Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/689,549

EMBEDDED PRODUCT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION, STORAGE AND/OR HANDLING OF LANTHANIDES OR ACTINIDES AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 06, 2024
Priority
Sep 10, 2021 — EU 21196057.0 +1 more
Examiner
DIGGS, TANISHA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) Represented By The European Commission
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
401 granted / 730 resolved
-5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +54% interview lift
Without
With
+53.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
766
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 730 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 7 recites “[hereinafter saccharide (S)]”, this renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear if this limitation is part of the claim. Claims 2-15 are subsumed under the rejection. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites “selected from the group consisting of monosaccharide and disaccharide, preferably is selected from the group consisting of glucose, mannose, fructose and sucrose, more preferably the saccharide (S) is sucrose.”; “preferably” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites “, preferably equal to or more than 70.0wt%, preferably equal to or more than 80.0wt%, more preferably equal to or more than 90.0wt%, and more preferably the matrix material consists essentially of the saccharide (S).”; “preferably” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 5 recites “, more preferably greater than or equal to 2.0, even more preferably greater than or equal to 4.0”; “preferably” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites “, preferably by a solution of nitric acid at a concentration of between 1 M and 8 M.”; “preferably” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12, line 2 recites “[herein-after sample (SA)]”, this renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear if this limitation is part of the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: There is found no support or guidance to provide the instant inventions. The closest prior art of record, Toth et al (Research on long-term stability of mixed U and Pu large-sized dried (LSD) spikes for fissile material control) only teaches uranium and plutonium embedded into cellulose matrix, and fails to teach at least 60wt% of a matrix material comprising more than 55wt% of a saccharide and a lanthanide, actinide or compound thereof with a molar ratio of saccharide to lanthanide, actinide or compound thereof is greater than 1.5. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TANISHA DIGGS whose telephone number is (571)270-7730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday, Tuesday and Friday, 9:00AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at (571) 272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TANISHA DIGGS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 July 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685887
FIRE EXTINGUISHING MICRO-CAPSULE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND FIRE EXTINGUISHER INCLUDING SAME
4y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683207
METHODS FOR PREPARING CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL PRECURSOR MATERIAL AND CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, AND CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY PREPARED ACCORDING TO SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679982
INTUMESCENT FIRE-RETARDANT AND ANTI-CORROSIVE COATING MODIFIED BY POLYANILINE-SILICON CARBIDE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668681
Nanocomposite Flame Retardant, Flame Retardant Bismaleimide Resin and Preparation Method Thereof
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12637542
SELF-FLAME-RETARDANT COPOLYESTERAMIDE
4y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+53.9%)
3y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 730 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month