Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/691,201

ENDOSCOPY SYSTEM & ELEMENTS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 12, 2024
Examiner
MONAHAN, MEGAN ELIZABETH
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
I Q Endoscopes Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
62 granted / 106 resolved
-11.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
149
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 106 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims In the present application, claims 1-16 are currently pending. Claims 6, 8-11, and 14 have been amended. Claim Objections Claims 1, 8, 10, and 14 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites the limitation “first and second steering wires” in line 2 but references each wire individually throughout the rest of the claim and in the dependent claims. Therefore, for uniformity and clarity of the record, it is suggested to amend the limitation in line 2 of claim 1 to state, “a first steering wire and a second steering wire.” Claim 1 recites the limitation “first and second drive wheel body portions” in line 4 but references each portion individually throughout the rest of the claim and in the dependent claims. Therefore, for uniformity and clarity, it is suggested to amend the limitation in line 4 of claim 1 to state, “a first drive wheel body portion and a second drive wheel body portion.” Claim 8 recites the word “are” in line 2. However Claim 8 has been amended to depend from claim 6. Claim 6 only introduces one flexible arm. Therefore the word should be amended to “is” to be grammatically correct. Claim 10 recites the limitation “third and fourth steering wires” in lines 3-4 but references each wire individually throughout the rest of the claim and in the dependent claims. Therefore for uniformity and clarity of the record, it is suggested to amend the limitation in lines 3-4 of claim 10 to state, “a third steering wire and a fourth steering wire.” Claim 14 recites the limitation “first and second steering wires” in line 4 but references each wire individually throughout the rest of the claim and in the dependent claims. Therefore, for uniformity and clarity of the record, it is suggested to amend the limitation in line 4 of claim 14 to state, “a first steering wire and a second steering wire.” Claim 14 recites the limitation “first and second drive wheel body portions” in lines 6-7 but references each portion individually throughout the rest of the claim and in the dependent claims. Therefore, for uniformity and clarity, it is suggested to amend the limitation in lines 6-7 of claim 14 to state, “a first drive wheel body portion and a second drive wheel body portion.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2 and 6-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the rotational drive wheel" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the first rotational drive wheel.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the rotational drive wheel" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the first rotational drive wheel.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 recites the limitation "said pawl" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “said at least one pawl.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the free end" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “a free end.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the teeth" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “teeth.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7 recites the limitation “each pawl” in line 2. However it is unclear whether the limitation in line 2 is reference to the limitation “a plurality of pawls” previously introduced in line 2 of claim 7, in reference to the limitation “at least one pawl” previously introduced in claim 3, which claim 7 indirectly depends from, or in reference to both. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 7 recites the limitation "said pawls" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “said plurality of pawls.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the flexible arm(s)" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the flexible arm.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the first and second drum elements" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the first drum element and the second drum element.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 recites the limitation "respective steering wire” in lines 2-3 and “the respective steering wire” in line 3. It is unclear whether claim 9 is introducing a new separate steering wire or referencing the first steering wire and the second steering wire previously introduced in claim 1, which claim 9 directly depends from. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the respective drum element" in lines 3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 recites the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). It is suggested to amend the claim to positively claim a mechanical fixing element or a ferrule. Claim 10 recites the limitation “a steering section of an endoscope” in line 3. However Claim 10 directly depends from claim 1. Claim 1 previously introduces the limitation “a steering section of an endoscope” in lines 1-2. Therefore it is unclear whether the limitation in claim 10 is introducing a new “a steering section of an endoscope” or merely referencing the limitation of claim 1. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the steering section of an endoscope.” Examiner is interpreting the limitation as such. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 recites the limitation “first and second drive wheel body portions” in lines 5-6. However claim 1, which claim 10 directly depends from, previously introduces the limitation “first and second drive wheel body portions” in line 4. Therefore it is unclear whether the limitation in claim 10 is introducing new and separate first and second drive wheel body portions or merely referencing the first and second drive wheel body portions previously introduced in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 recites the limitation “a first drum element” in line 6. However claim 1, which claim 10 directly depends from, previously introduces the limitation “a first drum element” in line 5. Therefore, it is unclear whether the limitation in claim 10 is introducing a new and separate first drum element or merely referencing the first drum element previously introduced in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 recites the limitation “a second drum element” in line 7. However claim 1, which claim 10 directly depends from, previously introduces the limitation “a second drum element” in line 6. Therefore, it is unclear whether the limitation in claim 10 is introducing a new and separate second drum element or merely referencing the second drum element previously introduced in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the rotational drive wheel(s)" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the user input control elements" in lines 3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the one or more user input control elements.