Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/687,953

SWITCHING PROCESS WITH SUSPENSION INTERVAL FOLLOWING A HANDOVER PROCEDURE PERFORMED BY A UE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Examiner
MADDOX, MICHAEL WAYNE
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
100%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 100% — above average
100%
Career Allow Rate
21 granted / 21 resolved
+42.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
44
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 21 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-5, 9-10, and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Da Silva et al. (US 2024/0107409 A1)(hereinafter “Da Silva”). Regarding claim 1, Da Silva discloses a user equipment (UE) (Fig. 16, [¶0288]: UE 200), comprising: one or more non-transitory computer-readable media having computer- executable instructions embodied thereon (Fig. 16, [¶0288]: storage medium 221); and at least one processor coupled to the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media and configured to execute the computer-executable instructions (Fig. 16, [¶0289]: processing circuitry 201 may be configured to process computer instructions and data.) to: while maintaining a first Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection with a first base station (BS) of a first network (Figs. 7-8, [¶0076]: the UE is in CONNECTED mode with a first PLMN (PLMN-A) and is connected to a first cell associated to a first gNodeB (source gNodeB (PLMN-A) and in IDLE/INACTIVE mode in a second PLMN (PLMN-B) associated with a gNodeB (PLMN-B).), receive transmissions from a BS of a second network during at least one time period specified in a switch gap configuration ([¶0011]: while in RRC_IDLE, the UE monitors paging channels transmitted by the gNodeB (PLMN-B) of the second PLMN (PLMN-B) during paging occasions. [¶0078]: the UE monitors the second PLMN based using UE gaps according to a gap configuration (“a switch gap configuration”) to allow the UE to perform idle/ or inactive procedures in the second PLMN); receive an RRC reconfiguration message from the first BS of the first network, the RRC reconfiguration message comprising a first command and a second command, the first command instructing the UE to begin a handover procedure from the first BS of the first network to a second BS of the first network (Fig. 7, [0076]: the method further comprises the UE receiving a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with sync) from the source gNodeB (PLMN-A).), and the second command controlling usage of the switch gap configuration by the UE following completion of the handover procedure (Fig. 7, [0076]: including a gap configuration (e.g., a measurement gap configuration within measConfig of IE MeasConfigNR where gap configuration is based on the first indication the target gNodeB has received), providing the UE gaps for the UE to perform idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN.); initiate execution of the handover procedure according to the first command (Fig. 7, [¶0076]: the method further comprises performing a handover to the target cell of the target gNodeB (Second gNodeB), i.e., performing random access and transmitting an RRC Reconfiguration Complete.); and when the second command suspends continued usage of the switch gap configuration during a time interval following the completion of the handover procedure, suspend reception of transmissions from the BS of the second network during the time interval (Fig. 8, [¶0078]: after completion of the handover procedure, the UE performs idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN based on the UE gaps provided in the gap configuration. Accordingly, usage of the gap configuration is suspended during a time interval following the completion of the handover procedure.). Regarding claim 3, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Da Silva also discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to: after suspending the reception of transmissions from the BS of the second network during the time interval, resume the reception of transmissions from the BS of the second network after an expiration of the time interval (Fig. 8, [¶0078]: after completion of the handover procedure, the UE performs idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN based on the UE gaps provided in the gap configuration. Accordingly, usage of the gap configuration is suspended during a time interval following the completion of the handover procedure. Fig. 8, [0078]: subsequently, the UE resumes monitoring the second PLMN according to the gap configuration provided in the handover command.). Regarding claim 4, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Da Silva also discloses wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to: where the second command disables suspension of continued usage of the switch gap configuration, continue to receive transmissions from the BS of the second network following the completion of the handover procedure (Fig. 8, [¶0078]: after completion of the handover procedure, the UE performs idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN based on the UE gaps provided in the gap configuration. Accordingly, usage of the gap configuration is suspended during a time interval following the completion of the handover procedure. Fig. 8, [0078]: subsequently, the UE resumes monitoring the second PLMN according to the gap configuration provided in the handover command.). Regarding claim 5, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Da Silva also discloses wherein the RRC reconfiguration message comprises an RRCReconfiguration message (Fig. 7, [0076]: the method further comprises the UE receiving a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with