Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/691,973

Split Ring Pliers

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
SHAKERI, HADI
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Toit Fishing Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
1119 granted / 1808 resolved
-8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
1875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1808 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mouzakis, III (9,808,052 “Mouzakis”) in view of Bogart et al. (4,896,661 “Bogart”). PNG media_image1.png 231 450 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 326 336 media_image2.png Greyscale Mouzakis meets all of the limitations of claim 1, i.e., an apparatus for opening a split ring, comprising: a pair of levers 16/13, 17/11 pivotally coupled together @15 to define opposed first and second jaws 11, 13 and corresponding handles 16, 17 for opening and closing the first and second jaws; and a member e.g., 37 mounted on the first jaw, the member having a wedge-shaped profile Fig. 13, tapering from a base region @12 adjacent the first jaw to a tip region @73 spaced from the base region, with the tip region being configured for insertion between adjacent helical turns of a split ring Fig. 11 when gripped between the first and second jaws, except for the tip region to have an arcuate peripheral edge which extends from at least one lateral side of the first jaw to the other, and wherein the arcuate peripheral edge of the tip region extends at least partially around a longitudinal axis extending along one lever from the first jaw towards the corresponding handle. PNG media_image5.png 176 532 media_image5.png Greyscale Bogart teaches a ratcheting forceps with interchangeable tips, including a tip region 710 having an arcuate peripheral edge base of 710 that extends a lateral side to the other surrounding the longitudinal axis along one lever from the first jaw towards the corresponding lever Fig. 1, partially shown here or Fig. 2. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective date of the invention, to modify the invention of Mouzakis with the interchangeable tips configured with arcuate peripheral edge as taught by Bogart for a adapting to different tasks and also for providing an engaging edge that wraps around the jaw for ease of access of the workpiece from different angles and directions. Regarding claims 2 and 3, PA (prior art, Mouzakis modified by Bogart) meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the arcuate peripheral edge of the tip region extends at least 180⁰ (claim 2) or 360˚ around the longitudinal axis Figs. 1, 2 Bogart. PNG media_image6.png 194 187 media_image6.png Greyscale [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (MODIFIED ANNULAR SIDE 12 OF MOUZAKIS)][AltContent: connector] Regarding claim 4, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the member has a first surface side 12, modified by annular wrap-around tip of Bogart extending from the tip region to the base region which faces towards a pivot axis of the pair of levers similar to Fig. 1 of Bogart partially shown here. PNG media_image8.png 283 232 media_image8.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (2ND SFC)][AltContent: arrow]Regarding claim 8, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 4,wherein the member has a second surface opposite 12, annotated partial Fig. 13, above extending from the tip region to the base region which faces away from the pivot axis of the pair of levers. Regarding claims 5 and 9, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 4 or claim 8, wherein the first surface is curved around the longitudinal axis modified annular tip. Regarding claims 6 and 10, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 5 or claim 9, wherein the first surface modified 12 is at least in part substantially frustoconical wedge tip 73, Fig. 13, Mouzakis. Regarding claims 7 and 11, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 5 or claim 9, wherein the first surface is concave or convex. PNG media_image10.png 389 293 media_image10.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 1, wherein at least one jaw comprises a distal part grooved end portion releasably coupled to a proximal part, with the distal and proximal parts extending along the longitudinal axis Fig. 10, Bogart. Regarding claim 13, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to claim 12, wherein one part comprises a socket 48, 58, and the other part comprises a shaft 300 which is received in the socket Figs. 2, 4 and 10 Bogart. PNG media_image11.png 284 333 media_image11.png Greyscale Regarding claim 15, PA meets the limitations, i.e., the apparatus according to any one of claim 12, wherein the at least one jaw is the first jaw modified jaw 11 of Mouzakis modified for annular base connection by Bogart, and the distal part comprises the member having the wedge-shaped profile 73 of Mouzakis modified by Bogart for an annular base. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PA as applied to claim 13 above, and further in view of Swanstrom, Jr. (6,386,076). PA (prior art, Mouzakis modified by Bogart) as applied to claim 1 above, meets all of the limitations of claim 14, as applied to claim 13 above, except for the socket and the shaft to comprise inter-engaging screw threads for releasably coupling the distal part to the proximal part. PNG media_image12.png 232 287 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 259 324 media_image13.png Greyscale Swanstrom, Jr. teaches a plier with separatable jaws utilizing either a press fit connection Fig. 15 as in PA applied or inter-engaging threads Fig. 11, 03:15-19. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective date of the invention, to further modify the modified invention of PA with interengaing threads as taught by Swanstrom, Jr. for a quick and an alternative means of readily coupling the jaws. Conclusion PNG media_image16.png 209 184 media_image16.png Greyscale PNG media_image17.png 200 208 media_image17.png Greyscale PNG media_image18.png 209 331 media_image18.png Greyscale PNG media_image19.png 165 174 media_image19.png Greyscale Prior art made of record and not relied upon at this time, are considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Garvey, quick disconnect, Jerdee annular base, Jenkins double wedge tips and Mack annular tips are cited to show related inventions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HADI SHAKERI whose telephone number is (571)272-4495. The fax phone number for forwarding unofficial documents for discussion purposes only is (571) 273-4495. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Keller can be reached on 571 272 8548. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Hadi Shakeri/ March 4, 2026 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600017
SPOUT SEPARATING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594659
FLUID-POWERED TORQUE WRENCH WITH FLUID PUMP CONTROLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594795
TYRE SUPPORT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12564918
TOOL BIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552009
Tool
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1808 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month