Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/688,137

METHOD FOR OPERATING A FLAP ASSEMBLY OF A MOTOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Examiner
CHEN, SHELLEY
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Brose Fahrzeugteile SE & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Bamberg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
349 granted / 528 resolved
+14.1% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
551
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 2. Claims 1-19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawai (WIPO Patent Application Publication # WO 2018/109925) in view of Kemper et al. (German Patent Application Publication # DE 10 2019 211 776) Regarding claims 1 and 11, Kiwai discloses a method for operating a door arrangement of a motor vehicle with a door which can be adjusted via a door kinematic system, the door arrangement comprising a control arrangement (110) for actuating a drive arrangement (109) with at least one electric drive and a sensor arrangement (111, 205) for detecting operator actions, a plurality of predefined operating actions being provided to trigger an actuating function of the door arrangement (P52, 23, 26, etc), the occurrence of at least one of the predefined operator actions being monitored by means of the control arrangement on the basis of the detection via the sensor arrangement, and the drive arrangement being actuated, in a manner which is dependent on the occurrence, to provide the actuating function of the door arrangement (P23, 26, etc) by motor (P23, 26, etc: implicit), the output of an operator information item which contains an indication to the operator of at least one of the predefined operator actions being carried out being caused by the control arrangement (P25-26, etc), wherein the predefined operator actions are assigned respective boundary conditions to be met, wherein at least one of the predefined operator actions is selected as recommended operator action by means of the control arrangement based on the assignment and the given boundary conditions, and wherein the indication of the operator information item is directed at the at least one recommended operator action being carried out (P77-78, etc). Kiwai does not explicitly disclose that the actuating function of the door arrangement is by motor. In the same field of endeavor, Kemper discloses that the actuating function of the door arrangement is by motor (P2-3, etc). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kiwai to use a motor, as taught by Kemper, in order to mechanically actuate the door, with predictable results. Regarding claim 2, Kiwai further discloses that at least one operator gesture, a contact of a component of the door arrangement by the operator, the actuation of an actuating element of the door arrangement, a manual door movement Regarding claim 3, Kiwai further discloses that the change in a locked state of a motor vehicle loc Regarding claim 4, Kiwai further discloses that the boundary conditions relate to the vehicle situation of the motor vehicle Regarding claim 5, Kiwai further discloses that the boundary conditions relate to the surroundings situation of the motor vehicle (P84, etc). Regarding claim 6, Kiwai further discloses that the output of the operator information item on a visual display apparatuscontrol arrangement Regarding claim 7, Kiwai further discloses that the visual display apparatus comprises at least a first display field for identifying an execution area of an operator gesture and at least a second display field for identifying an actuating area for the operator (P25-26, 78, 85, 108, etc) Regarding claim 8, Kiwai further discloses that an operator default, in which at least one of the predefined operator actions is stored as preferred operator action, is provided for the predefined operator actions, and wherein, if the preferred operator action is categorized as one of the recommended operator actions, the operator information item contains an indication to carry out the preferred operator action (P84, etc). Regarding claim 9, Kiwai further discloses that the operator default is determined by an operator input, in a manner which is dependent on an operator authorization which is assigned to the operator and/or which is dependent on the position of the door on the motor vehicle (P84, etc). Regarding claim 10, Kiwai further discloses that the operator default contains, furthermore, an output default for outputting the operator information item (P84, etc) Regarding claim 12, Kiwai further discloses a motor vehicle configured to carry out a method as claimed in claim 1 (abstract, etc). Regarding claim 13, Kiwai further discloses that the motorized adjustment of the door comprises motorized raising, motorized opening or motorized closing of the door (Kemper P2-3, etc). Regarding claim 14, Kiwai further discloses that the vehicle situation comprises the presence of a crash state, the charging state of an energy store of the motor vehicle, an inclination of the motor vehicle or the state of components of the door arrangement (P77-78, etc). Regarding claim 15, Kiwai further discloses that the surroundings situation of the motor vehicle comprise the space which is available in the region of the door arrangement and/or the presence of obstacles in the region of the door arrangement, (P84, etc) Regarding claim 16, Kiwai further discloses that the surroundings situation is detected at least partially by the sensor arrangement (P84, etc). Regarding claim 17, Kiwai further discloses that the visual display apparatus is arranged on an actuating element (P25-26, 78, 85, 108, etc). Regarding claim 18, Kiwai further discloses that a combined actuation of the first display field and the second display field is used to identify a contact area for the operator (P25-26, 78, 85, 108, etc). Regarding claim 19, Kiwai further discloses that the output default relates to a light sequence and/or color to be output for the visual display apparatus (P25-26, 78, 85, 108, etc: color implicit from display, even if it is a single color). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHELLEY CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1330. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays through Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erin Bishop can be reached at (571) 270-3713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Shelley Chen/ Patent Examiner Art Unit 3665 December 27, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12576862
SYSTEM FOR DETECTING A FAULTY ECU ON A VEHICLE NETWORK AND A METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568872
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EQUIPMENT CONTROL USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL-BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570274
INFRASTRUCTURE-BASED COLLABORATIVE AUTOMATED PARKING AND LOCATION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570272
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AT LEAST ONE DEVICE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE, AND ASSOCIATED MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12557722
Agricultural Lane Following
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+21.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month