Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/690,100

Connector Assembly

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 07, 2024
Priority
Sep 16, 2021 — provisional 63/244,886 +1 more
Examiner
TA, THO DAC
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1349 granted / 1561 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1571
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1561 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed (NOTE: applicants have not responded to this objection from the previous Office Action).. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 29-33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gaul et al. (US 20120071017 A1). Regarding claim 29, Gaul et al. discloses a connector 4, comprising: a housing 4a that defines a recess (see annotated drawing below) that is configured to receive a retaining structure 14 of a corresponding connector 2 of a device to mate the connector 4 to the corresponding connector 2; a release 8, 10, wherein, when the connector 4 is mated with the corresponding connector 2 of the device, operation of the release is configured to displace the retaining structure 14 from the recess; and electrical contacts 16 that are located on an exterior surface of the housing 4a and are configured for conductive engagement with the corresponding connector 2 of the device when the connector 4 is mated with the corresponding connector 2 of the device. Regarding claim 30, Gaul et al. discloses when the connector 4 is mated with the corresponding connector 2 of the device, the recess is configured to engage the retaining structure 14 of the corresponding connector 2 of the device to prevent removal of the connector 4 from the corresponding connector 2 of the device. Regarding claim 31, Gaul et al. discloses the recess extends transverse to an insertion direction in which the connector 4 is inserted into the corresponding connector 2 of the device. Regarding claim 32, Gaul et al. discloses the housing 4a includes an end surface (see annotated drawing below) that is configured to engage the retaining structure 14 of the corresponding connector 2 of the device to allow insertion of the connector 4 into the corresponding connector 2 of the device. Regarding claim 33, Gaul et al. discloses the release 8 is a button. [AltContent: textbox (end surface)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: textbox (recess)][AltContent: connector] PNG media_image1.png 878 866 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7, 10, 21-23, 25 are allowed. Claims 34-36 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 29-33 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THO D. TA whose telephone number is (571)272-2014. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-4:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached at (571) 272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Tdt 9/20/2026 /THO D TA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 04, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 29, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740592
E-Cigarette
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738675
CONNECTOR SUITABLE TO HOLD A BUSBAR IN CONTACT WITH AN ELECTRODE OF A BATTERY, SYSTEM AND METHOD AND BATTERY SET
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738701
ENERGY STORAGE CONNECTOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738688
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH ERGONOMIC AXIAL MATING ASSIST DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727621
FLAVOR GENERATION DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING FLAVOR GENERATION DEVICE, AND PROGRAM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.2%)
1y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1561 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month