Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/691,565

DATA CARRIER WITH SECURED SURFACE PERSONALIZATION ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 13, 2024
Priority
Sep 14, 2021 — EU 21306259.9 +1 more
Examiner
GRABOWSKI, KYLE ROBERT
Art Unit
3637
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Thales Group
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
660 granted / 1367 resolved
-3.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1421
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1367 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3, and 6-12, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims contain several redundant terms, which are previously recited in claim 15, from which they depend. Several terms lack proper antecedent basis from claim 15 and redundantly introduced. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 6-12, and 15, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Koda et al. (WO 2018/043749) referenced via English Translation (US 2021/0300106). In respect to claims 1, 3, and 15, Koda et al. disclose a data carrier comprising: a carrier body 10 comprising a top surface; at least one personalization element (e.g. laser engraving (0089)] 340 being arranged on the top surface of the carrier body 10; and at least one security element 330 at least partially arranged in/on the top surface of the personalization element 340 as an integral component, and at least partially within the carrier body 10 (0355-0356; Fig. 33). Koda et al. disclose the security element corresponds to a relief structure (Fig. 33) or may additionally comprise a marking element (e.g. in the carrier body) (0356). Koda et al. disclose that the data carrier has an extension axis (E) (y-axis) and the security element 330 extending continuously across a perpendicular transverse axis (T) (Fig. 37) (Wherein at least the element “4” extends continuously across the boundary of both features) the security element being an integral constituent of the personalization element 340 and the carrier body 10; the security element may be formed by electromagnetic radiation e.g. laser-engraving (0089). In respect to the amended subject matter, Koda et al. discloses 1) providing the carrier body 2) providing a personalization element on top of the carrier body and 3) generating a security element on and/in both the personalization element and the carrier body, in that order (0355-0356; Fig. 33). In respect to claims 6-8, Koda et al. disclose the ranges claimed (0128-0130). In respect to claim 9, Koda et al. disclose that the personalization element may comprise a layer 20 which may be carbonized (inferring a “reactive element”) by laser energy (0222-0223). In respect to claim 10, Koda et al. disclose that the carrier body 10 may comprise a plastic (0097). In respect to claim 11, Koda et al. disclose that the personalization element 340 of the particularly embodiment discussed above, which is generically identified as 20 (both are referred to as the “information display medium”) which can be a variety of shapes (images) (0087). In respect to claim 12, Koda et al. disclose that the security element 330 creates a visual contrast with both the carrier body and the personalization element 340 (Fig. 41). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 10/15/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that “[t]his sequencing of steps [the steps added to claim 15] is never disclosed by Koda”, which is not factual. Koda clearly discloses “an information display region [personalization element] 340 is formed in the substrate”, which provides explicit disclosure of first providing a substrate, and then providing the personalization element on the top of the substrate (Fig. 33), then generating a security element on and/in both the personalization element and the carrier body (0329; Fig. 33). Figure 33 (as well as Figure 34) clearly show a security element seamless provided between the carrier body and the personalization element. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KYLE ROBERT GRABOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-3518. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Troy, can be reached at 571-270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYLE R GRABOWSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jul 02, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Oct 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743971
FRAMING SYSTEM FOR FABRIC SIGNS
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740608
TOKEN HOUSING FOR FASHION ACCESSORIES
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733757
COLLECTABLE CAPSULE AND FRAME
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728662
Standardization of Taggant Signatures Using Transfer Images
4y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723852
SHOOTING RANGE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 9m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1367 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month