Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/692,183

ICON MOVING METHOD, RELATED GRAPHICAL INTERFACE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — CN 202111161063.1 +1 more
Examiner
MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA
Art Unit
2174
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allowance Rate
77 granted / 258 resolved
-25.2% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
291
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
93.1%
+53.1% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 258 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION This communication is responsive to Pre-Amendment filed 03/14/2024. Claims 35-54 are pending in this application. In the Pre-Amendment, claims 1-34 are cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 35-44 and 46-54 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 35, 37, 39, 44, 46, 48, and 54 recite the limitation "the first interface” in lines 4, 7, 4, 3, 11, 7, and 6 respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 35-54 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kang et al. (“Kang”, US 2012/0166987). As per claim 35, Kang teaches a method for icon moving, the method comprising: displaying, by an electronic device, a first number of application icons, wherein the first number of application icons comprise a first application icon, and the first application icon is arranged at a first location on the first interface (Kang, Fig.2A/3A, icon 220/320 displayed in first page 211/311; para.43, 52); detecting, by the electronic device, a first user operation, the first user operation comprising selecting the first application icon (Kang, Fig.2A/3A, icon 220/320 selected by touch and hold for more than critical time; para.43, 52); displaying, by the electronic device, a second number of application icons in response to the first user operation, wherein the second number is greater than the first number (Kang, Fig.2B, para.44-46, selecting icon and moving to edge displays add’l icon pages; Fig.2C-D/3B-C, scaled-down pages 211-213/311-312 displaying add’l icons with first number of icons; para.46, 53); detecting, by the electronic device, a second user operation of releasing the first application icon (Kang, Fig.2E/3D, touch release; para.47, 55); and changing, by the electronic device, an arrangement of the first application icon to a second location, wherein the second location is a location at which the first application icon is released (Kang, Fig.2D-E/3D, icon 220-320 dragged to second page 212/312; para.47-48, 55). As per claim 36, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, wherein the first user operation comprises: selecting the first application icon without release; or selecting and moving the first application icon (Kang, Fig.2B, para.44-46, selecting icon and moving to edge displays add’l icon pages; Fig.2A/3A, icon 220/320 selected by touch and hold for more than critical time; para.43, 52). As per claim 37, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, wherein the first user operation comprises an operation of selecting the first application icon without release (Kang, Fig.2B, para.44-46, selecting icon and moving to edge displays add’l icon pages; Fig.2A/3A, icon 220/320 selected by touch and hold for more than critical time; para.43, 52); and the method further comprises: detecting, by the electronic device, a drag operation; and moving, by the electronic device, the first application icon on the first interface based on the drag operation (Kang, Fig.2D-E/3D, icon 220-320 dragged to second page 212/312; para.47-48, 55). As per claim 38, Kang teaches the method according to claim 36, wherein the displaying, by the electronic device, a second number of application icons comprises: when detecting that the first application icon is selected without release, displaying, by the electronic device, the second number of application icons (Kang, Fig.2B, para.44-46, selecting icon and moving to edge displays add’l icon pages; Fig.2C-D/3B-C, scaled-down pages 211-213/311-312 displaying add’l icons with first number of icons; para.46, 53). As per claim 39, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, comprising: when moving the first application icon, changing, by the electronic device, an arrangement of the first application icon on the first interface (Kang, Fig.2D-E/3D, icon 220-320 dragged from first page to second page 212/312; para.47-48, 55). As per claim 40, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, wherein a size of an application icon in the first number of application icons is a first size, a size of an application icon in the second number of application icons is a second size, and the second size is less than the first size (Kang, Fig.2C-D/3B-C, scaled-down icons in pages 211-213/311-312 have smaller size than first size; para.46, 53). As per claim 41, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, wherein the second number of application icons comprise the first number of application icons (Kang, Fig.2C-D/3B-C, scaled-down pages 211-213/311-312 displaying add’l icons with first number of icons; para.46, 53). As per claim 42, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, comprising: when detecting that the first application icon is selected: scaling up, by the electronic device, the first application icon for display; or scaling down, by the electronic