Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/691,136

A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOORING OF AND SUPPLY ELECTRICAL POWER TO A VESSEL

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 15, 2021 — EU 21196912.6 +1 more
Examiner
TOPOLSKI, MAGDALENA
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kongsberg Maritime AS
OA Round
2 (Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
309 granted / 550 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+41.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
568
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
87.7%
+47.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 550 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (2) as being anticipated by Hystad (US 4458631, cited in IDS). For claim 19, Hystad discloses a vessel connector (3, 19, 20) having a longitudinal axis along which the vessel connector extends, a proximal end (towards 5) configured to receive a mooring connection (bottom part of 3) and a distal end (towards 9) opposite the proximal end, wherein the vessel connector comprising at a distance from the proximal end an elongate section (3) comprising a protrusion (19) arranged closer to the distal end than the elongate section), said protrusion being configured to co-operate with a gripping device (11) comprising two prongs (12) dimensioned and shaped to receive the elongate section while preventing the protrusion two pass in- between the prongs (Col. 3, lines 38-43). For claim 20, Hystad further, wherein the elongated section is flexible/bendable (cable is flexible). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-18, 21 are allowed. The prior art of record fails to teach or suggest the combination of elements as detailed in the claims. While prior art does teach known gripping devices fixedly arranged on ships (see for instance de Baan US 5044297) these fail to teach such a gripping device in combination with a combined mooring and electrical connection including a retractable vessel connector provided at an end thereof. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 05/29/2026 in reference to Hystad have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that, “ the vessel connector is an element extending along a longitudinal axis which comprises an elongate section comprising a protrusion, said vessel connector is configured to receive a mooring connection at one end. Hence, the buoy line #3 of Hystad cannot be equated to being part of the vessel connector of claim 19, as in claim 19, the mooring connection is to be received by the vessel connector and the swage sleeve #19 cannot be equated to the vessel connector as it lacks a suitable protrusion.” This is not found persuasive because the claim does not limit the vessel connector in any manner which would exclude interpretation of the mooring line 3 as part of the vessel connector. The claim does not require a mooring line in addition to the vessel connector, merely that it is configured to receive a mooring connection, the connection of line 3 to anchor 5 is a mooring connection, it is the connection of two elements that allows for mooring of the ship. Accordingly, 3 is considered part of the vessel connector as it connects the anchor 5 to the vessel. The office further notes that “configured to receive” a mooring connection is not a positive limitation of the mooring connection and the line 3 can be connected or tied to multiple objects. The claim further does not positively recite the gripping device, merely an element that can be gripped by one. The claim is extremely broad and ultimately only requires an element that can connect to a vessel including a protrusion. This is shown in elements 3 and 19 of Hystad. Furthermore the office notes that multiple additional references anticipate claim 19. See for instance Claflin (US 3604030) which teaches vessel connector 10 having a protrusion at 28 or de Baan (US 5044297) which teaches vessel connector 3, having a protrusion on top that attaches to gripping device 6, fig. 1-2. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAGDALENA TOPOLSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3568. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 5712705301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAGDALENA TOPOLSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677809
Cephalopod Rearing Method, Cephalopod Rearing Apparatus, Protozoa Prevention Method, and Protozoa Extermination Method
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672617
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VERTICAL HYDROPONIC PLANT CULTIVATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654854
DEVICE FOR RELEASING INSECTS FROM AN AERIAL VEHICLE AND USE THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643671
IMPROVED AIRCRAFT PROPULSION ASSEMBLY
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637394
PAPER MULCH GRANULE WITH FERTILIZER FOR IMPROVED SEED ESTABLISHMENT
3y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+41.4%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 550 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month