Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/692,337

IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Priority
Oct 05, 2021 — JP 2021-164271 +1 more
Examiner
CHIN, RICKY
Art Unit
2424
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
383 granted / 562 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
580
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 562 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments 1. Applicant’s arguments filed 6-23-26 have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant amends the claims to recite that the selected subpictures are selected using identification information identifying at least one subpicture indicated in the request and argues that the prior art of record does not teach of the newly added limitations. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. Di, [0212]-[0219] and [0231] teaches of ROI information carried in the request of the client. Moreover, it is disclosed that the ROI information includes x information, y information, width, and height to identify and select the subpictures/ROIs based on the information in the request, thus reading on the newly amended limitations. For the reasons stated above and detailed below in the claim rejections, the rejections are maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 3. Claims 20-27, 29, and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Di et al., US 2019/0238933. Regarding claim 20, Di teaches of an image processing method comprising: generating a bitstream of a partial region constituted by selected subpictures among the subpictures included in a picture based on a request from a second apparatus (See [0165]-[0179] request from client for region of interest; Di, Fig.4 and [0161] which discloses of multiple client devices); and transmitting the bitstream of the partial region to the second apparatus (See [0165]-[0179]; Di, Fig.4 and [0161] which discloses of multiple client devices), wherein the selected subpictures are selected using identification information identifying at least one subpicture indicated in the request (See [0212]-[0219] and [0231]). Regarding claim 21, Di teaches of an image processing apparatus comprising: circuitry configured to generate based on data of content, partial region file generation information for generating a file for storing a bitstream of a partial region including selected subpictures of a picture; and generate a control file for controlling distribution of a content file to store the partial region file generation information (See [0010]-[0013]; [0019]-[0025], and [0165]-[0179] which discloses the file of the mpd, xml, dash which stores and generates the spatial regions and region of interest region used for sending the desired regions to the client based on the request), wherein the selected subpictures are selected using identification information identifying at least one subpicture indicated in the request (See [0212]-[0219] and [0231]). Regarding claim 22, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 21, wherein the circuitry is further configured to generate partial region information indicating a position of a subpicture constituting the partial region in the picture, and store the partial region information in the control file (See [0010]-[0013]; [0019]-[0025], and [0165]-[0179] which discloses of the position/coordinates of the regions). Regarding claim 23, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the circuitry is configured to store pieces of the partial region information of candidates for the partial region in mutually different adaptation sets of the control file (See [0019]-[0025] which discloses of the partial regions in different adaption sets within the mpd/xml file). Regarding claim 24, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the partial region information further includes information indicating a position of the subpicture in the partial region (See [0010]-[0013]; [0019]-[0025], and [0165]-[0179] which discloses of the position/coordinates of the regions). Regarding claim 25, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the partial region information further includes information indicating a size of the subpicture (See [0068], [0179], and [0200]-[0201] size information). Regarding claim 26, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the circuitry is further configured to store pieces of the partial region information of candidates for the partial region in one adaptation set of the control file (See [0019]-[0025] which discloses of the partial regions in different adaption sets within the mpd/xml file). Regarding claim 27, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the partial region information further includes link information with respect to information indicating a position of the subpicture in the partial region (See [0020]-[0025] uri/url for information of at least the spatial position). Regarding claim 29, Di teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the partial region information further includes link information with respect to the partial region information (See [0020]-[0025] uri/url for information of the regions). Regarding claim 31, Di teaches an image processing method comprising: generating partial region file generation information for generating a file for storing a bitstream of a partial region including selected subpictures of a picture based on data of content; and generating a control file for controlling distribution of a content file to store the partial region file generation information (See analysis of claims 20-22; [0010]-[0013]; [0019]-[0025], and [0165]-[0179]), wherein the selected subpictures are selected using identification information identifying at least one subpicture indicated in the request (See [0212]-[0219] and [0231]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 5. Claims 1-19 and 32-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Di et al., US 2019/0238933 in view of Ramaswamy et al., WO 2018/152437. Regarding claim 1, Di teaches of an image processing system comprising a server including first circuitry and a client apparatus including second circuitry (See Fig.4, client and server), wherein the second circuitry of the client apparatus is configured to request the server for a bitstream of a partial region of a picture (See [0165]-[0178] client sends request to server for the bitstream of the region of interest) based on partial region file generation information included in a control file for controlling distribution of a content file to generate a file for storing the bitstream of the partial region (See [0010]-[0013] and [0019]-[0025] which discloses the file of the mpd, xml, dash which stores and generates the spatial regions and region of interest region used for sending the desired regions to the client based on the request), wherein