device, the first application icon for display; or marking, by the electronic device, the first application icon as a selected state (Kang, Fig.2A-E/3A-D, selected icon marked in a selected state). As per claim 43, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, comprising: when the first application icon stops moving or a movement speed of the first application icon is less than a second speed, scaling up an application icon for display at a location of the first application icon (Kang, Fig.2E/3D, second page 212/312 displayed full screen; para.48, 55). As per claim 44, Kang teaches the method according to claim 35, wherein after the changing, by the electronic device, an arrangement of the first application icon to a second location on the first interface, the method further comprises: displaying, by the electronic device, the first application icon arranged at the second location on the first interface (Kang, Fig.2D-E/3D, icon 220-320 dragged from first page to second page 212/312; para.47-48, 55). As per claim 45, Kang teaches a method for icon moving, the method comprising: displaying, by an electronic device, a first page, wherein a first application icon is displayed at a first location on the first page, application icons of the electronic device are arranged on K pages, and the K pages comprise the first page (Kang, Fig.2A, 3A, icon 220/320 displayed in first page 211/311; para.43, 52); detecting, by the electronic device, a first user operation, the first user operation comprising selecting the first application icon (Kang, Fig.2A/3A, icon 220/320 selected by touch and hold for more than critical time; para.43, 52); displaying, by the electronic device, an interface of L scaled-down pages, wherein L is less than K (Kang, Fig.2C-D/3B-C, scaled-down pages 211-213/311-312; para.46, 53); detecting, by the electronic device, a movement operation of moving the first application icon to a scaled-down page of the L scaled-down pages (Kang, Fig.2D/3C, icon 220/320 dragged to second page 212/312; para.47, 53-54); scaling up, as a second page and by the electronic device, the scaled-down page for display (Kang, Fig.2E/3D, second page 212/312 displayed full screen; para.48, 55); detecting, by the electronic device, a second user operation of releasing the first application icon on the second page (Kang, Fig.2E/3D, touch release; para.47, 55); and changing, by the electronic device, an arrangement of the first application icon to a second location on the second page, wherein the second location is a location, on the second page, at which the first application icon is released (Kang, Fig.2D-E/3D, icon 220-320 dragged to second page 212/312; para.47-48, 55). Claim 46 is similar in scope to claim 35, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 47 is similar in scope to claim 36, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 48 is similar in scope to claim 37, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 49 is similar in scope to claim 38, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 50 is similar in scope to claim 40, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 51 is similar in scope to claim 41, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 52 is similar in scope to claim 42, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 53 is similar in scope to claim 43, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claim 54 is similar in scope to claim 44, and is therefore rejected under similar rationale. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Xiangli et al. (US 2016/0349963) teaches a method of icon moving between pages. Turk (US 2020/0249823) teaches a method of scaling down page for reordering icons. Wu et al. (US 2023/0176717) teaches a method of moving icons on a watch face. Kim et al. (US 2012/0304084) teaches a method of arranging icons between pages. Lee et al. (US 2016/0320756) teaches a method of scaling down icons to fit in watch face. Han et al. (US 2015/0355823) teaches a method of moving icons to a second page. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAJEDA MUHEBBULLAH whose telephone number is (571)272-4065. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tue/Thur-Fri 10am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William L Bashore can be reached at 571-272-4088. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.M./ Sajeda MuhebbullahExaminer, Art Unit 2174 /WILLIAM L BASHORE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2174
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
May 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12510876
MACHINE STATE VISUALIZATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12271745
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECONCILING USER INTERACTIONS
6y 10m to grant Granted Apr 08, 2025
Patent 12260841
MULTIPLE PRIMARY USER INTERFACES
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 25, 2025
Patent 12248673
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ATTRIBUTING A SCROLL EVENT IN AN INFINITE SCROLL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
5y 0m to grant Granted Mar 11, 2025
Patent 12001661
Bound Based Contextual Zoom
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 04, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+34.9%)
4y 9m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 258 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month