Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 28, 2026
Application No. 18/688,188

QOE CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS DURING RRC RESUMING PROCESS

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2021 — CN 202111151906.X +1 more
Examiner
KELLER, MICHAEL A
Art Unit
2446
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
596 granted / 691 resolved
+28.3% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
711
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
86.3%
+46.3% vs TC avg
§102
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 691 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the communication filed on 2/29/2024. Claims 1-10, 14-19 are pending in this application. Examiner Note The examiner is here to serve, to assist, and to help applicant to the very best of his ability. The Primary Patent Examiner position is a position of serving and it is an honor to externally serve the applicant and attorney and to internally serve junior examiners and supervisors. The goal of the examiner is to work with and assist applicant to move cases along as efficiently as possible. Applicant is encouraged to call examiner to schedule an interview if applicant has any questions about this action, wants to discuss any possible paths forward, has proposed amendments to the claims to run by the examiner, or for any other issues that applicant would like to discuss. Examiner can normally be reached at (571) 270-3863 or michael.keller@uspto.gov, Monday-Friday, from about 6 AM - 10 PM EST and if your call is missed examiner will try to return call quickly, thank you. Priority This application claims priority of CN202111151906.X, filed 9/29/2021. The assignee of record is DATANG MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT CO., LTD. The listed inventor(s) is/are: ZHANG, Mingzhu; NI, Chunlin. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 2/29/2024, 10/10/2024, 4/16/2025 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the IDS(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 15, 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claims recite “a computer readable and writable storage medium…” The claims fail to place the invention squarely within one statutory class of invention. Based on the broadest reasonable interpretation of the term “a computer readable and writable storage medium …” the term is not limited to non-transitory computer readable storage media, and may include transitory media. The transitory media generally stores/encodes/transmits data/information in form of signals. As such, the claim is drawn to a signal per se. Signal per se does not appear to be a process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter. [Claims that recite nothing but the physical characteristics of a form of energy, such as frequency, voltage or the strength of a magnetic field, define energy or magnetism, per se, and as such are nonstatutory natural phenomena. O'Reilly, 56 U. S. (15 How.) at 112-14. See also In re Nuijten. Docket no. 2006-1371 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 20, 2007)(slip. Op. at 18): "A propagating signal is not a process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter"] Wording such as non-transitory computer-readable storage media would overcome the rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10, 14-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by 3GPP (QoE Handling during UE Mobility, 3GPP R2-2101190; hereinafter 3GPP190) For Claim 1, 3GPP190 teaches a method for QoE configuration during an RRC resume process, applied to a first network side apparatus, comprising: obtaining Quality of Experience, QoE, configuration information of a terminal during a Radio Resource Control, RRC, resume process of the terminal (3GPP190 2.1 Mobility in RRC INACTIVE); and determining a first QoE configuration according to the QoE configuration information (3GPP190 2.1 Proposal 1), and instructing the terminal to release the first QoE configuration (3GPP190 2.1 Proposal 2). For Claim 2, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the QoE configuration information comprises at least one of: a QoE configuration with measurement enabled; or a QoE configuration without measurement enabled (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 3, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the obtaining the QoE configuration information of the terminal during the RRC resume process of the terminal, comprises: receiving an RRC resume request message transmitted by the terminal (3GPP190 2.1); and obtaining the QoE configuration information of the terminal from the terminal or a second network side apparatus, wherein the second network side apparatus is a network side apparatus that configures QoE configuration for the terminal (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 4, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 3, wherein the obtaining the QoE configuration information of the terminal from the terminal or the second network side apparatus, comprises: transmitting a QoE configuration information request to the terminal or the second network side apparatus; and receiving the QoE configuration information transmitted by the terminal or the second network side apparatus according to the QoE configuration information request (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 5, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the QoE configuration information comprises at least one of: complete first QoE configuration parameter information received from the second network side apparatus; or second QoE configuration parameter information only visible to an Access Stratum, AS (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 6, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 5, wherein the second QoE configuration parameter information comprises at least one of: at least one of: a service type corresponding to QoE configuration, identification information of QoE configuration, a priority of a service type corresponding to QoE configuration, a priority of identification information of QoE configuration, a Qos