Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/689,090

SATELLITE WATCHING SYSTEM, SATELLITE INFORMATION TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, WATCHING SATELLITE, INFRASTRUCTURE SATELLITE, BIDIRECTIONAL COMMUNICATION STANDARD TERMINAL, WATCHING CENTER, DATA RELAY SATELLITE, CISLUNAR DATA RELAY SATELLITE, AND FREIGHTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — JP 2021-160609 +1 more
Examiner
EL CHANTI, HUSSEIN A
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
869 granted / 1028 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1044
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1028 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 1. This action is responsive to restriction election received March 24, 2026. Claim 14 was elected without traverse. Restriction is made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2. Claims 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0319350 (referred to hereafter as Wang) in view of Rogers et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2021/0078736 (referred to hereafter as Rogers). As to claim 14, Wang teaches a satellite information transmission system comprising: a critical infrastructure including an infrastructure satellite cluster including infrastructure satellites to fly in a cislunar space that is a space between the moon and the earth or beyond the moon, to form social infrastructure, and to put a service into practice (see fig. 2, para. 54-55, 57, DRO flies in cislunar space); and a ground installation installed on ground to exchange information with the infrastructure satellite cluster and to operate the infrastructure satellite cluster, wherein the infrastructure satellite cluster includes a cislunar data relay satellite to relay communication between a space object flying in a near-moon orbit and the ground (see fig. 2, para. 54-55, 57, DRO communicates with ground station using GEO and MEO), the infrastructure satellite exchanges satellite information with the cislunar satellite, and the cislunar satellite exchanges the satellite information with the ground installation via the cislunar data relay satellite (see fig. 2, para. 54-55, 57, DRO flies in cislunar space). Wang does not explicitly teach that the infrastructure satellite exchanges satellite information with the cislunar satellite wherein the cislunar satellite is a freighter and the critical infrastructure includes a cislunar freighter that has a consolidated environment of communication with the cislunar data relay satellite and that transports commodities to the cislunar space, the cislunar freighter transports the infrastructure satellite to the cislunar space and thereafter releases the infrastructure satellite. However, Rogers teaches a freighter satellite wherein a cislunar freighter that has a consolidated environment of communication with the cislunar data relay satellite and that transports commodities to the cislunar space, the cislunar freighter transports the infrastructure satellite to the cislunar space and thereafter releases the infrastructure satellite (see para. 13-14, 32 and 37-38). It would have been obvious for one of the ordinary skill in the at the effective filling data of the application use a freighter satellite wherein a cislunar freighter that has a consolidated environment of communication with the cislunar data relay satellite and that transports commodities to the cislunar space, the cislunar freighter transports the infrastructure satellite to the cislunar space and thereafter releases the infrastructure satellite in Wang as taught by Rogers. Motivation to do so comes from the teachings of Wang that doing so would allow the freighter to move satellites/spaceships from a lower orbit to a lunar orbit in an efficient manner. 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HUSSEIN A EL CHANTI whose telephone number is (571)272-3999. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Navid Mehdizadeh can be reached at 571-272-7691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HUSSEIN ELCHANTI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679381
METHOD AND CONTROL UNIT
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673698
SYSTEM AND METHOD TO VALIDATE MARSHALING INSTRUCTIONS RECEIVED BY INFRASTRUCTURE ENABLED MARSHALING SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671253
STRUCTURE FOR COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT OPTIMIZATION FOR REAL TIME MICROGRID DISPATCH
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668182
VEHICLE OBSTACLE ALARM DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661994
Using ‘Dynamic Regenerative Braking’ to Enhance Crash Avoidance
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 7m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1028 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month