Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/690,105

PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 13, 2024
Examiner
BRUSHABER, FREDERICK M
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
526 granted / 586 resolved
+37.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
611
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 586 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 2/6/2025 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Conforms with 35 USC § 101 The presently examined claims were evaluated for a 101 Alice type rejection. The conclusion from going through the Alice/Mayo test is that the independent claims are integrated into a practical application (or cannot be performed merely with the human mind) and are therefore patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101. See MPEP §2106, subsection III and MPEP §2106.04, subsection II(A). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 20190061740 A1 hereinafter Ohira. Claim 1, Ohira discloses a parking assistance device comprising: a route setting part that sets a movement route of a vehicle; and a control part that controls the vehicle by changing an acceleration depending on a distance between a starting position of the vehicle in the movement route and a stopping position of the vehicle in the movement route. (paragraphs [0059-0092]: "[0059] The route generation unit 404 generates g moving route 501 for guiding the reference position G of the vehicle 1 to the target parking position N. The distance calculation unit 405 calculates a target distance of the moving route 501. In the present embodiment, the parking assistance device 400 performs steering, braking, and acceleration/deceleration control so as to move the vehicle 1 as much as the calculated target distance. In the present embodiment, the brake and acceleration/deceleration control is mainly described, but steering control according to a moved distance of the vehicle 1 is also assumed to be performed ... [0061] Fig. 6 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a relationship between a target vehicle speed and an elapsed time set by the parking assistance device in the related art. In the example illustrated in Fig. 6 . it is assumed that a target distance is 8 m and a control cycle Ts is 1 second. The target vehicle speed calculation unit 406 calculates the target vehicle speed for each control cvcle Ts (1 second). [0063] In the example illustrated in Fig. 6, at the time of acceleration of the vehicle, the parking assistance device increases the target vehicle speed in accordance with the set acceleration aplus(0.1 m/sec) for each control cycle Ts (1 second). Thereafter, the parking assistance device sets the maximum vehicle speed Vmaxas the target vehicle speed and moves the vehicle at the target vehicle speed. Thereafter, at the time of deceleration of the vehicle, the parking assistance device reduces the target vehicle speed in accordance with the set deceleration aminus(-0. 1 m/sec) that can be output when the parking assistance is performed for every control cycle Ts (1 second). [0065] Fig. 8 is an exemplary diagram illustrating a change of the vehicle speed at the time of deceleration of the vehicle. As illustrated in Fig. 8, a movement distance D from the current vehicle position to the stop position of the vehicle at the time of deceleration of the vehicle is calculated by Equation (1). D = 1 I 2 a minus· Ts 2 n n + 1; figures 5-11"). Claim 2, Ohira discloses wherein the control part performs braking control of the vehicle using a plurality of decelerations set to decrease as the distance between the starting position and the stopping position decreases [Fig. 11]. PNG media_image1.png 303 363 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 3, Ohira discloses wherein the plurality of decelerations are a first deceleration when the distance is equal to or greater than a threshold, and a second deceleration when the distance is less than the threshold, the second deceleration being smaller than the first deceleration [Fig. 13 and related text]. Claim 4, Ohira discloses wherein when the distance is less than the threshold, the control part starts a deceleration operation at a timing earlier than when the distance is equal to or greater than the threshold [Fig. 13]. Claim 5, Ohira discloses comprising a target speed setting part that sets a target speed between the starting position and the stopping position, wherein the control part: increases, when the distance between the starting position and the stopping position is less than a distance threshold, a driving force of the vehicle at a first change rate in starting the vehicle; increases, when the distance is equal to or greater than the distance threshold and the target speed is equal to or greater than a speed threshold, the driving force at a second change rate larger than the first change rate in starting the vehicle; and increases, when the distance is equal to or greater than the distance threshold and the target speed is less than the speed threshold, the driving force at the first change rate [Fig. 13 and Fig. 12 and related text Step 1205 is Fig. 13. Fig. 13 determines the speed with thresholds those are applied based on distance from Fig. 12]. Claim 6, Ohira discloses wherein the control part: reduces, when the distance is less than the distance threshold, a braking force of the vehicle at a third change rate in starting the vehicle; reduces, when the distance is equal to or greater than the distance threshold and the target speed is equal to or greater than the speed threshold, the braking force at a fourth change rate larger than the third change rate in starting the vehicle; and reduces, when the distance is equal to or greater than the distance threshold and the target speed is less than the speed threshold, the braking force at the third change rate [Fig. 13 and Fig. 12 and related text Step 1205 is Fig. 13. Fig. 13 determines the speed with thresholds those are applied based on distance from Fig. 12]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20150375740 A1 The parking support device has a calculation unit (17) that calculates the speed pattern that causes a vehicle to travel along a traveling route from a current position of the vehicle to a target parking position. An acceleration recognition unit (13) recognizes the driver-requested acceleration regarding the vehicle based on an accelerator operation performed by the driver of the vehicle. A control unit (19) controls the parking support in the target parking position based on the speed pattern and the traveling route. US 20180265079 A1 The device (102) has a trajectory plan unit (150) is configured to determine a limit stop position corresponding to a limit position to which an own vehicle travels along a traveling direction indicated by a target trajectory forward over a target stop position included in a target trajectory, when a driver performs a driving operation in a parking operation. A control unit (146,152) is configured to perform acceleration in accordance with the driving operation by the driver under a condition that a distance to the target stop position from a position of the own vehicle when the driving operation is performed is larger than a predetermined distance. The control unit is configured to perform deceleration so that the own vehicle stops in a range to the limit stop position after the acceleration. The examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record in the body of this action for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. Applicant should consider the entire prior art as applicable as to the limitations of the claims. It is respectfully requested from the applicant, in preparing the response, to consider fully the entire references as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FREDERICK M BRUSHABER whose telephone number is (313)446-4839. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hunter Lonsberry can be reached at (571) 272-7298. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FREDERICK M BRUSHABER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 27, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603090
METHODS AND VEHICLES FOR CAPTURING EMOTION OF A HUMAN DRIVER AND CUSTOMIZING VEHICLE RESPONSE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588592
TRAINING METHOD FOR AN AGRICULTURAL VEHICLE AUTOMATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583485
DRIVING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, DRIVING ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING DRIVING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570315
MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL DEVICE, MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560436
NAVIGATION VIDEO GENERATION AND ACQUISITION METHODS AND APPARATUSES, SERVER, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 586 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month