configuration type, a cache state of QoE configuration, or a playing delay of QoE configuration; at least one of: a service type corresponding to a QoE configuration type based on signaling, identification information of QoE configuration based on signaling, a priority of a service type based on signaling, a priority of identification information of QoE configuration based on signaling, a priority of the Qos configuration type based on signaling, a cache state of QoE configuration based on signaling, or a playing delay of QoE configuration based on signalling; or at least one of: a service type corresponding to a QoE configuration type based on management, identification information of QoE configuration based on management, a priority Filed Herewith of a service type based on management, a priority of identification information of QoE configuration based on management, a priority of the Qos configuration type based on management, a cache state of QoE configuration based on management, or a playing delay of QoE configuration based on management (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 7, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the first QoE configuration according to the QoE configuration information, comprises at least one of: determining a service type of the first QoE configuration according to the QoE configuration information; determining identification information of the first QoE configuration according to the QoE configuration information; determining a priority of a service type of the first QoE configuration according to the QoE configuration information; determining a priority of identification information of the first QoE configuration according to the QoE configuration information; or determining a first QoE configuration type according to the QoE configuration information (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 8, 3GPP190 teaches a method for QoE configuration during an RRC resume process, applied to a terminal, comprising: transmitting QoE configuration information of the terminal to a first network side apparatus during the RRC resume process; receiving a release instruction transmitted by the first network side apparatus, wherein the release instruction comprises a first QoE configuration; and releasing the first QoE configuration according to the release instruction (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 9, 3GPP190 teaches the method according to claim 8, wherein the releasing the first QoE configuration according to the release instruction, comprises at least one of: Filed Herewith releasing, according to a service type of the first QoE configuration in the release instruction, a QoE configuration corresponding to the service type; releasing, according to identification information of the first QoE configuration in the release instruction, a QoE configuration corresponding to the identification information; releasing, according to a priority of a service type of the first QoE configuration in the release instruction, a QoE configuration corresponding to the priority of the service type; releasing, according to a priority of identification information of the first QoE configuration in the release instruction, a QoE configuration corresponding to the priority of the identification information; or releasing, according to a first QoE configuration type in the release instruction, a QoE configuration corresponding to the configuration type (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim 10, 3GPP190 teaches a method for QoE configuration during an RRC resume process, applied to a second network side apparatus, comprising: performing a QoE configuration for a terminal; and transmitting QoE configuration information of the terminal to a first network side apparatus during the RRC resume process of the terminal, wherein the first network side apparatus is an apparatus that performs RRC resume connection with the terminal (3GPP190 2.1). For Claim(s) 14, the claim(s) is/are substantially similar to claim 1 and therefore is/are rejected for the same reasoning set forth above. For Claim(s) 15, the claim(s) is/are substantially similar to claim 1 and therefore is/are rejected for the same reasoning set forth above. For Claim(s) 16, the claim(s) is/are substantially similar to claim 8 and therefore is/are rejected for the same reasoning set forth above. For Claim(s) 17, the claim(s) is/are substantially similar to claim 10 and therefore is/are rejected for the same reasoning set forth above. For Claim(s) 18, the claim(s) is/are substantially similar to claim 8 and therefore is/are rejected for the same reasoning set forth above. For Claim(s) 19, the claim(s) is/are substantially similar to claim 10 and therefore is/are rejected for the same reasoning set forth above. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is listed below, thank you: i. US 20200022034 A1, Method And Network Nodes To Manage QoE Measurement Collection During Relocation Or Handover Conclusion Any inquiry concerning communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael Keller at (571)270-3863 or michael.keller@uspto.gov. If attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Gillis can be reached on 571-272-7952. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL A KELLER/ Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2446
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641457
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ACQUIRING MEASUREMENT INFORMATION FOR TERMINAL
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641490
ADAPTIVE SPECTRUM CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634735
OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REPORTING VIA HOST LEVEL NORTHBOUND PERFORMANCE REPORTING AGENT
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12632300
Optimizing Virtual Storage System Architectures
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627950
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTICAST AND BROADCAST SERVICES
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 691 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month