Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/691,915

TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, FUNCTION CONTROL APPARATUS SYSTEM, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
BROCK, PAUL MORGAN
Art Unit
2634
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-62.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
19
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.1%
+11.1% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Makoto (JP 2009/159319 A). Regarding Claim 1, Makoto teaches A transmission apparatus comprising: a scheme identification unit configured to identify at least one of a modulation scheme, a frame format, or an encoding scheme on a basis of a characteristic of a signal received ([0034-0036] (“The identification unit 702 identifies which modulation scheme…”); FIG. 7); a function control unit configured to perform control to cause a signal processing function to operate ([0034-0036] (“A distribution is obtained, and a modulation method corresponding to the cumulative distribution is specified…”)), the signal processing function depending on a result of identification of the at least one of the modulation scheme, the frame format, or the encoding scheme by the scheme identification unit; (Id.) and a signal processing unit configured to be controlled to operate by the function control unit and process the signal received. ([0034-0036] (“The modulation scheme to be performed may be specified”); [0034-0036, 0011-0012] (describing, in the first embodiment, a receiver that modulates the received signal based on the results of a processor 110, 111 — wherein the processor in the third embodiment is the identification unit 702); FIG. 7) Regarding Claim 2, Makoto teaches The transmission apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the function control unit is configured to activate a signal processing function depending on the result of identification and allocate a resource for the signal processing function to operate. ([0036] (“The modulation scheme to be performed may be specified”)) Regarding Claim 3, Makoto teaches The transmission apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the scheme identification unit is configured to identify a modulation scheme of the signal received on a basis of a frequency distribution of amplitudes of the signal received ([0034-0036] (“The identification unit 702 identifies which modulation scheme…”); FIG. 7), and the function control unit is configured to perform control to cause a demodulation function to operate, the demodulation function depending on the modulation scheme identified by the scheme identification unit. ([0034-0036] (“The identification unit 702 identifies which modulation scheme…”); FIG. 7). Regarding Claim 6¸ Makoto teaches A function control apparatus comprising: a function control unit that configured to receive, from a transmission apparatus, information on a result of identification of at least one of a modulation scheme, a frame format, or an encoding scheme identified on a basis of a characteristic of a signal received by the transmission apparatus ([0034-0036] (“The identification unit 702 identifies which modulation scheme…”); FIG. 7), and perform control to cause a signal processing function to operate in the transmission apparatus, the signal processing function depending on the result of identification received. ([0034-0036] (“A distribution is obtained, and a modulation method corresponding to the cumulative distribution is specified…”); FIG.7). Regarding Claim 7, Makoto teaches A system comprising a terminal apparatus and a transmission apparatus, wherein the terminal apparatus is configured to transmit a signal to the transmission apparatus ([0011-0012]; FIG.7), and the transmission apparatus includes: a scheme identification unit that configured to identify at least one of a modulation scheme, a frame format, or an encoding scheme on a basis of a characteristic of a signal received from the terminal apparatus ([0034-0036] (“The identification unit 702 identifies which modulation scheme…”)); a function control unit that configured to perform control to cause a signal processing function to operate ([0011-0012]; FIG.7), the signal processing function depending on a result of identification of the at least one of the modulation scheme, the frame format, or the encoding scheme by the scheme identification unit ([0034-0036] (“A distribution is obtained, and a modulation method corresponding to the cumulative distribution is specified…”); FIG.7); and a signal processing unit configured to be controlled to operate by the function control unit and process the signal received. ([0011-0012]; FIG.7). Regarding Claim 8, Makoto teaches A signal processing method, comprising: identifying at least one of a modulation scheme, a frame format, or an encoding scheme on a basis of a characteristic of a signal received ([0034-0036] (“The identification unit 702 identifies which modulation scheme…”); performing control to cause a signal processing function to operate, ([0011-0012]; FIG.7) the signal processing function depending on a result of identification of the at least one of the modulation scheme, the frame format, or the encoding scheme by the scheme identification unit ([0034-0036]); and performing control to cause the signal processing function to operate depending on the result of identification and process the signal received. ([0036] (“The modulation scheme to be performed may be specified”); [0034-0036, 0011-0012] (describing a receiver that modulates the received signal based on the results of a processor which in the third embodiment is the identification unit); FIG. 7) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Makoto (JP 2009/159319 A) in light of Geile (US Pat. App. Pub. 2007/0230325 A1) Regarding Claim 4, Makoto teaches The transmission apparatus according to claim 1, Makoto does not teach wherein the scheme identification unit is configured to identify a frame format of the signal received on a basis of a bit string pattern of a preamble included in the signal received, and the function control unit is configured to perform control to cause a frame detection function to operate, the frame detection function depending on the frame format identified by the scheme identification unit. Geile teaches wherein the scheme identification unit is configured to identify a frame format of the signal received on a basis of a bit string pattern of a preamble included in the signal received, and the function control unit is configured to perform control to cause a frame detection function to operate, the frame detection function depending on the frame format identified by the scheme identification unit. ([0215-0220]) Makoto and Geile are analogous art as both systems are concerned with demodulating received signals. Before the filing date of the instant application, it would have obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to look to Geile for demodulating a signal with a frame format and applying the demodulation technique used by the demodulator in Geile to the demodulator in Makoto. The suggestion/motivation would have been to enable the demodulator in Makoto to process frame format signals. Regarding Claim 5, the combination of Makoto and Geile teach The transmission apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the scheme identification unit is configured to perform processing of demodulation of a code included in a frame detected from the signal received (Geile, [0215-0220]), and identify an encoding scheme of the signal received on a basis of an amount of errors generated by the processing of demodulation (Geile, [0373]), and the function control unit is configured to perform control to cause a decoding function to operate, the decoding function depending on the encoding scheme identified by the scheme identification unit. (Makoto, [0036] (“The modulation scheme to be performed may be specified”); [0034, 0011-0012] (describing a receiver that modulates the received signal based on the results of a processor which in the third embodiment is the identification unit); FIG. 7) Before the filing date of the instant application, it would have obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to look to Geile for demodulating a signal based on the number of errors generated and applying the demodulation technique used by the demodulator in Geile to the demodulator in Makoto. The suggestion/motivation would have been to enable the demodulator in Makoto to demodulate based on the number of errors generated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL M BROCK whose telephone number is (571)272-7257. The examiner can normally be reached 8-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Vanderpuye can be reached at (571) 272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL MORGAN BROCK/Examiner, Art Unit 2634 January 28, 2026 /KENNETH N VANDERPUYE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month