Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/691,068

CARRIER PLATFORM, DETECTION DEVICE AND BASE THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 12, 2024
Priority
Jan 16, 2023 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2023072427
Examiner
NEJAD, MAHDI H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
466 granted / 631 resolved
+13.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
661
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-6, 13, 18, 19 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 recites the limitation “any suction nozzle” in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Because “a suction nozzle” is earlier recited and not a plurality of them. Claim 18 recites “in a case that the base is connected with the carrier platform, the two sets of prism components are capable of being accommodated in two prism avoidance cavities in a one-to-one correspondence”. It is not clear if connection of the base to the carrier platform is claimed or is optional. Claim 21 is rejected due to dependency on claim 18. Claim 19 recites “in a case that the carrier platform is connected with the base, the transfer circuit is capable of being electrically connected to the crimping joint”. It is not clear if connection of the platform to the base is claimed or is optional. Claim 4 recites “the air chamber structure comprises an elastic hollow ball, an elastic air bag, a resilient box or a resilient cylinder”. It is not clear if the claim intended to be a Markush Claim and applicant intended to claim the air chamber structure is selected from a group consisting of an elastic hollow ball, an elastic air bag, a resilient box and a resilient cylinder. Examination is conducted in this manner. Claims 5-6 are rejected due to dependency on rejected claim 4. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 16, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Li (CN 206248698 U). Regarding claim 1, Li teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below and machine translated document attached) a carrier platform (entire Fig. 1), comprising: a carrier unit (703), configured to carry a display module; PNG media_image1.png 76 886 media_image1.png Greyscale a suction nozzle (vacuum hole 702), disposed on the carrier unit; and a negative pressure assembly (negative pressure assembly comprises vacuum chuck and vacuum switch control button 109), configured to provide a negative pressure to the suction nozzle to enable the suction nozzle to adsorb the display module located on the carrier unit. PNG media_image2.png 122 904 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 988 1497 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 16, Li teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the carrier platform further comprises a crimping table (table to which crimping pressing assembly 400 is connected to) provided with a crimping joint (entire toggle clamp shown in Fig. 3); a flexible circuit board of the display module (flexible electronic paper display module) is capable of being crimped with the crimping joint; and wherein the crimping table is detachably connected to the carrier unit. PNG media_image4.png 44 902 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 88 896 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, Li teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) a carrier platform (entire Fig. 1), comprising: a carrier unit (703), configured to carry a display module; PNG media_image1.png 76 886 media_image1.png Greyscale a suction nozzle (vacuum hole 702), disposed on the carrier unit; and a negative pressure assembly (negative pressure assembly comprises vacuum chuck and vacuum switch control button 109), configured to provide a negative pressure to the suction nozzle to enable the suction nozzle to adsorb the display module located on the carrier unit. PNG media_image2.png 122 904 media_image2.png Greyscale the carrier platform further comprises a crimping table (table to which crimping pressing assembly 400 is connected to) provided with a crimping joint (entire toggle clamp shown in Fig. 3); a flexible circuit board of the display module (flexible electronic paper display module) is capable of being crimped with the crimping joint; and wherein the crimping table is detachably connected to the carrier unit; PNG media_image4.png 44 902 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 88 896 media_image5.png Greyscale the base is equipped with a replaceable transfer circuit (the flexible electronic paper display module placing platform (701) is further equipped with a quartz glass block of transparent structure (704) is set a flexible electronic paper display module is placed on the platform (701)). Regarding claim 20, Li teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the base is provided with a plurality of sets of positioning connection components, and the carrier platform is detachably connected to the base through the positioning connection components (by sliding of four 705 inside four positioning connection components); and different positioning connection components are capable of being detachably connected to different carrier platforms (carrier unit shown in Fig. 6 can be removed and replaced with another carrier unit). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9, 11, 13, 18 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yuan (CN 212321042 U) in view of Wang (CN 103904011 A). Regarding claim 1, Yuan teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below and machine translated document attached) a carrier platform (61), comprising: a carrier unit (bearing table 62), configured to carry a display module (display screen 50); (Figures of Yuan show the display screen is held on surface 62 with plurality of holes which appear to be suction holes, but specification is silent regarding this). PNG media_image6.png 927 829 media_image6.png Greyscale Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below and machine translated document attached) a suction nozzle (suction nozzle 210) on a carrier unit (disc/chuck 100); a negative pressure assembly (assembly shown in Fig. 3), configured to provide a negative pressure to the suction nozzle to enable the suction nozzle to adsorb the display module (silicon wafer 300) located on the carrier unit. PNG media_image7.png 160 904 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 832 1051 media_image8.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly of Wang in carrier platform of Yuan. Doing so would fully grip the display module during processing and would also reduce the warpage of the display module by forcing it down to the carrier unit during the processing. Regarding claim 2, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the suction nozzle and the negative pressure assembly as stated in rejection of claim 1 above and further teaches the negative pressure assembly comprises an air chamber structure (air chamber structure comprises at least second air chamber 236 connected to negative pressure source and spring 234) and a negative pressure control member (piston 232), the air chamber structure is equipped with an air chamber with a variable capacity (capacity of 236 is variable by movement of piston 232), and the negative pressure control member is configured to control a capacity change of the air chamber to control whether to generate the negative pressure. PNG media_image9.png 152 914 media_image9.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add suction nozzle, negative pressure assembly, air chamber structure and negative pressure control member of Wang in carrier platform of Yuan. Doing so would fully grip the display module during processing and would also reduce the warpage of the display module by forcing it down to the carrier unit during the processing. Regarding claim 3, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the suction nozzle and the negative pressure assembly as stated in rejection of claim 1 above and further teaches the air chamber structure is elastic (by spring 234 of the air chamber structure), and the negative pressure control member is configured to compress the air chamber structure to compress the air chamber (by downward movement); and the compressed air chamber structure is capable of rebounding under action of elasticity (spring 234 moves the piston 232/negative pressure control member upward and therefore the compressed air chamber structure is rebounded) to cause the air chamber to rebound and generate the negative pressure. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add suction nozzle, negative pressure assembly, air chamber structure and negative pressure control member of Wang in carrier platform of Yuan. Doing so would fully grip the display module during processing and would also reduce the warpage of the display module by forcing it down to the carrier unit during the processing. Regarding claim 11, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the suction nozzle and the negative pressure assembly as stated in rejection of claim 1 above and further teaches a plurality of air chamber structures are provided (three as shown in Fig. 1), and respective air chamber structures are simultaneously controlled by the negative pressure control member. PNG media_image10.png 68 898 media_image10.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add more air control chambers as taught by Wang to be able to vacuum more locations of larger wafers/displays. Regarding claim 7, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the suction nozzle and the negative pressure assembly as stated in rejection of claim 1 above and further teaches a plurality of suction nozzles are provided (three as shown in Fig. 1), a plurality of air chamber structures are provided and have a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of suction nozzles, and any air chamber structure is configured to provide the negative pressure to a corresponding suction nozzle (three similar suction nozzles of Fig. 3). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add more suction nozzles as taught by Wang to be able to vacuum more locations of larger wafers/displays. Regarding claim 9, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the suction nozzle and the negative pressure assembly as stated in rejection of claim 1 above and further teaches the negative pressure control member comprises a push rod (guide post 233 and spring 234), configured to compress or expand the air chamber of the air chamber structure (by spring force). Regarding claim 8, combination of Yuan and Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the carrier platform (61 of Yuan) further comprises a bottom plate (flat large plate of Yuan on which 62 is located), an accommodation cavity is disposed between the bottom plate and the carrier unit, and the air chamber structure (taught by Wang) is accommodated in the accommodation cavity. Regarding claim 13, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the carrier unit is provided with a suction nozzle cavity, and the suction nozzle is accommodated in the suction nozzle cavity (see Figs. 4 and 5); any suction nozzles is a retractable suction nozzle (compare Figs. 3 and 4); the suction nozzle is contractible into the suction nozzle cavity in a first state (shown in Fig. 4); and the suction nozzle is extendable out of the suction nozzle cavity in a second state (shown in Fig. 5). