Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/688,389

NANOTECHNOLOGY FOR CHEMOTHERA0PY DRUG CAPTURE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 01, 2024
Priority
Oct 07, 2021 — provisional 63/253,250 +2 more
Examiner
JOHNSON, DANIELLE D
Art Unit
1617
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The Penn State Research Foundation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
323 granted / 722 resolved
-15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
776
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
88.9%
+48.9% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 722 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 3, 4, 9 and 20 were amended in the preliminary amendment filed 3/1/2024. Claims 1-20 are pending. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II, claims 7-14 in the reply filed on 3/11/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-6 and 15-20 are withdrawn. Claims 7-14 are under examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 3/1/2024 and 8/13/2024 are compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 7 recites “disposed with in the depot” should be changed to “disposed within the depot”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “comprises electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose, wherein the electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose binds at least 1000 mg of doxorubicin per gram of electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose when the electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose is contacted with a fluid comprising doxorubicin” which is indefinite. It is unclear if the composition necessarily includes doxorubicin as a structural limitation to the composition or if the binding property is just an inherent feature of the electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose alone. For the purpose of examination the composition in the medical device comprises only the electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose and the binding property of being capable of binding doxorubicin is just an inherent feature. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sarikhani et al. (Chemotherapy Drug Capture Device Based-on Nanocellulose/Silk Fibroin Microparticle, January 2020, pages 1-40). Applicant claims a medical device comprising a depot, a composition comprising electrosterically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose (ENCC) disposed within the depot; a first conduit having a first end adapted to capture fluid and a second end coupled to the depot. (Claim 7) Sarikhani discloses a chemotherapy drug capturing device for intravenous absorption of doxorubicin which is fabricated with electrostatically stabilized nanocrystalline cellulose (ENCC) which have anionic groups that bind doxorubicin (DOX) (page 2, paragraph 1). The device is designed to be placed into venous artery and capture doxorubicin that is in outflow of the venous flow (page 3, Figure 1). Sarikhani shows that the device is fabricated into a microfluidic device using molded PDMS with inlet and outlet holes bonded with microchannel (page 5, paragraph 1). Microbeads were fabricated comprising silk fibroin and ENCC and concentration was optimized for maximum DOX capturing (page 6, paragraph 2). The device comprises an inlet for the aqueous phase of silk fibroin and ENCC, continuous flow (oil/surfactant) inlets and outlet for collecting microbeads and is illustrated in Figures 2 and 3 (limitation of claims 8-13). PNG media_image1.png 334 716 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 204 676 media_image2.png Greyscale The device inherently comprises a first conduit that captures the fluid and a second end coupled to the depot. With respect to claims 7 and 14, Sarikhani is silent to being capable of binding at least 1000 mg of DOX, preferably at least 6000 mg of DOX per gram of ENCC but this appears to be directed to intended use because this does not result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art. Conclusion No claims allowed. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Dang et al. (CA 3159930; published July 26, 2018) teach a medical infusion device comprising a cannula/catheter adapted for subcutaneous insertion, a fluid conduit adapted to deliver the solution from a medical reservoir to the site of infusion and a depot in operable contact with the fluid conduit (abstract). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIELLE D JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)270-3285. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am-5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bethany Barham can be reached at 571-272-6175. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DANIELLE D. JOHNSON Examiner Art Unit 1611 /BETHANY P BARHAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1611
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12660824
ACCELERATED PLANT GROWTH REGULATING AND IMPROVED FUNGICIDE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12648568
BIOMATERIAL-BASED COMPOSITIONS TO DELIVER PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING MICROBES
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12648559
TOPICAL MOSQUITO CONTROL PRODUCT WITH SUNSCREEN
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12616202
AGRICULTURAL FORMULATIONS, USES THEREOF AND PROCESSES FOR PREPARATION THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617760
[(5-PHENYL-1-HETEROARYL-1H-TRIAZOL-3-YL)OXY] ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVES AS SAFENERS FOR THE PROTECTION OF USEFUL PLANTS AND CROP PLANTS
3y 0m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+12.4%)
4y 0m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 722 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month