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the user input control" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the one or more user input control elements.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 12 recites the limitation “a first plane” in line 3. However claim 1, which claim 12 indirectly depends from, previously introduces the limitation “a first plane” in line 2. Therefore it is unclear whether claim 12 is introducing a separate first plane or merely referencing the same first plane previously introduced in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the rotational drive wheel(s)" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 13 recites the limitation “their respective rotatable control wheel(s)” in line 2. It is unclear whether claim 13 is introducing a new and separate rotatable control wheel or merely referencing one of, or both of, the first rotatable control wheel and the second rotatable control wheel previously identified in claim 12. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the rotational drive wheel" in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the first rotational drive wheel.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the first steering wire" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the rotational drive wheel" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the first rotational drive wheel.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the step" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested to amend the limitation to state, “the at least one step.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim 16 recites the limitation "the wires" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8, 9, 11, and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Kunihiko Hijihara (US2017/0238787) hereinafter Hijihara. Regarding Claim 1, Hijihara discloses a steering control mechanism (abstract – operation portion 5) configured for controlling bending of a steering section (Fig. 1 bending portion 2b) of an endoscope (Fig. 1 endoscope 1) in a first plane (up and down plane [0034] “The bending portion 2 b is configured to bend in a vertical direction…”) via first and second steering wires (Fig. 9a wires 8D and 8U) the steering control mechanism (abstract – operation portion 5) comprising: a first rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) comprising first and second drive wheel body portions (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D and rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U), the first drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D) comprising a first drum element (Figs. 79b hole 74) coupled to the first steering wire (Fig.9a wires 8D), and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U)comprising a second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) coupled to the second steering wire (Fig. 9a wires 8U), wherein the rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) is configured to provide one-way relative rotation ([0113-0125]) of the first drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) and the second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74)). Regarding Claim 2, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 1 wherein the rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) comprises a ratchet mechanism ([0113] “…the lid body is turned to a lid body 72A with a ratchet gear in which a plurality of tooth portions 72 g are arrayed in the circumferential direction of the outer peripheral surface, a pulley 60A is provided with a step portion 65, a stop claw 66 is turnably provided in the step portion 65, and the configuration including a ratchet mechanism is attained.”) . Regarding Claim 3, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 2 wherein the ratchet mechanism ([0113]) includes at least one toothed gear surface (Fig. 9a tooth portions 72g), and at least one pawl (Fig. 9a claw 66). Regarding Claim 4, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 3 wherein one of the first drive wheel body portion and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D and rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U) comprises the at least one toothed gear surface (Fig. 9a surface of tooth portions 72g), and the other of the first drive wheel body portion and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D and rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U) comprises the at least one pawl (Fig. 9a claw 66). Regarding Claim 5, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 4 wherein the first drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D) comprises the at least one toothed gear surface (Fig. 9a surface of tooth portions 72g), which is formed as an internal toothed gear surface (Fig. 9a surface of tooth portions 72g). Regarding Claim 6, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 4 wherein the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U) comprises the at least one pawl (Fig. 9a claw 66), said pawl (Fig. 9a claw 66) being provided as part of a flexible arm (Fig. 9a arm part of claw 66), with the free end of the flexible arm being arranged to engage with the teeth of the toothed gear surface ([0113-0114] “…a stop claw 66 is turnably provided in the step portion 65, and the configuration including a ratchet mechanism is attained. Note that the stop claw 66 is urged in a predetermined direction by a torsion spring (not shown in the figure) for example which is an urging member, is engaged with the tooth portions 72 g, and restricts rotation in the predetermined direction.”). Regarding Claim 8, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 6 wherein the flexible arm(s) (Fig. 9a arm part of claw 66) are integrally formed with the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U). Regarding Claim 9, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 1 wherein the first (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) and second drum elements (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) are coupled to their respective steering wire (Fig. 9a wires 8D/8U) by a portion (Fig. 9b portion of wires 8D/U connected to pint 45) of the respective steering wire (Fig. 9a wires 8D/8U) being fixed relative to the respective drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74), optionally via a mechanical fixing element (Fig. 9b pin 45) such as a ferrule. Regarding Claim 11, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 1 further comprising one or more user input control elements (Fig. 1 bending lever 7) arranged to control rotation of the rotational drive wheel(s) (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) based on user input to the user input control elements ([0035-0039]). Regarding Claim 15, Hijihara discloses a method of assembling a steering control mechanism (abstract – operation portion 5), the steering control mechanism (abstract – operation portion 5) comprising: a first rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) comprising first and second drive wheel body portions (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D and rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U), the first drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D) comprising a first drum element (Figs. 79b hole 74) coupled to the first steering wire (Fig.9a wires 8D), and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U)comprising a second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) coupled to the second steering wire (Fig. 9a wires 8U), wherein the rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) is configured to provide one-way relative rotation ([0113-0125]) of the first drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) and the second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74)), and wherein the method includes at least one step ([0119-0125] rotating of main body 73 which has hole 74) of rotating the first drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) relative to the second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74). Regarding Claim 16, Hijihara discloses the method according to claim 15 wherein the step of rotating the first drum element relative to the second drum element ([0119-0125] rotating of main body 73 which has hole 74) is performed to achieve or set a predetermined tension in one or both of the wires forming part of the steering control mechanism ([0124] “…adjusts the tension by arranging, for example, the distal end of the flathead screwdriver in the groove 77, rotating the rotation adjusting member 70A and increasing and decreasing the winding amount of the bending wires 8 u and 8 d. As a result, the tension of the upper bending wire 8 u and the tension of the lower bending wire 8 d can be adjusted to the predetermined state.”). Claims 1, 10, 11, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by Luke T. Jungles (US2018/0028786) hereinafter Jungles. Regarding Claim 1, Jungles discloses a steering control mechanism (abstract – device 100) configured for controlling bending of a steering section (Fig. 1steerable catheter body 104) of an endoscope ([0002] “Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to steerable catheters, including endoscopes.”)) in a first plane ([0024] first plane) via first and second steering wires (Fig. 2 wires 116/118) the steering control mechanism (abstract – device 100) comprising: a first rotational drive wheel (Fig. 2 spool 112) comprising first and second drive wheel body portions (Fig. 2 apertures 124a,b) the first drive wheel body portion (Fig. 2 aperture 124a) comprising a first drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) coupled to the first steering wire (Fig.2 wire 116 [0026]), and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 2 apertures 124b)comprising a second drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) coupled to the second steering wire (Fig. 2 118[0026] ), wherein the rotational drive wheel (Fig. 2 spool 112) is configured to provide one-way relative rotation ([0025-0026]) of the first drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) and the second drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) Regarding Claim 10, Jungles discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 1 wherein the steering control mechanism is further configured to control bending of a steering section of an endoscope in a second plane ([0024] second plane) via third and fourth steering wires (Fig. 2 wires 136/138), the steering control mechanism further comprising: a second rotational drive wheel (Fig. 3 spool 132) comprising respective first and second drive wheel body portions (Fig. 3 gear receptacle 145a/b), the first drive wheel body portion (Fig. 3 gear receptacle 145a) comprising a first drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) coupled to the third steering wire (Fig. 2 wire 136), and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 3 gear receptacle 145b) comprising a second drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) coupled to the fourth steering wire (Fig. 2 wire 138), wherein the second rotational drive wheel (Fig. 3 spool 132) is configured to provide one-way relative rotation ([0128-035]) of its respective first drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150) and second drum element (Fig. 3 gear 150). Regarding Claim 11, Jungles discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 1 further comprising one or more user input control elements (Figs. 1-2 user controlling control wheel 110, 130) arranged to control rotation of the rotational drive wheel(s) (Fig. 3 spool 112, 132) based on user input to the user input control elements (Figs. 1-2 user controlling control wheel 110, 130). Regarding Claim 12, Jungles discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 11 wherein the user input control (Figs. 1-2 user controlling control wheel 110, 130) comprises a first rotatable control wheel (Figs. 1-2 wheel 110) configured to transmit torque to the first rotational drive wheel (Fig. 3 spool 112) to drive bending of the steering section of the endoscope in a first plane ([0024]), and, where a second rotational drive wheel (Fig. 3 spool 132) is present, a second rotatable control wheel (Figs. 1-2 wheel 130) configured to transmit torque to the second rotational drive wheel (Fig. 3 spool 132) to drive bending of the steering section of the endoscope in a second plane ([0024]). Regarding Claim 13, Jungles discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 12 wherein the rotational drive wheel(s) (Figs. 1-2 control wheel 110, 130) are coupled to their respective rotatable control wheel(s) via a gearing arrangement (Fig. 3 gear 150). