687,502

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING A FEMORAL ARRAY CLAMP

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2021 — provisional 63/276,859 +1 more
Examiner
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Smith & Nephew Asia Pacific Pte. Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
949 granted / 1215 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1215 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention II (claims 9-21) in the reply filed on July 31, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-8 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on July 31, 2025. Claim Objections Claim 9 is objected to because of the following informalities: there should be a semicolon after “pin channel” (line 2 on pg. 5). Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: there is both a comma and a semicolon between “throughbore” and “and” (line 6). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 9-17, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chang (US 2014/0257288 A1) in view of Dall et al. (US 2014/0371801 A1). Claim 9. Chang discloses a femoral array clamp, comprising: a housing (housing 400; labeled as housing 240 in Fig. 1); a pin channel (aperture 422, which is mislabeled as 322 in Fig. 4B) extends through the housing and has a pin channel axis (extends into the page in Fig. 4B); a throughbore (bore 406) extends through the housing; a passageway (see Fig. 4B inset) couples the pin channel and the throughbore, and the passageway has a passageway axis (see Fig. 4B inset); a counterbore (bore 432) extends in the housing and has a counterbore axis (see Fig. 4B inset), wherein the counterbore intersects the pin channel (see para. 0055); a fastener (actuation member 600 and wedge member 620) disposed in the counterbore (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 10. Chang discloses: a bone pin (received in pin clamp 500; see bone pin 480 in Fig. 11) disposed in the pin channel, wherein the bone pin defines a bone pin axis (extends into the page in Fig. 4B), the femoral array clamp comprises a relaxed configuration (prior to actuating actuation member 600 such that wedge member 620 acts on pin clamp 500) in which the housing is capable of translating along the bone pin axis (see para. 0055), and the femoral array clamp comprises a locked configuration (after actuating actuation member 600 such that wedge member 620 acts on pin clamp 500, thereby decreasing the diameter of bore 520) in which the fastener engages the bone pin against an array (rod 120) to prevent translation of the housing along the bone pin and prevent movement of the array in the throughbore (see paras. 0055-0056) (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 11. Chang discloses wherein the counterbore axis and the passageway axis are offset from each other where they intersect the pin channel (see Fig. 4B) (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 12. Chang discloses wherein the pin channel axis is perpendicular to the counterbore axis (see Fig. 4B) (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 13. Chang discloses wherein the pin channel axis is perpendicular to the passageway axis (see Fig. 4B) (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 14. Chang discloses wherein the pin channel axis is perpendicular to the counterbore axis (see Fig. 4B) (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 16. Chang discloses wherein the counterbore comprises internal threads (for engagement with threaded portion 604 of actuation member 600; see para. 0052), the fastener is a set screw (actuation member 600 has threaded portion 604) that engages the internal threads, and the counterbore axis is parallel to the passageway axis (see Fig. 4B) (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). Claim 19. Chang discloses system for surgical repair of a femur, the system comprising: a femoral array clamp comprising a housing (housing 400; labeled as housing 240 in Fig. 1); a pin channel (aperture 422, which is mislabeled as 322 in Fig. 4B) extends through the housing and comprises a pin channel axis (extends into the page in Fig. 4B); a throughbore (bore 406) extends through the housing; a passageway (see Fig. 4B inset) extends between the pin channel and the throughbore, and the passageway has a passageway axis (see Fig. 4B inset); a counterbore (bore 432) in the housing with a counterbore axis (see Fig. 4B inset), wherein the counterbore intersects the pin channel (see para. 0055) and the counterbore axis is parallel to the passageway axis (see Fig. 4B); a fastener (actuation member 600 and wedge member 620) disposed in the counterbore; a bone pin (received in pin clamp 500; see bone pin 480 in Fig. 11) configured to be located in the pin channel; and an array (rod 120) is configured to traverse the throughbore (Figs. 1-6; paras. 