Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/688,012

AXIAL FLUX MACHINE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Priority
Sep 06, 2021 — DE 10 2021 122 967.7 +1 more
Examiner
SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
42 granted / 60 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+40.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
84
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 60 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to the Applicant's communication filed May 21, 2026. In view of this communication and the amendment concurrently filed: claims 1-16 were previously pending; no claims were cancelled and no claims were added by amendment; and thus, claims 1-16 are now pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed May 21, 2026 have been fully considered. The Applicant's first point (page 7 of Remarks) amends claims 4 and 12 to overcome the 112(b) rejections. The Examiner agrees with the Applicant’s amendment, thus the 112(b) rejections are now moot and removed. The Applicant's second point (page 7-8 of Remarks) amends claim 1 to include limitations not priorly examined. The limitations introduce new structure that is not taught by the previously presented rejection, thus the amendment necessitates a new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-10 and 12-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BOEKER (WO 2016005082 A1) in view of VELLY (US 20220052571 A1). Regarding claim 1, BOEKER teaches: An axial flux machine(Fig 5; 1)[0035], comprising: a rotor(Fig 5; 4) rotatably mounted relative to a stator(Fig 5; 3), wherein the stator (Fig 5; 3)has at least one first disc-shaped stator body (Fig 5; 31)[0037] and the rotor (Fig 5; 4)as well as the first stator body (Fig 5; 31) are arranged such that a first magnetically effective gap (Fig 5; 7) through which a cooling fluid can flow is formed axially between the first stator body (Fig 5; 31)and the rotor(Fig 5; 4) [0034], wherein the axial flux machine (Fig 5; 1) has at least one first cooling circuit(arrows in Fig 5 denote air circuits, the examiner will reference cooling circuits as C1 and C2 respectfully), in which the cooling fluid(air [abstract]), during operation of the axial flux machine(Fig 5; 1), enters the first gap (Fig 5; 7) at a radially inner periphery(Fig 5; 9), flows through the first gap (Fig 5; 7)outwardly in a radial direction, and exits the first gap(Fig 5; 7) at a radially outer periphery(Fig 5; 8) (indicated by the arrow in Fig 5)[0019], wherein at least one first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1) through which the cooling fluid can flow is arranged at the outer periphery (Fig 5; 8)of the first gap(Fig 5; 7) and guides the cooling fluid back to the radially inner periphery (Fig 5; 9)of the first gap(Fig 5; 7)[0048]. PNG media_image1.png 664 797 media_image1.png Greyscale BOEKER does not teach: further comprises a flow-control valve or switching element(Fig 3; 43/44) in fluid communication with the at least one first cooling circuit(Fig 2; 14) and configured to remain closed below, and to open automatically above, at least one of a predetermined rotor speed, pressure differential or centrifugal force so that circulation of cooling fluid through the at least one first cooling circuit is enabled. VELLY teaches: further comprises a flow-control valve or switching element(Fig 3; 43/44) in fluid communication with the at least one first cooling circuit(Fig 2; 14) and configured to remain closed below, and to open automatically above, at least one of a predetermined rotor speed, pressure differential or centrifugal force so that circulation of cooling fluid through the at least one first cooling circuit is enabled (the valves are set to be at predetermined regulation means based on the calibrated pressure[0078-0080]). PNG media_image2.png 344 487 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 503 781 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify BOEKER by using the valves taught by VELLY, in order to make it possible to balance the flow rates injected by the circuit [0081 VELLY]; thus balancing the means of cooling and improving efficiency. Additionally, the combination BOEKER/VELLY discloses the claimed invention except for the automation of opening and closing the control valve. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to automate the opening and closing of the valve, since it has been held that broadly providing a mechanical or automatic means to replace manual activity which has accomplished the same result involves only routine skill in the art. In re Venner, 120 USPQ 192. Regarding claim 2, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 1: wherein the rotor (Fig 5; 4)has a rotor shaft (Fig 5; 5) with at least one first disc-shaped rotor body (Fig 5; 4)[0036] arranged on the rotor shaft (Fig 5; 5)in a non-rotatable manner[0042]. Regarding claim 3, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 2: wherein the stator comprises at least one second disc-shaped stator body(Fig 5; 31)(two units [0036]), which is arranged coaxially to the first stator body (Fig 5; 31)and to the rotor shaft (Fig 5; 5)with axial interposition of one of the rotor bodies(Fig 5; 4) spaced apart from the first stator body(Fig 5; 31). Regarding claim 4, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 3: wherein the axial flux machine (Fig 5; 1) has at least one second cooling circuit(Fig 5; C2), in which the cooling fluid, during operation of the axial flux machine(Fig 5; 1), enters a second gap (Fig 5; 7)at a radially inner periphery (Fig 5; 9) between a stator body (Fig 5; 31)and the rotor (Fig 5; 4) or a second gap (Fig 5; 7)between the motor housing (Fig 5; 13)and the rotor(Fig 5; 14), flows through the second gap (Fig 5; 7)outwardly in a radial direction, and exits the second gap (Fig 5; 7) at a radially outer periphery(Fig 5; 8) (indicated by the arrow in Fig 5)[0019], wherein at least one of the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)or at least one second