Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/691,916

TERMINAL APPARATUS, BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
YUEN, KAN
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
738 granted / 833 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
860
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 833 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (Pub No.: 2022/0167445). Regarding claim 1, Wang et al. discloses a terminal apparatus (see terminal in para. 0118) that communicates with a base station apparatus (read as access network device in para. 0118), the terminal apparatus comprising: a processor (see processing unit 1101 in fig. 11) configured to perform communication using an MCG and an SCG (see fig. 3b, MN in communication with MCG and SN in communication with SCG; fig. 9, UE in communication with MN and SN); and a receiver (see transceiver unit 1102 in fig. 11), wherein the MCG includes at least a PCell (see para. 0101; when MCG includes only one cell, the cell is a primary cell (primary cell, PCell) of the terminal), the SCG includes at least a PSCell (see para. 0101; When the SCG includes only one cell, the cell is a primary secondary cell (primary secondary cell, PSCell) of the terminal), the receiver is configured to receive, from the base station apparatus, an RRC message indicating deactivation of the SCG and including information indicating whether to perform radio link monitoring on a PSCell of a deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see step 401 in fig. 4; step 902 in fig. 9; para. 0006, 0018, 0118, 0121, 0124, 0126-0130, 0144, 0229-0231; S401. A terminal receives a deactivation (deactivation) indication from an access network device, where the deactivation indication is used to indicate that a PSCell in an SCG is in a deactivated state. In para. 0126, the message/signaling may be physical layer signaling such as an RRC message. In para 0121, The deactivation indication in this application may also be referred to as a deactivation command (command) Deactivation may mean that the terminal temporarily stops transmitting data by using a communication link of the SCG). Thus, the terminal receives an RRC message indicating deactivation indication/command of the SCG and including information indicating whether to perform possible implementation operation(s) on the SCG such as stopping radio link failure detect; the processor is configured to deactivate the SCG in accordance with the RRC message indicating deactivation of the SCG (Wang et al. see step 402 in fig. 4; step 904 in fig. 9; para. 0008, 0121, 0127, 0237; In para. 0127, S402. The terminal performs a deactivation operation on the secondary cell group according to the deactivation indication). The terminal deactivates the SCG based on the deactivation indication by stopping transmitting data using the SCG, determine whether the information indicates performing radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0018, 0144; the performing a deactivation operation on the secondary cell group according to the deactivation indication includes: stopping radio link failure (radio link failure, RLF) detection on the primary secondary cell, or stopping channel state information-reference signal (channel state information-reference signal, CSI-RS)-based radio link monitoring (radio link monitoring, RLM).). Based on the received deactivation indication, the terminal determines whether to perform radio link monitoring, RLM, perform radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG in a deactivated state of the SCG in a case of determining that the information indicates performing radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0144; performs RLM based on a synchronization signal block (synchronization signal and PBCH block), to perform RLF determining). The terminal performs RLM based on SSB, to perform RLF determining, and not perform radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG in the deactivated state of the SCG in a case of determining that the information indicates not performing radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0144; Operation 6: Optionally, the terminal stops performing radio link failure (radio link failure, RLF) detection on the PSCell.). The terminal stops performing RLF detection on the PSCell, the receiver is configured to receive, from the base station apparatus, an RRC message indicating activation of the SCG (Wang et al. see step 601 in fig. 6; step 906 in fig. 9; para. 0156, 0160, 0240; S601. A terminal receives an activation (activation) indication from an access network device, where the activation indication indicates that a PSCell in an SCG is in an activated state. In para. 0160, The activation indication may be included in a MAC CE, an RRC message). The terminal receives an RRC message indicating activation of the SCG, and the processor is configured to activate the SCG in accordance with the RRC message indicating activation of the SCG (Wang et al. see step 602 in fig. 6; step 908 in fig. 9; para. 0158, 0159, 0243; S602. The terminal activates (activate) the secondary cell group according to the activation indication), and resume radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG in a case that radio link monitoring is not being performed (Wang et al. see para. 0032, 0159, 0172, 0173; The terminal restarts RLF detection on the PSCell.). The RLF detection on the PSCell is restarted based on the activation indication from deactivation state. Regarding claim 2, Wang et al. discloses a base station apparatus (read as access network device in para. 0118), that communicates with a terminal apparatus (see terminal in para. 0118), the base station apparatus comprising: a processor (see processor 1201 in fig. 12) configured to communicate with the terminal apparatus; and a transmitter (see transceiver 1205 in fig. 12), wherein an SCG configured for the terminal apparatus includes at least a PSCell (see para. 0101; When the SCG includes only one cell, the cell is a primary secondary cell (primary secondary cell, PSCell) of the terminal), the transmitter is configured to cause the terminal apparatus to deactivate the SCG by transmitting, to the terminal apparatus, an RRC message indicating deactivation of the SCG and including information indicating whether to perform radio link monitoring on a PSCell of a deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see step 401 in fig. 4; step 902 in fig. 9; para. 0006, 0018, 0118, 0121, 0124, 0126-0130, 0144, 0229-0231; S401. A terminal receives a