Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/692,316

UU-RTT OR SL-RTT MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING OPTIMIZATION

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
PATEL, CHANDRAHAS B
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
780 granted / 885 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
918
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 885 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 30 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because a computer readable medium typically covers forms of non-transitory tangible media and transitory propagating signals per se, particularly when the specification is silent. When the broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim covers a signal per se, the claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as covering non-statutory subject matter. It is suggested that the claims be amended to narrow the claim to cover only statutory embodiments to avoid a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 by adding the limitation “non-transitory” to the claim. Such an amendment would typically not raise the issue of new matter, even when the specification is silent because the broadest reasonable interpretation relies on the ordinary and customary meaning that includes signals per se. The specification defines a “computer readable medium” as “a random-access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage, other magnetic storage devices, combinations of the types of computer-readable media, or any other medium that can be used to store computer executable code in the form of instructions or data structures that can be accessed by a computer”, which are only examples of computer readable media and is therefore non-limiting. In the broadest reasonable interpretation of the claim, there is a possibility that the computer readable medium can include a transitory signal, which is non-statutory subject matter. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 9, 18-20, 29 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huawei, HiSilicon, “Discussion on remaining issues for UE Rx-Tx time difference measurement requirements”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting #98-bis-e, R4-2107001. Regarding claim 1, R4-2107001 teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: a memory; at least one transceiver; and at least one processor, communicatively connected to the memory and the at least one transceiver, the at least one processor configured to: determine a reception (RX) reference signals (RS) (RX-RS) - transmission (TX) reference signals (RS) (TX-RS) proximity parameter defining a proximity window around the RX-RS resource for receiving the RX-RS [Section 2.1 and 2.2, proximity between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined]; identify a TX-RS resource of at least one TX-RS resource for transmitting TX-RS within the proximity window around a RX-RS resource for receiving RX-RS, an identified TX-RS resource being used by the UE for determining a UE RX-TX time difference associated with a time difference between reception of the RX-RS and transmission of the TX-RS [Section 2.2, resource which is period for transmission is determined based on difference between RX-RS and TX-RS]; and measure the UE RX-TX time difference based on received RX-RS in the RX-RS resource and transmitted TX-RS in the identified TX-RS resource when TX-RS is transmitted in the identified TX-RS resource [Section 2.2, difference between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined based on TX-RS transmission ad RX-RS reception]. Regarding claims 2 and 19, R4-2107001 teaches the UE RX-TX time difference is measured based on the identified TX-RS resource corresponding to the proximity window [Section 2.2]. Regarding claims 3 and 20, R4-2107001 teaches receiving a configuration comprising the RX-RS-TX-RS proximity parameter [Section 2.2]. Regarding claim 9, R4-2107001 teaches one TX-RS resource, and wherein the one TX-RS resource is identified for determining the UE RX-TX time difference [Section 2.2]. Regarding claim 18, R4-2107001 teaches a method of wireless communication of a user equipment (UE), comprising: determining a reception (RX) reference signals (RS) (RX-RS) - transmission (TX) reference signals (RS) (TX-RS) proximity parameter defining a proximity window around the RX-RS resource for receiving the RX-RS [Section 2.1 and 2.2, proximity between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined]; identifying a TX-RS resource of at least one TX-RS resource for transmitting TX-RS within the proximity window around a RX-RS resource for receiving RX-RS, an identified TX-RS resource being used by the UE for determining a UE RX-TX time difference associated with a time difference between reception of the RX-RS and transmission of the TX-RS [Section 2.2, resource which is period for transmission is determined based on difference between RX-RS and TX-RS]; and measuring the UE RX-TX time difference based on received RX-RS in the RX-RS resource and transmitted TX-RS in the identified TX-RS resource when TX-RS is transmitted in the identified TX-RS resource [Section 2.2, difference between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined based on TX-RS transmission ad RX-RS reception]. Regarding claim 29 R4-2107001 teaches and apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: means for determining a reception (RX) reference signals (RS) (RX-RS) - transmission (TX) reference signals (RS) (TX-RS) proximity parameter defining a proximity window around the RX-RS resource for receiving the RX-RS [Section 2.1 and 2.2, proximity between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined]; means for identifying a TX-RS resource of at least one TX-RS resource for transmitting TX-RS within the proximity window around a RX-RS resource for receiving RX-RS, an identified TX-RS resource being used by the UE for determining a UE RX-TX time difference associated with a time difference between reception of the RX-RS and transmission of the TX-RS [Section 2.2, resource which is period for transmission is determined based on difference between RX-RS and TX-RS]; and means for measuring the UE RX-TX time difference based on received RX-RS in the RX-RS resource and transmitted TX-RS in the identified TX-RS resource when TX-RS is transmitted in the identified TX-RS resource [Section 2.2, difference between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined based on TX-RS transmission ad RX-RS reception]. Regarding claim 30, R4-2107001 teaches a computer-readable medium storing computer executable code at a user equipment (UE), the code when executed by a processor causes the processor to: determine a reception (RX) reference signals (RS) (RX-RS) - transmission (TX) reference signals (RS) (TX-RS) proximity parameter defining a proximity window around the RX-RS resource for receiving the RX-RS [Section 2.1 and 2.2, proximity between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined]; identify a TX-RS resource of at least one TX-RS resource for transmitting TX-RS within the proximity window around a RX-RS resource for receiving RX-RS, an identified TX-RS resource being used by the UE for determining a UE RX-TX time difference associated with a time difference between reception of the RX-RS and transmission of the TX-RS [Section 2.2, resource which is period for transmission is determined based on difference between RX-RS and TX-RS]; and measure the UE RX-TX time difference based on received RX-RS in the RX-RS resource and transmitted TX-RS in the identified TX-RS resource when TX-RS is transmitted in the identified TX-RS resource [Section 2.2, difference between RX-RS and TX-RS is determined based on TX-RS transmission ad RX-RS reception]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-8, 10-17 and 21-28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is cited on the form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHANDRAHAS PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1211. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30 - 17:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 571-272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Chandrahas B Patel/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598054
IN-VEHICLE DEVICE, TIME SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD, AND TIME SYNCHRONIZATION PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598041
METHOD AND DEVICE IN A NODE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593317
BIT SELECTION FOR MULTI-SLOT UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL TRANSMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593201
COMMUNICATION METHOD, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR UPDATING USER EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581471
METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING MULTI-RADIO ACCESS TECHNOLOGY CARRIER AGGREGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 885 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month