cooling channel(Fig 5; C2) through which the cooling fluid can flow is arranged at the outer periphery (Fig 5; 9) of the second gap (Fig 5; 7) and guides the cooling fluid back to the radially inner periphery (Fig 5; 8)of the second gap(Fig 5; 7)[0048]. Regarding claim 5, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 4: wherein at least one of the first stator body (Fig 5; 31) or the second stator body (Fig 5; 31)is accommodated in a stator carrier(Fig 5; 2)[0036]. Regarding claim 6, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 5: wherein the stator (Fig 5; 3) is surrounded by the motor housing (Fig 5; 13) at least in sections, wherein at least one of: the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)or the at least one second cooling (Fig 5; C2)channel is formed at least in sections between the motor housing (Fig 5; 13)and the stator(Fig 5; 3)(space 10 in Fig 5); or the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)or the second cooling channel (Fig 5; C2)is formed at least in sections in the motor housing(Fig 5; 13)(space 25 in Fig 7); or the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)or the second cooling channel (Fig 5; C2)is formed at least in sections in or on one of the stator bodies or the stator carrier(space 10 in Fig 4). Regarding claim 7, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 6: wherein at least one of the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)or the second cooling channel (Fig 5; C2)has, in a region of the outer periphery (Fig 5; 8) of one of the gaps(Fig 5; 7), a first cooling channel section (Fig 5; 14)open in the radial direction towards the gap(Fig 5; 7)[0048]. Regarding claim 8, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 7: wherein the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)section has, at least in sections, a channel section associated with the first gap and a channel section associated with the second gap(each gap 7 corresponds to each channel section 10). Regarding claim 9, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 8: wherein at least one of the first cooling channel (Fig 5; C1)and/or the second cooling channel (Fig 5; C2) has a second cooling channel section extending in the axial direction(Fig 5; 12), which connects the first cooling channel section(Fig 5; 14) to a third cooling channel section extending in the radial direction(Fig 5; 12)(cooling channel 12 has two parts a radial and axial portion). Regarding claim 10, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 9: wherein the rotor shaft (Fig 5; 5)of the rotor (Fig 5; 4) has at least one fourth cooling channel section (Fig 5; 15)extending in the axial direction, which connects the radially inner periphery (Fig 5; 9)of one of the gaps (Fig 5; 7)to the third cooling channel section(Fig 5; 12). Regarding claim 12, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 4. BOEKER does not teach: wherein the flow-control valve or switching element is arranged in the first cooling channel and/or the second cooling channel. VELLY teaches: wherein the flow-control valve or switching element (Fig 3; 43/44) is arranged in the first cooling channel and/or the second cooling channel(Fig 3; 33/34). Regarding claim 13, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 12: wherein the control of the flow rate of cooling fluid is implemented in a temperature- dependent manner(the rotor acts as a compressor, which is a pressure dependent manner; thus by innate property a temperature dependent manner for a closed system[0019]). Regarding claim 14, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 13: wherein the control of the flow rate of cooling fluid is designed such that a circulation of cooling fluid through one of the first or second cooling channels(Fig 5; C1/C2) is enabled in a field weakening region(the field weakening region occurs in the gap 7, and causes a media build up in the outer periphery[0019]) of the axial flux machine, while a circulation of cooling fluid through one of the first or second cooling channels (Fig 5; 10)outside of the field weakening region (Fig 5; 7)of the axial flux machine is at least reduced. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BOEKER (WO 2016005082 A1), in view of VELLY (US 20220052571 A1), in further view of CUI (CN 205319816 U). Regarding claim 11, BOEKER in view of VELLY, teaches the axial flux machine according to claim 10. Combination BOEKER/VELLY does not teach: wherein the rotor shaft has a fifth cooling channel section extending in the axial direction through the rotor shaft, which connects the gaps to one another in a communicating manner. CUI teaches: wherein the rotor shaft (Fig 1; 1) has a fifth cooling channel section (Fig 1; 7) extending in the axial direction through the rotor shaft(Fig 1; 1), which connects the gaps to one another in a communicating manner[pg 2; 19-26]. PNG media_image4.png 390 717 media_image4.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the rotary shaft disclosed in BOEKER by the fifth cooling channel section taught by CUI in order to increase the cooling capacity of the stator disc [pg 1; 24-28 CUI]. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS L SETZER whose telephone number is (571)272-3021. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.L.S./Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 21, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706514
Electromagnetic Actuator
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700764
MOTOR ROTOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695337
SYNCHRONOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINE, AND ASSOCIATED PROPULSION ORIENTED DRIVE DEVICE, BOAT, AND METHOD FOR COOLING SUCH A MACHINE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695364
SLIP RING DEVICE FOR MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683467
MOTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.0%)
2y 7m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 60 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month