0038-0058). [AltContent: textbox (Passageway Axis)][AltContent: textbox (Passageway)][AltContent: textbox (Counterbore Axis)] Chang fails to disclose a swage assembly disposed in the throughbore, a portion of the swage assembly protrudes through the passageway into the pin channel (claim 9), wherein in the relaxed configuration, the swage assembly is capable of rotating within the throughbore, wherein in the locked configuration, the fastener engages the bone pin against the swage assembly to prevent rotation of the swage assembly in the throughbore (claim 10), wherein the throughbore comprises an inner surface having a semi-spherical shape (claim 15), wherein the swage assembly comprises a first swage member having a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface, and a second swage member having a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface (claim 17), a swage assembly in the throughbore, wherein a portion of the swage assembly protrudes through the passageway into the pin channel (claim 19), and wherein the swage assembly comprises a first swage member with a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface, and a second swage member with a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface (claim 20). Dall teaches a clamp comprising: a housing (brackets 6 and 8); a pin channel (channel that receives bone screw 2) extending through the housing; a throughbore (bore that receives fixation rod 4) extending through the housing; a ball assembly (ball parts 12 and 14) disposed in the pin channel; and a swage assembly (ball parts 16 and 18) disposed in the throughbore, wherein in a relaxed configuration (prior to actuating locking screw 10), the swage assembly is capable of rotating within the throughbore (see para. 0020), wherein in a locked configuration (after actuating locking screw 10), a fastener (locking screw 10) prevents rotation of the swage assembly in the throughbore (see para. 0020), wherein the throughbore comprises an inner surface having a semi-spherical shape (see para. 0021), and wherein the swage assembly comprises a first swage member (ball part 16) having a semi-spherical outer surface (see para. 0021) and an inner surface, and a second swage member (ball part 18) having a semi-spherical outer surface (see para. 0021) and an inner surface, wherein the use of the ball assembly with a bone pin (bone screw 2) and the swage assembly with an array (fixation rod 4) allows for positioning of the bone pin and array in a desired orientation with respect to each other (see para. 0020), thereby allowing for connection to additional clamps, bone pins, and arrays (see Fig. 3) (Figs. 1-3; paras. 0018-0024). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the clamp of Chang such that it includes a swage assembly disposed in the throughbore (claim 9), wherein in the relaxed configuration, the swage assembly is capable of rotating within the throughbore (claim 10), wherein the throughbore comprises an inner surface having a semi-spherical shape (claim 15), wherein the swage assembly comprises a first swage member having a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface, and a second swage member having a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface (claim 17), a swage assembly in the throughbore (claim 19), and wherein the swage assembly comprises a first swage member with a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface, and a second swage member with a semi-spherical outer surface and an inner surface (claim 20), as suggested by Dall, as the use of a swage assembly with the array in addition to the ball assembly (see pin clamp 500 of Chang) with the bone pin would allow for greater adjustability in the positioning of the bone pin and array with respect to each other, thereby allowing for connection to additional clamps, bone pins, and arrays as needed. In view of such modifications, a portion of the swage assembly would protrude through the passageway into the pin channel (claim 9), in the locked configuration, the fastener would engage the bone pin against the swage assembly to prevent rotation of the swage assembly in the throughbore (claim 10), and a portion of the swage assembly would protrude through the passageway into the pin channel (claim 19). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18 and 21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIANNA N HARVEY whose telephone number is (571)270-3815. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 8:00am-5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert can be reached at (571)272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JULIANNA N HARVEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635998
TISSUE RETRACTOR HAVING OPERATIVE CORRIDOR FORMED BY DILATOR AND BLADES
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636043
JIGS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR CORRECTING JOINT DEFORMITIES
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12611234
Spinal Fixation System
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599411
ROD FOR SPINAL BRACE
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599412
INTRA-OPERATIVE OPTIONS FOR SMART IMPLANTS
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.9%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1215 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month