the first circuitry of the server is configured to generate the bitstream of the partial region constituted by selected subpictures among a plurality subpictures included in the picture based on the request by the client apparatus (See [0165]-[0179] the server generates and multiplexes the bitstream of the selected region of interests and transmits to the client based on the client request), and transmit the bitstream of the partial region to the client apparatus, and wherein the second circuitry of the client apparatus is further configured to receive the bitstream of the partial region transmitted from the server (See [0165]-[0179] the server generates and multiplexes the bitstream of the selected region of interests and transmits to the client based on the client request wherein the client receives the bitstream), and wherein the selected subpictures are selected using identification information identifying at least one subpicture indicated in the request (See [0212]-[0219] and [0231]). Di is silent with respect to wherein the client segments a segmented region from the bitstream of the partial region. However, in the same field of endeavor, Ramaswamy teaches of wherein the client segments a segmented region from the bitstream of the partial region (See [0009]-[0011], [0015], [0055], and [0066]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of Di to have incorporated the teachings of Ramaswamy for the mere benefit of being able to display the segments in a desired manner. Regarding claim 2, the combination teaches of an image processing apparatus comprising: circuitry configured to generate a bitstream of a partial region constituted by selected subpictures among the subpictures included in a picture based on a request from a second apparatus; and a transmission unit that transmits a bitstream of the partial region to the second apparatus (See analysis of claim 1; Di, Fig.4 and [0161] which discloses of multiple client devices; Ramaswamy, [0053] multiple clients), wherein the selected subpictures are selected using identification information identifying at least one subpicture indicated in the request (See [0212]-[0219] and [0231]). Regarding claim 3, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the circuitry is further configured to extract the selected subpictures constituting the partial region from a bitstream of the picture based on the request (See Di, [0019]-[0027], [0168]-[0187], and [0232]; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 4, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is further configured to identify a subpicture including a segmented region designated using a coordinate in the request (See analysis of claim 1; Di, [0168]-[0173] coordinates in client request), select metadata from which the identified subpicture is extractable, extract the identified subpicture from the bitstream of the picture using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the extracted subpicture (See Di, [0019]-[0027], [0168]-[0187], and [0232]; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 5, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the circuitry is further configured to generate a bitstream of the partial region in a case where a bitstream of the subpicture is requested (See Di, [0019]-[0027], [0168]-[0187], and [0232]; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]), and decode the bitstream of the picture (See Di, [0186] decoding the bitstream by the client) and segment the segmented region from the picture and encodes the segmented region to generate a bitstream of the segmented region in a case where the bitstream of the segmented region is requested (See Ramaswamy, analysis of claim 1 and [0009] encoding of the segmented regions being requested such that the content is displayed according to the users desires at the client device). Regarding claim 6, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is further configured to identify a subpicture including a segmented region designated using information regarding a display region in the request, select metadata from which the identified subpicture is extractable, extracts the identified subpicture from the bitstream of the picture using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the extracted subpicture (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 7, the combination teaches of the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is further configured to select metadata from which a subpicture constituting the partial region designated using identification information in the request is extractable, extract the subpicture from the bitstream of the picture using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the extracted subpicture (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions). Regarding claim 8, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is configured to select metadata from which a subpicture designated using identification information in the request is extractable (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions), extract the subpicture from the bitstream of the picture using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the extracted subpicture (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions). Regarding claim 9, the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is further configured to select metadata from which a subpicture constituting a partial region designated using identification information defined in a control file for controlling distribution of a content file is extractable (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions), extract the subpicture from the bitstream of the picture using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions). Regarding claim 10, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is further configured to select metadata from which a subpicture constituting a partial region, designated in the request among partial regions (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]) defined as an adaptation set in a control file for controlling distribution of a content file, is extractable, extract the subpicture from the bitstream of the picture using the selected metadata (See Di, [0013]-[0023] adaption sets within the mpd file; Ramaswamy, [0054]-[0058]), and generates a bitstream of the designated partial region (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]). Regarding claim 11, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the circuitry is configured to generate metadata for extracting a subpicture designated in the request to extract the subpicture from the bitstream of the picture, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the extracted subpicture (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]). Regarding claim 12, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the