sync) from the source gNodeB (PLMN-A).). Regarding claim 9, Da Silva discloses: a base station (BS) of a first network (Fig. 8: source eNodeB (PLMN-A), the BS comprising: one or more non-transitory computer-readable media having computer- executable instructions embodied thereon (Fig. 15, [¶0247]: device readable medium 180); and at least one processor coupled to the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media and configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to (Fig. 15, [¶0247]: processing circuitry 170): maintain a first Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection with a user equipment (UE) while facilitating gaps in communication with the UE according to a switch gap configuration (Figs. 7-8, [¶0076]: the UE is in CONNECTED mode with a first PLMN (PLMN-A) and is connected to a first cell associated to a first gNodeB (source gNodeB (PLMN-A) and in IDLE/INACTIVE mode in a second PLMN (PLMN-B) associated with a gNodeB (PLMN-B). ([¶0011]: while in RRC_IDLE, the UE monitors paging channels transmitted by the gNodeB (PLMN-B) of the second PLMN (PLMN-B) during paging occasions. [¶0078]: the UE monitors the second PLMN based using UE gaps according to a gap configuration (“a switch gap configuration”) to allow the UE to perform idle/ or inactive procedures in the second PLMN)); and transmit, to the UE, an RRC reconfiguration message comprising a first command and a second command, the first command instructing the UE to begin a handover procedure from the BS of the first network to another BS of the first network (Fig. 7, [0076]: the method further comprises the UE receiving a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with sync) from the source gNodeB (PLMN-A).), and the second command controlling usage of the switch gap configuration by the UE following completion of the handover procedure (Fig. 7, [0076]: including a gap configuration (e.g., a measurement gap configuration within measConfig of IE MeasConfigNR where gap configuration is based on the first indication the target gNodeB has received), providing the UE gaps for the UE to perform idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN.). Regarding claim 10, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 9 as outlined above. Da Silva also discloses the at least one processor further configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to: transmit, to the other BS of the first network, a handover request message comprising the switch gap configuration ([¶0078]: the method further comprises determining to perform a handover to a second cell associated to a second gNodeB and transmitting to the second gNodeB a message (e.g., Handover Request message) including information associated to UE's required gaps for performing idle/inactive procedures in the second PLMN, e.g., at least the same indication received by the first gNodeB and/or updated versions of the information based on target cell timing properties (system frame number, synchronization, etc.) or another indication based on the occurrence of at least one idle event in the second PLMN.); and receive, from the other BS in response to the handover request message, a handover request acknowledgment message comprising the first command and the second command ([¶0078]: the method further comprises receiving from the second gNodeB a message acknowledging the handover (e.g., Handover Request Acknowledgement message) that includes an RRCReconfiguration generated by the target that includes a measurement gap configuration. The method further comprises transmitting to the UE a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with synchronization) including a gap configuration (e.g., a measurement gap configuration within measConfig of IE MeasConfigNR where gap configuration is based on the indication the target gNodeB has received) providing the UE gaps for the UE to perform idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN.). Regarding claim 12, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 10 as outlined above. Da Silva further discloses wherein the handover request acknowledgment message comprises an RRCReconfiguration message comprising the first command and the second command ([¶0078]: the method further comprises receiving from the second gNodeB a message acknowledging the handover (e.g., Handover Request Acknowledgement message) that includes an RRCReconfiguration generated by the target that includes a measurement gap configuration. The method further comprises transmitting to the UE a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with synchronization) including a gap configuration (e.g., a measurement gap configuration within measConfig of IE MeasConfigNR where gap configuration is based on the indication the target gNodeB has received) providing the UE gaps for the UE to perform idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN. [¶0226] the method further comprises receiving from the second gNodeB a message acknowledging the handover (e.g. Handover Request Acknowledgement message). The message includes an RRCReconfiguration generated by the target that includes a measurement gap configuration.). Regarding claim 13, Da Silva discloses: a base station (BS) of a first network (Fig. 8: source eNodeB (PLMN-A), the BS comprising: one or more non-transitory computer-readable media having computer- executable instructions embodied thereon (Fig. 15, [¶0247]: processing circuitry 170); and at least one processor coupled to the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media and configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to (Fig. 15, [¶0247]: processing circuitry 170): receive, from another BS of the first network, a handover request message for a user