deactivation (deactivation) indication from an access network device, where the deactivation indication is used to indicate that a PSCell in an SCG is in a deactivated state. In para. 0126, the message/signaling may be physical layer signaling such as an RRC message. In para 0121, The deactivation indication in this application may also be referred to as a deactivation command (command) Deactivation may mean that the terminal temporarily stops transmitting data by using a communication link of the SCG). Thus, the access network device transmits, to the terminal, an RRC message indicating deactivation indication/command of the SCG and including information indicating whether to perform possible implementation operation(s) on the SCG such as stopping radio link failure detect, the base station apparatus is configured to, through the information indicating that radio link monitoring is not performed on the PSCell of the deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0124, 0144; The network side may provide the configuration of the PSCell for the UE by using a radio resource control (radio resource control, RRC) message.). Thus, the access network device provides configuration of the PSCell for the UE for performing deactivation operation(s) such as operation 6: …the terminal stops performing radio link failure (radio link failure, RLF) detection on the PSCell, cause the terminal apparatus to determine not to perform radio link monitoring on the PSCell in a deactivated state of the SCG, and cause the terminal apparatus not to perform radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG in the deactivated state of the SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0144; Operation 6: Optionally, the terminal stops performing radio link failure (radio link failure, RLF) detection on the PSCell.). The terminal determines and stops performing RLF detection on the PSCell based on the deactivation indication/command, the base station apparatus is configured to, through the information indicating that radio link monitoring is performed on the PSCell of the deactivated SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0124, 0144; The network side may provide the configuration of the PSCell for the UE by using a radio resource control (radio resource control, RRC) message.). Thus, the access network device provides configuration of the PSCell for the UE for performing deactivation operation(s) such as operation 6: …performs RLM based on a synchronization signal block (synchronization signal and PBCH block), to perform RLF determining, cause the terminal apparatus to determine to perform radio link monitoring on the PSCell in the deactivated state of the SCG, and cause the terminal apparatus to perform radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG in the deactivated state of the SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0144; performs RLM based on a synchronization signal block (synchronization signal and PBCH block), to perform RLF determining). The terminal determines and performs RLM based on SSB, to perform RLF determining based on the deactivation indication/command, and the base station apparatus causes the terminal apparatus to activate the SCG by transmitting an RRC message indicating activation of the SCG to the terminal apparatus (Wang et al. see step 601 in fig. 6; step 906 in fig. 9; para. 0156, 0158, 0160, 0240; The SN sends an activation indication to the UE. In para. 0160, The activation indication may be included in a MAC CE, an RRC message). The access network device transmits an RRC message indicating activation of the SCG, and the base station apparatus causes the terminal apparatus to initiate (resume) radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG in a case that the terminal apparatus is not performing radio link monitoring on the PSCell of the SCG (Wang et al. see para. 0032, 0159, 0172, 0173; The terminal restarts RLF detection on the PSCell.). The RLF detection on the PSCell is restarted based on the activation indication from deactivation state. Claim 3 is rejected similarly to claim 2. Examiner's Note The Applicant is welcome to request a telephonic interview if the Applicant has any questions or requires any additional information that would further or expedite the prosecution of the application. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Liu et al. (Pub No.: 2023/0189383) discloses methods, systems, and devices related to digital wireless communication, and more specifically, to techniques related to wireless cell activation and deactivation. In one exemplary aspect, a method for data communication is disclosed. The method includes receiving, by a terminal, a first message from a network node, the first message including information for a first action to be performed relating to a secondary group of cells. The method also includes performing, by the terminal, the first action relating to the secondary group of cells in a deactivated state responsive to the receiving of the first message from the network node. Min (Pub No.: 2024/0214842) discloses a terminal deactivates a secondary cell group according to a state of the secondary cell group. The terminal also transmits failure information of the secondary cell group to a network. When a failure of the secondary cell group in an inactive state occurs, the terminal transmits failure information including an information element indicating a state of cells of the secondary cell group. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAN YUEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1413. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:30am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAN YUEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604235
WIRELESS NETWORK LOAD BALANCING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592765
Software-Defined Filtering in a Repeater
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593246
PREDICTIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED WIRELESS STATION LOAD BALANCING BASED ON ACCESS POINT UPLINK UTILIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587907
Handover method and apparatus, and information transmitting method and apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587927
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONDITIONAL RECONFIGURATION IN INTEGRATED ACCESS AND BACKHAUL (IAB)
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.0%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 833 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month