Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/687,723

HYBRIDIZATION PROBES CONTAINING FLUORINATED CARBON CHAINS AND RELATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Priority
Sep 03, 2021 — provisional 63/240,642 +1 more
Examiner
RILEY, JEZIA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
University of Utah Research Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1089 granted / 1313 resolved
+22.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1332
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1313 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group 1 (claims 1-18, 23 and 24) and species in the reply filed on 07/07/2026 is acknowledged. No prior art was found for the elected species. The examination was extended to species as claimed in claims 7-11. No prior art was found for species claimed in claims 7-11. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 12-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dellinger et al. US 2020/0190129. Dellinger et al. discloses ([0009] and [0019]) an oligonucleotide having a polyfluoronated carbon tag [0009] and [0019], wherein the carbon chain is 1-24 C, and the oligonucleotide is 15-300 nucleotides, wherein the oligo has a linker and alkylene chain (see Figure 7, pages 3, 14, 26, 44-46 and claims). Dellinger et al. discloses wherein the oligonucleotide comprises two fluorinated affinity tags (see page 38 and claims 24, 29 and 34). Dellinger et al. discloses the oligonucleotide can comprise a biotin ([0019], and claim 6). In some embodiments, the orthoester linker reacts with the 5′-hydroxyl of an oligonucleotide, thereby attaching to the 5′-hydroxyl of the oligonucleotide. Thus, in some embodiments, the orthoester linker is attached at the 5′-hydroxyl of the oligonucleotide. In some embodiments, the orthoester linker reacts with the 3′-hydroxyl of an oligonucleotide, thereby attaching to the 3′-hydroxyl of the oligonucleotide. Thus, in some embodiments, the orthoester linker is attached at the 3′-hydroxyl of the oligonucleotide. In some embodiments, the orthoester linker is attached to a hydroxyl group present on a nucleotide base [0141] (this is viewed to be inclusive of claims 3-4 and 12). With regards to claims 14-15, it appears to merely define routine matter for the skilled person working in this field because when an oligonucleotide probe is introduced to a sample, its specific sequence will inherently form stable hydrogen bonds with its complementary target sequence. This specific binding allows the probe to attach to its intended genetic target. Claim(s) 1-4, 12-15, 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Berry et al. US 2010/087634 A1 Berry et al. discloses ([0022]) a polyfluorinated tagged oligonucleotide, and a separation medium, both having a polyfluorinated carbon chain characterized by the formula I-IV ([0026]) having 1-4 carbons, and (Fig. 10) 10-100 nucleotides, wherein the fluorous tagged oligonucleotide may have a linker (example 2 compound 14 and claims). Berry et al. teaches that the tagged oligonucleotide can comprise a fluorescent , a quencher or a biotin [0026]; [0061]-[0064]. Berry et al. teaches examples of such permanently fluorous-tagged oligonucleotide reagents that could be installed internally or at the 5'- or 3'-termini are shown to include quenchers of fluorescence such as dabcyl. The incorporation of such quenchers of fluorescence into an oligonucleotide is important in the conventional generation of fluorescent hybridization probes such as molecular beacons, and the installation of a fluorous-tagged variant of such probes would facilitate the purification thereof [0136]-[0138]. Berry et al. discloses in [0162]-[0167] and Fig. 9, the use thereof in a method for enriching target nucleic acids in a mixture of a population of nucleic acids. Berry et al. further discloses ([0012]-[0017]) a method for the purification of oligonucleotides synthesized from one or more such reagents which takes advantage of the heightened affinity between the at least one fluorous group and the separation media. With regards to claims 14-15, it appears to merely define routine matter for the skilled person working in this field since when an oligonucleotide probe is introduced to a sample, its specific sequence will inherently form stable hydrogen bonds with its complementary target sequence. This specific binding allows the probe to attach to its intended genetic target. Claims 7-11, 16-18 and 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEZIA RILEY whose telephone number is (571)272-0786. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Benzion can be reached at 571-272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEZIA RILEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681 23 July 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703881
METHOD FOR LABELING NUCLEIC ACID
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698523
ENHANCEMENT OF NUCLEIC ACID POLYMERIZATION BY AROMATIC COMPOUNDS
4y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697596
COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING ENCAPSULATED LYOPHILISED MICROSPHERES
4y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12680132
NUCLEOTIDE CLEAVABLE LINKERS WITH RIGID SPACERS AND USES THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680127
METHOD FOR POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1313 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month