equipment (UE), the handover request message comprising a switch gap configuration that specifies at least one time period during which the UE receives transmissions from a BS of a second network ([¶0078]: the method further comprises determining to perform a handover to a second cell associated to a second gNodeB and transmitting to the second gNodeB a message (e.g., Handover Request message) including information associated to UE's required gaps for performing idle/inactive procedures in the second PLMN, e.g., at least the same indication received by the first gNodeB and/or updated versions of the information based on target cell timing properties (system frame number, synchronization, etc.) or another indication based on the occurrence of at least one idle event in the second PLMN.); generate an RRC reconfiguration message comprising a first command and a second command, the first command instructing the UE to begin a handover procedure from the other BS of the first network to the BS of the first network (Fig. 7, [0076]: the method further comprises the UE receiving a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with sync) from the source gNodeB (PLMN-A).), and the second command controlling usage of the switch gap configuration by the UE following completion of the handover procedure (Fig. 7, [0076]: including a gap configuration (e.g., a measurement gap configuration within measConfig of IE MeasConfigNR where gap configuration is based on the first indication the target gNodeB has received), providing the UE gaps for the UE to perform idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN.); and transmit, to the other BS, a handover request acknowledgment message comprising the RRC reconfiguration message ([¶0078]: the method further comprises receiving from the second gNodeB a message acknowledging the handover (e.g., Handover Request Acknowledgement message) that includes an RRCReconfiguration generated by the target that includes a measurement gap configuration. The method further comprises transmitting to the UE a handover command (e.g., RRC Reconfiguration including a reconfiguration with synchronization) including a gap configuration (e.g., a measurement gap configuration within measConfig of IE MeasConfigNR where gap configuration is based on the indication the target gNodeB has received) providing the UE gaps for the UE to perform idle and/or inactive procedures in the second PLMN.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Da Silva in view of Velev et al. (US 2024/0196468 A1)(hereinafter “Velev”). Regarding claim 2, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Da Silva does not disclose wherein the second command comprises an indication of the time interval. However, Velev discloses wherein the second command comprises an indication of the time interval ([¶0235]: in certain embodiments, the processor further determines a service gap time based on the away time, where the RRC reconfiguration information indicates the service gap time (e.g., using parameter ServiceGapTime). In certain embodiments, the processor initiates a timer in response to sending the RRC reconfiguration information, said timer have a value based on the determined service gap time. [¶0091]: during the service gap time the UE does not expect to receive DL data or paging, so that the UE may use the radio transmitter to perform radio procedures (e.g., radio measurements or transmissions) in a different cell or network.). Accordingly, Velev discloses including an indication of a time interval for suspending reception or transmission from a base station within an RRC reconfiguration message. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RRCReconfiguration message, as taught by Da Silva, to include an indication of a time interval for suspending reception or transmission from a base station within an RRC reconfiguration message, as taught by Velev. Doing so allows for the UE to use the radio transmitter to perform radio procedures (e.g., radio measurements or transmissions) in a different network or cell. (See Velev [¶0091]). Regarding claim 6, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 5 as outlined above. Da Silva does not disclose wherein the second command comprises a switch- SuspendIntervalValue command comprising a timer value associated with the time interval. However, Velev discloses wherein the second command comprises a switchSuspendIntervalValue command comprising a timer value associated with the time interval ([¶0235]: in certain embodiments, the processor further determines a service gap time based on the away time, where the RRC reconfiguration information indicates the service gap time (e.g., using parameter ServiceGapTime). In certain embodiments, the processor initiates a timer in response to sending the RRC reconfiguration information, said timer have a value based on the determined service gap time. [¶0091]: during the service gap time the UE does not expect to receive DL data or paging, so that the UE may use the radio transmitter to perform radio procedures (e.g., radio measurements or transmissions) in a different cell or network.). Examiner submits that the ServiceGapTime parameter of Velev is equivalent to the switchSuspendIntervalValue of claim 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RRCReconfiguration message, as taught by Da Silva, to include a timer value associated with a time interval for suspending reception or transmission from a base station within an RRC reconfiguration message, as taught by Velev. Doing so allows for the UE to use the radio transmitter to perform radio procedures (e.g., radio measurements or transmissions) in a different network or cell. (See Velev [¶0091]). Regarding claim 7, Da Silva in view of Velev discloses all features