Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/692,205

Optical Transmission System, Optical Transmission Method, Transmitter, and Receiver

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
WOLDEKIDAN, HIBRET ASNAKE
Art Unit
2635
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
719 granted / 837 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 837 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Applicant is advised that should claim 15 be found allowable, claim16 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1,4-6,9,15,16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yu et al.(US 2017/0180055) in view of Dzung(EP 3203695). Considering claim 1 Yu discloses an optical transmission system comprising: N directly-modulated lasers configured to convert N-channel first electrical modulated signals into N-channel optical modulated signals and transmit the N-channel optical modulated signals(See Paragraph 249, 250,fig. 55 i.e. N directly-modulated lasers(RGB LEDs) configured to convert N-channel first electrical modulated signals(CH1, CH2,…) into N-channel optical modulated signals and transmit the N-channel optical modulated signals to the receiver side); N photodetectors configured to receive the N-channel optical modulated signals and convert the N-channel optical modulated signals into N-channel second electrical modulated signals(See Paragraph 256,121,fig. 55 i.e. N photodetectors(APD) configured to receive the N-channel optical modulated signals and convert the N-channel optical modulated signals into N-channel second electrical modulated signals); and at least one of a first MIMO equalizer configured to execute equalization processing for the N-channel first electrical modulated signals, thereby compensating for crosstalk between the N-channel first electrical modulated signals(See Paragraph 181,249, 250,fig. 55 i.e. at least one of a first MIMO equalizer which is a pre-FDE(frequency domain Equalization) configured to execute equalization processing for the N-channel first electrical modulated signals received from the FFT, thereby compensating for crosstalk between the N-channel first electrical modulated signals), and a second MIMO equalizer configured to execute equalization processing for the N-channel second electrical modulated signals, thereby compensating for crosstalk between the N-channel second electrical modulated signals(See Paragraph 181,246,249,fig. 55 i.e. a second MIMO equalizer which is a post-FDE(frequency domain Equalization) configured to execute equalization processing for the N-channel second electrical modulated signals, thereby compensating for crosstalk between the N-channel second electrical modulated signals). Yu does not explicitly disclose wherein a matrix coefficient based on an impulse response is used in the equalization processing. Dzung teaches wherein a matrix coefficient based on an impulse response is used in the equalization processing(See Abstract, Paragraph 7,8 i.e. wherein a matrix coefficient(w(i)) based on an impulse response(c(t)) is used in the equalization processing). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Yu, and have a matrix coefficient based on an impulse response to be used in the equalization processing, as taught by Dzung, thus improving transmission signal quality by reducing signal distortion using a matrix coefficient based on an impulse response in equalization process, as discussed by Dzung (Abstract). Considering Claim 4 Yu and Dzung disclose the optical transmission system according to claim 1, comprising: a transmitter sequentially comprising N RF drivers configured to drive the N directly-modulated lasers, and the N directly-modulated lasers(See Yu: Paragraph 151,212,249,fig. 55 i.e. a transmitter sequentially comprising N RF drivers(CH1,CH2,LPFs,EAs, DC Bias) configured to drive the N directly-modulated lasers(RGB LEDs), and the N directly-modulated lasers(RGB LEDs)); a receiver sequentially comprising the N photodetectors, N AD converters, and the MIMO equalizer(See Yu: Paragraph 151,212,249,fig. 55 i.e. a receiver sequentially comprising the N photodetectors(avalanche photodiodes(APD)), N AD converters(ADC), and the MIMO equalizer(PRE-FDA,POST-FDA)); and a communication channel configured to connect the transmitter and the receiver(See Yu: Paragraph 250,fig. 55 i.e. a communication channel(free space, lens, RGB filter) configured to connect the transmitter and the receiver). Considering Claim 5 Yu and Dzung disclose the optical transmission system according to claim 1, comprising: a transmitter sequentially comprising the MIMO equalizer, N DA converters, N RF drivers configured to drive the N directly-modulated lasers, and the N directly-modulated lasers(See Yu: Paragraph 151,212,249,fig. 55 i.e. a transmitter sequentially comprising the MIMO equalizer(PRE-FDE), N DA converters(DACs), N RF drivers(CH1,CH2,LPFs,EAs, DC Bias) configured to drive the N directly-modulated lasers(RGB LEDs), and the N directly-modulated lasers(RGB LEDs); a receiver comprising the N photodetectors(See Yu: Paragraph 151,212,249,fig. 55 i.e. a receiver comprising the N photodetectors(avalanche photodiodes(APD)); and a communication channel configured to connect the transmitter and the receiver(See Yu: Paragraph 250,fig. 55 i.e. a communication channel(free space, lens, RGB filter) configured to connect the transmitter and the receiver). Considering Claim 6 Yu and Dzung disclose the optical transmission system according to claim 4, wherein at least one of the transmitter and the receiver is mounted on a PIC(See Yu: Paragraph 171,154,249,fig. 32,55 i.e. wherein at least one of the transmitter and the receiver is inherently mounted on a PIC which is a visible light communication(VLC) system of fig. 32,55). Claim 9 is rejected for the same reason as stated in claims 1,5 Claim 15 is rejected for the same reason as in claim 6. Claim 16 is rejected for the same reason as in claim 6. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is allowed. Claims 2,3,11-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HIBRET A WOLDEKIDAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5145. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID C PAYNE can be reached at (571)272-3024. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HIBRET A WOLDEKIDAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603702
OPTICAL AMPLIFIER GAIN SELF-PROVISIONING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603720
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COUPLING OPTICAL NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598405
OPTICAL TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION SYSTEM AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592780
OPTICAL RECEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587282
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAINTAINING WAVELENGTH INTERVAL OF LIGHT SOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 837 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month