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add suction nozzle, negative pressure assembly, air chamber structure and negative pressure control member of Wang in carrier platform of Yuan. Doing so would fully grip the display module during processing and would also reduce the warpage of the display module by forcing it down to the carrier unit during the processing. Regarding claim 17, Yuan teaches the carrier platform is provided with prism avoidance cavities on both sides of the carrier unit (carrier unit 62 is located on an elevated position relative to the left and right sides which are interpreted to be cavities); and at least part of a base that is cooperated with the carrier platform is provided with a prism component (prism unit 21), and the prism component is capable of being accommodated in a prism avoidance cavity to detect a side of the display module. PNG media_image11.png 88 920 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 50 894 media_image12.png Greyscale Regarding claims 18 and 21, Yuan teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) a carrier platform (61), comprising: a carrier unit (bearing table 62), configured to carry a display module (display screen 50); (Figures of Yuan show the display screen is held on surface 62 with plurality of holes which appear to be suction holes, but specification is silent regarding this); wherein the carrier platform is provided with prism avoidance cavities on both sides of the carrier unit (carrier unit 62 is located on an elevated position relative to the left and right sides which are interpreted to be cavities); and at least part of a base that is cooperated with the carrier platform is provided with a prism component (prism unit 21), and the prism component is capable of being accommodated in a prism avoidance cavity to detect a side of the display module; wherein the base is provided with two sets of prism components (on left and right sides); and a detection device. PNG media_image11.png 88 920 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 50 894 media_image12.png Greyscale Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) a suction nozzle (suction nozzle 210) on a carrier unit (disc/chuck 100); a negative pressure assembly (assembly shown in Fig. 3), configured to provide a negative pressure to the suction nozzle to enable the suction nozzle to adsorb the display module (silicon wafer 300) located on the carrier unit. PNG media_image7.png 160 904 media_image7.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly of Wang in carrier platform of Yuan. Doing so would fully grip the display module during processing and would also reduce the warpage of the display module by forcing it down to the carrier unit during the processing. Regarding claims 4-6, as stated in rejection of claim 1 above, Figures of Yuan do not clearly show the claimed suction nozzle and negative pressure assembly. Wang teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. above and machine translated document attached) the air chamber structure comprises an elastic hollow ball (see the ball 220 with a central hole and a spring 234 underneath); the resilient box comprises a flexible box (piston moves inside the cylinder and makes it flexible) or a foldable box and an elastic member located in the box. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to use biasing hollow ball of Wang in carrier platform of Yuan for buffering purposes. PNG media_image13.png 32 896 media_image13.png Greyscale Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yuan in view of Wang and further in view of Kitawawa (US 20130074873 A1). Regarding claim 12, combined carrier platform of Yuan and Wang does not show the claimed pump and switch. Kitawawa teaches a suction chuck in which controller 4 stops operating the suction pump 51 and switches the on-off valves 52 and 54 respectively to "CLOSE" and "OPEN," thereby releasing the substrate W which is held by suction. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to add negative pressure pump group and control switch group of Kitawawa in combined carrier platform of Yuan and Wang for negative pressure creation and also opening and closing of such negative pressure. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li in view of Hsieh (US 20120261870 A1). Regarding claim 15, Li does not teach the claimed flexible positioning piece. Hsieh teaches vacuum suction device and adhesive tape to fix display to a supporting jig (see par. 0006). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before effective filing date of the claimed invention to ass flexible adhesive along with suction force for fixing display of Li to the carrier unit. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHDI H NEJAD whose telephone number is (571)270-0464. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at (313) 446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MAHDI H. NEJAD Examiner Art Unit 3723 /MAHDI H NEJAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703112
ROBOT HAND
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698188
LOAD-SENSING VEHICLE LIFT
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691359
EDGE SHARPENING TOOL FOR ACRYLIC WAX SCRAPER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692138
PNEUMATIC DISMANTLING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692139
HYDRAULIC JACK ASSEMBLIES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.1%)
2y 10m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month