of claim 6 as outlined above. Da Silva also discloses wherein the RRCReconfiguration message comprises an OtherConfig information element (IE) ([¶0180]- [¶0181]: the IE OtherConfig contains configuration related to miscellaneous other configurations.). Da Silva fails to disclose that the OtherConfig information element (IE) comprises the switchSuspendIntervalValue command. However, Velev discloses the RRCReconfiguration message comprising the switchSuspendIntervalValue command (([¶0235]: in certain embodiments, the processor further determines a service gap time based on the away time, where the RRC reconfiguration information indicates the service gap time (e.g., using parameter ServiceGapTime). In certain embodiments, the processor initiates a timer in response to sending the RRC reconfiguration information, said timer have a value based on the determined service gap time. [¶0091]: during the service gap time the UE does not expect to receive DL data or paging, so that the UE may use the radio transmitter to perform radio procedures (e.g., radio measurements or transmissions) in a different cell or network.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the OtherConfig IE within the RRCReconfiguration message, as taught by Da Silva, to include a timer value associated with a time interval for suspending reception or transmission from a base station within an switchSuspendIntervalValue command of an RRC reconfiguration message, as taught by Velev. Doing so allows for the UE to use the radio transmitter to perform radio procedures (e.g., radio measurements or transmissions) in a different network or cell. (See Velev [¶0091]). Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Da Silva in view of Lee et al. (US 2023/0048297 A1)(hereinafter “Lee”). Regarding claim 8, Da Silva discloses all features of claim 1 as outlined above. Da Silva does not disclose receiving an RRCReconfiguration message comprising a switchGapConfig IE comprising the switch gap configuration. However, Lee discloses receiving an RRCReconfiguration message comprising a switchGapConfig IE comprising the switch gap configuration ([¶0061]: the UE may receive a switching gap configuration through dedicated signaling (e.g., including an RRC reconfiguration (RRCReconfiguration) message, an RRC resume (RRCResume) message, an RRC release (RRCRelease) message (with or without a suspend configuration), and/or a new RRC message) while attaching/connecting to a network. The switching gap configuration may include an Information Element (IE) denoted as MeasGapConfig (e.g., as provided in 3GPP Technical Specification (TS) 38.331 v16.5.0) to determine the switching gap configuration, control the setup/release of measurement gaps, and/or other switching gap related information (e.g., including initial status of the associated switching gap, and/or type of the associated switching gap). In some implementations, the switching gap may be determined by a new switching gap IE (e.g., denoted as MUSIMGapConfig) to specify the switching gap configuration, control setup/release of measurement gaps, and/or other switching-gap-related information (e.g., including initial status of the associated switching gap, type of the associated switching gap, and/or priority) for specific/dedicated multi-USIM use. In some implementations, a UE may receive a switching gap configuration from system information (e.g., via System Information Block 1 (SIB1) and/or other SI).). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the RRCReconfiguration message, as taught by Da Silva, to include the switching gap configuration Information Element (IE) comprising the switch gap information, as taught by Lee. Doing so allows for transmitting the switch gap configuration using signaling that is compliant with existing communication standards (i.e., the 3GPP Technical Specification)(See Lee [¶0061]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11 and 14-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Bae et al. (US 2024/0260121 A1) – Apparatus and Method For Supporting Network Switching Of User Equipment In Wireless Communication System. Shrivastava et al. (US 2024/0196195 A1) – Method and Apparatus For Managing Link For A MUSIM UE In A Wireless Communication System. Shrivastava et al. (US 2023/0396984 A1) – GAP Configuration For UE Comprising A Plurality Of SIMS In Wireless Network. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL W MADDOX whose telephone number is (571)272-5834. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7:30am-5:00pm, 1st F 7:30am-4:00pm, 2nd F off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad M Nawaz can be reached at 571-272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL WAYNE MADDOX/Examiner, Art Unit 2463 /CHI TANG P CHENG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592747
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING INFORMATION CHARACTERIZING SPATIAL SEPARATION BETWEEN RADIO CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12568483
METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR ANALYZING AND/OR VISUALIZING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BY A USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563463
EVENT-BASED LAYER 1 MEASUREMENT REPORTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563642
BASE STATION MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12543205
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION METHOD PERFORMING RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROCESSING IN CONSIDERATION OF HIGH SPEED, LARGE CAPACITY, HIGH RELIABILITY, OR LOW LATENCY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
100%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 21 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month