circuitry is configured to merge bitstreams of the subpictures constituting the partial region based on the request and generate a bitstream of the partial region (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]). Regarding claim 13, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the circuitry is configured to identify subpictures including a segmented region designated using a coordinate in the request (See Di, [0168]-[0173] coordinate in request), select metadata capable of merging the identified subpictures, merges the identified subpictures using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the merged subpictures (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] merging/multiplexing/combining the multiple region of interests). Regarding claim 14, the claim has been analyzed and rejected for the same reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 5. Regarding claim 15, the combination teaches image processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the circuitry is further configured to identify subpictures including a segmented region designated using information regarding a display region in the request (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]), select metadata capable of merging the identified subpictures, merge bitstreams of the identified subpictures using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the merged subpictures (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]). Regarding claim 16, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the circuitry is further configured to select metadata capable of merging subpictures constituting the partial region designated using identification information in the request, merge the subpictures using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the merged subpictures (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232] coordinates in the display region is requested and uses at least metadata from the mpd file and resolution/bandwidth of the pictures to generate the bitstream of the desired regions; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 17, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the circuitry is further configured to select metadata capable of merging subpictures constituting a partial region designated using identification information defined in a control file for controlling distribution of a content file, and merge the subpictures using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the partial region (See analysis of claim 1; Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 18, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the circuitry is further configured to select metadata capable of merging subpictures constituting a partial region, designated in the request among partial regions defined as an adaptation set in a control file for controlling distribution of a content file, merge the subpictures using the selected metadata, and generate a bitstream of the designated partial region (See analysis of claim 10; See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 19, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the circuitry is further configured to merge subpictures using metadata for merging the subpictures designated in the request, and generate a bitstream of the partial region constituted by the merged subpictures (See Di, [0012]-[0027], [0165]-[0187], and [0232]; Ramaswamy, [0005]-[0015], [0045]-[0054], [0061], and [0069]). Regarding claim 32, the claim has been analyzed and rejected for the same reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 1. Regarding claim 33, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the circuitry segments the segmented region based on partial region information that is included in the control file and indicates a position in the picture of a subpicture constituting the partial region (See Di, [0020]-[0024], Ramaswamy, [0009]-[0014] and [0066]-[0080]). Regarding claim 34, the claim has been analyzed and rejected for the same reasons set forth in the rejection of claim 1. 6. Claims 28 and 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Di et al., US 2019/0238933 in view of Westerlund et al., WO 2018087311. Regarding claim 28, Di the image processing apparatus according to claim 27, wherein the circuitry is further configured to generate the content file, and store the information indicating the position of the subpicture in the partial region of the content file (See analysis of claim 20-22). Di is silent with respect to the storing being in a sample entry of a movie box. However, in the same field of endeavor, Westerlund teaches of storing being in a sample entry of a movie box (See [00131]-[00136). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the teachings of Di to have incorporated the teachings of Westerlund for the mere benefit of compatibility with different types of formats and media files. Regarding claim 30, the combination teaches the image processing apparatus according to claim 29, wherein the circuitry is further configured to generate the content file, and store the partial region information as a sample group in a movie fragment box of the content file (See analysis of claim 28; Westerlund, [00131]-[00136]). Conclusion 7. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Contact 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ricky Chin whose telephone number is 571-270-3753. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:30-6:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Bruckart can be reached on 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 703-872-9306. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Ricky Chin/ Primary Examiner AU 2424 (571) 270-3753 Ricky.Chin@uspto.gov
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 23, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705768
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR ESTIMATING A DEPTH AND ORIENTATION OF A PORTION OF A SCENE USING A SINGLE-PHOTON DETECTOR AND DIFFUSE LIGHT SOURCE
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695944
METHODS AND APPARATUS OF MEDIA DEVICE DETECTION FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE MEDIA METERS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12664788
Method and Device for Video Analysis Based on Image Correction Learning Model
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658026
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED RESOLUTION OF SECURITY ALARM EVENTS USING VIDEO DATA
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12633133
RECOGNITION PROCESSING DEVICE, RECOGNITION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECOGNITION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+21.9%)
3y 3m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 562 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month