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hijihara in view of Appling et al. (US2021/0212553) hereinafter Appling. Regarding Claim 14, Hijihara discloses an imaging endoscopy system (Fig. 1), comprising: a hand controller (Fig. 1 endoscope 1) including a steering control mechanism (abstract) configured for controlling bending of a steering section (Fig. 1 bending portion 2b) of an endoscope (Fig. 1 endoscope 1) in a first plane (up and down plane [0034] “The bending portion 2 b is configured to bend in a vertical direction…”) via first and second steering wires (Fig. 9a wires 8D and 8U) the steering control mechanism (abstract – operation portion 5) comprising: a first rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) comprising first and second drive wheel body portions (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D and rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U), the first drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8D) comprising a first drum element (Figs. 79b hole 74) coupled to the first steering wire (Fig.9a wires 8D), and the second drive wheel body portion (Fig. 9a rotating adjusting member 70a connected to wire 8U)comprising a second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) coupled to the second steering wire (Fig. 9a wires 8U), wherein the rotational drive wheel (Fig. 9a pulley 60a) is configured to provide one-way relative rotation ([0113-0125]) of the first drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74) and the second drum element (Figs. 7-9b hole 74)); an umbilical section (Fig. 1 universal cable 4) an insertion section (Fig. 1 insertion portion 2) having a proximal end (Fig. 1 flexible tube portion 2c) connected to the hand controller (Fig. 1 endoscope 1 via grasping operation portion 3)) and a distal end (Fig. 1 distal end portion 2a and bending portion 2b) for insertion into a subject ([0031-0033]), the distal end (Fig. 1 distal end portion 2a and bending portion 2b) having a steering section (Fig. 1 bending portion 2b) and a distal tip (Fig. 1 distal end portion 2a), wherein bending of the steering section (Fig. 1 bending portion 2b) is controllable by user input ([0035-0039] user bending of lever 7) to the steering control mechanism (abstract – operation portion 5). Although Hijihara has a universal cord 4 in Fig. 1, Hijihara does not explicitly disclose what the universal cord 4 is connected to on the opposite end of the endoscope 1. Therefore, Hijihara is silent as to disclose wherein the system comprises a base unit and the umbilical section releasably connecting the base unit and the hand controller. However Appling, in the same field of endeavor, teaches a system comprises a base unit (Appling - Fig. 1 processing device 20) and the umbilical section (Appling - Fig.1 umbilical cable 18) releasably connecting the base unit (Appling - Fig. 1 processing device 20) and the hand controller (Appling – Fig. 1 handle 10). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Hijihara with the teachings of Appling to include the system comprises a base unit and the umbilical section releasably connecting the base unit and the hand controller for the benefit of “…receiving data obtained by devices as the distal tip” of an endoscope (Appling [ 0046] “An umbilical cable 18 extends from the housing 12 for being coupled with a processing device 20 for receiving data obtained by devices at the distal tip 16. The processing device 20 may include various types of electronics configured to display image data or perform various other analytical functions.”). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hijihara in view of Smith et al. (US5467779) hereinafter Smith Regarding Claim 7, Hijihara discloses the steering control mechanism according to claim 6 but is silent as to whether wherein the second drive wheel body portion comprises a plurality of pawls, each pawl being provided as part of a respective flexible arm of the second drive wheel body portion, said pawls equiangularly spaced around the second drive wheel body portion. However Smith, in the same field of endeavor, teaches wherein the second drive wheel body portion comprises a plurality of pawls, each pawl being provided as part of a respective flexible arm of the second drive wheel body portion (Smith – Fig. 2 array 2), said pawls (Smith – Fig. 2 pawls 26, 26’) equiangularly spaced around the second drive wheel body portion (Smith – abstract “The ratchet mechanism carries a pair of pawls, one of which engages the ring gear to cause clockwise rotation and the other of which engages the ring gear to cause counterclockwise rotation. The ratchet mechanism is displaced by actuators such as bimorphic devices, made of piezoelectric material, which bend in response to electrical pulsing.”). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Hijihara with the teachings of to include wherein the second drive wheel body portion comprises a plurality of pawls, each pawl being provided as part of a respective flexible arm of the second drive wheel body portion, said pawls equiangularly spaced around the second drive wheel body portion for the benefit of controlling the rotation of the wheel between clockwise and counter clockwise (Smith – abstract) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEGAN E MONAHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7330. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Carey can be reached at (571) 270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEGAN ELIZABETH MONAHAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 12, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593960
Endoscope provided with a device for closing a fluid flow circuit, for improved sterilisation
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588799
IMAGE DIAGNOSIS ASSISTANCE APPARATUS, ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM, IMAGE DIAGNOSIS ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND IMAGE DIAGNOSIS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582291
ENDOSCOPE AND ENDOSCOPE ILLUMINATION SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582299
ENDOSCOPE COMPRISING A BENDING SECTION HAVING INDIVIDUAL SEGMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12543932
WIRE-DRIVEN MANIPULATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+21.7%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month