Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/688,404

LONGITUDINAL-WIRE GUIDE FOR ADVANCING A NUMBER OF PARALLEL STEEL WIRES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 30, 2024
Priority
Sep 02, 2021 — AT A 50699/2021 +1 more
Examiner
SONG, HIMCHAN
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Evg Entwicklungs- U Verwertungs-Gesellschaft M B H
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
216 granted / 252 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
262
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
64.2%
+24.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 252 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Summary This communication is a First Office Action Non-Final Rejection on the merits. Claim(s) 5-8 is/are currently pending and considered below. Claim Objections Claim(s) 5-7 is/are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5, “a lower longitudinal wire guide lever (LW guide lever)” should read -- a lower longitudinal wire guide lever (lower LW guide lever) -- Claim 5, “an upper longitudinal wire guide lever (LW guide lever)” should read -- an upper longitudinal wire guide lever (upper LW guide lever) -- Claim 5, “between the two” should read -- between the lower LW guide lever and the upper LW guide lever-- Claim 5, “a lateral longitudinal wire guide (LW guide)” should read -- a lateral longitudinal wire guide (lateral LW guide) -- Claim 6, “on which they can be” should read -- one which the plurality of fittings can be -- Claim 7, “the lower LW guide levers as well as upper LW guide levers” should read -- the lower LW guide lever as well as the upper LW guide lever -- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claim 6, introduction of “in a Z direction essentially perpendicular to the Y and X directions” renders the claim indefinite because one having ordinary skill in the art cannot ascertain the scope of the claim bounded by the relative term “essentially perpendicular”; furthermore, Specification does not provide reasonable range that would be considered “essentially perpendicular”. See MPEP 2173.05(b). For the purposes of examination, “essentially perpendicular to” is interpreted as “perpendicular to”. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 5 and 7-8 is/are objected to due to informalities analyzed above, but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the objections. Claim(s) 6 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claims in this application have been allowed because the prior art of record fails to disclose or make obvious the claimed invention including the following features: “a plurality of fittings consisting of a lower longitudinal wire guide lever (LW guide lever), an upper longitudinal wire guide lever (LW guide lever), a compression spring acting between the two”. The closest prior art of record, Anagnostopoulos to US 2018/0056364 A1, discloses a longitudinal wire guide (Figs. 10A-D) for feeding a set of parallel steel wires in a predetermined X direction, having a plurality of fittings (72) consisting of a lateral longitudinal wire guide (71), wherein the fittings are arranged so as to be continuously displaceable relative to one another in a Y direction perpendicular to the X direction (Figs. 4A and 10A, para 218 and 252), and wherein the plurality of fittings is arranged on a carriage which can be driven in the X direction (para 257). However, Anagnostopoulos and other prior art of record (see PTO-892 mailed herewith) fail to disclose of fairly suggest the plurality of fittings consisting of a lower longitudinal wire guide lever (LW guide lever), an upper longitudinal wire guide lever (LW guide lever), a compression spring acting between the two. The combination of the claimed limitations are novel and found to be allowable over the prior art. The cited references taken singly or in combination do not anticipate or make obvious the Applicant's claimed invention. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure (See PTO-892 Notice of References Cited). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Himchan Song whose telephone number is (571)272-4142. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at (571) 270-1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HIMCHAN SONG/Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2024
Application Filed
May 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636009
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SURGICAL SYSTEM DURING TISSUE TREATMENT MOTION
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637246
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED PACKAGING AND PROCESSING CONTAINERS FOR SHIPPING WITH PLACE STACK TRANSFER MANAGEMENT
1y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629477
VACUUM INSERTION METHODS FOR INSERTING LUBRICANT FREE SYRINGE STOPPERS AND A SYSTEM FOR ASSEMBLING SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630322
AUTOMATED MEDICATION BAGGER SYSTEM, METHODS, AND APPARATUS
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623802
Food Assembly And Packaging Robot
1y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 252 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month