Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/693,007

SIDELINK DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION OPERATION METHOD AND DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Priority
Sep 17, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0124635 +2 more
Examiner
THOMAS, WILFRED
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
218 granted / 283 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
320
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
73.8%
+33.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 283 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This communication is in response to applicant’s response filed under 37 C.F.R. §1.111 in response to a non-final office action. Claims 1-6, and 11 have been amended. Claims 1-11 are subject to examination. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6-9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshioka et al. (Yoshioka hereafter) (US 20240357644 A1) in view of Zhang (Zhang hereafter) (US 20240267986 A1) and in further view of Freda et al. (Freda hereafter) ( US 20230097552 A1). Regarding claim 1 Yoshioka teaches, an operation method of a first user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system, the operation method comprising: transmitting by a first user equipment (UE) (terminal 20A performs SL transmission to the terminal 20B) a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) (SL transmission resource (PSCCH/PSCCH)) to a second UE based on a resource based on a first resource allocation mode (in the resource allocation mode 1) (Yoshioka; [0067] As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the resource allocation mode 1, an SL transmission resource is allocated to the terminal 20A from the base station 10. That is, as illustrated in FIG. 3, an SL transmission resource (PSCCH/PSCCH) is allocated to the terminal 20A according to a PDCCH (specifically, DCI) received from the base station 10, and the terminal 20A performs SL transmission to the terminal 20B by using the transmission resource); transmitting, by the first UE a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH) to the second UE (transmission of a PSSCH ) based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode (resource allocation mode 1) (Yoshioka; [0172] The sidelink transmission can be performed to satisfy the channel access requirements by performing an LBT at the time of transmission of a PSCCH/PSSCH in the resource allocation mode 1); Yoshioka fails to explicitly teach, based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode being not included in a sidelink discontinuous reception (SL DRX) active time of the second UE, switching a resource allocation mode from the first resource allocation mode to a resource allocation mode 2 transmitting by the first UE sidelink data to the second UE based on a resource based on the resource allocation mode 2. wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE. However, in the same field of endeavor Zhang teaches, based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode being not included in a sidelink discontinuous reception (SL DRX) active time of the second UE (the peer terminal device will communicate with the UE without adopting SL DRX (i.e. always active)), switching a resource allocation mode from the first resource allocation mode to a resource allocation mode 2 ([0293] switches to mode 2 SL RA) (Zhang; [0291] For example, if the terminal device is currently adopting mode 1 SL resource allocation (RA), the terminal device may further any one or more of the followings: [0292] It informs the peer terminal device via. e.g. the assistance information and/or SL capability information that it will be active all the time or cannot adopt SL DRX for its transmission. Correspondingly the peer terminal device will communicate with the UE without adopting SL DRX (i.e. always active). The peer terminal device may send a PC5 connection release message to the UE if it cannot accept communication without SL DRX); and transmitting by the first UE sidelink data to the second UE (SL DRX could be adopted after the terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA.) based on a resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 (The terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA) (Zhang; [0293] The terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA, potentially based on an assistance message received from the peer terminal device indicating that the peer terminal device needs to perform communication with SL DRX configured. SL DRX could be adopted after the terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka to include the above recited limitations as taught by Zhang in order to perform unicast communication with SL DRX (Zhang; [0290]). Yoshioka-Zhang fails to explicitly teach, wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE. However, in the same field of endeavor Freda teaches, wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time (WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity ... changed by Uu activity) (Freda; [0004] The WTRU may receive a set of sidelink DRX parameters that are independent of parameters configured for Uu DRX. The WTRU may receive a scheduled sidelink grant from a network during its Uu active time (i.e., the time when the WTRU actively monitors PDCCH). The WTRU may receive a first DRX configuration associated with Uu and receive a second DRX configuration associated with sidelink DRX. [0005] A WTRU may determine a value of a timer associated with Uu and/or sidelink DRX based on sidelink timing information related to a sidelink transmission. [0006] A WTRU may inform a peer WTRU of its activity behavior on Uu. A WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior which may be impacted or changed by Uu activity behavior. [0096-0102] WTRU may perform SL decoding based on Uu DRX activity behavior, and may modify/update parameters (e.g. timers) related to Uu DRX upon a SL event. For example, a WTRU may reset a timer related to UL scheduling (e.g. existing or new activity timer) upon occurrence of any or a combination of the following events. The WTRU may receive PSCCH/PSCCH with data intended for/decoded by the WTRU. The WTRU may receive a DCI on a PDCCH that indicates a new SL transmission. For example, the WTRU may restart a drx-InactivityTimer if the PDCCH indicates a new UL or DL or SL transmission, [0117])of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE (Freda; [0122] A WTRU may inform a peer WTRU or group of peer WTRUs of its activity behavior on Uu such as a change in Uu behavior activity. A WTRU may provide a peer WTRU or group of peer WTRUs with parameters or values related to a DRX state, an indication of events which affect a scheduled period of PDCCH monitoring, and the like. A WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior which may be impacted or changed by Uu activity behavior, [0123-0124]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka-Zhang to include the above recited limitations as taught by Freda in order to send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior changed by Uu activity behavior. (Freda; [0122]). Regarding claim 6 Yoshioka teaches, A first user equipment (UE) operating in a wireless communication system, the first UE comprising: one or more transceivers (Yoshioka; FIG. 20 [0277] the terminal 20 includes a transmission unit 210, a reception unit 220); one or more processors configured to control the one or more transceivers (Yoshioka; FIG. 21 [0283] the terminal 20 may be physically a computer device including a processor 1001, a storage device 1002, an auxiliary storage device 1003,); and a memory including one or more instructions performed by the one or more processors (Yoshioka; FIG. 21 [0285] the storage device 1002, and by controlling communication by the communication device 1004 and controlling at least one of reading and writing of data in the storage device 1002 and the auxiliary storage device 1003), wherein the one or more instructions comprise (Yoshioka; [0320]): transmitting (terminal 20A performs SL transmission to the terminal 20B) a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) (SL transmission resource (PSCCH/PSCCH)) to a second UE based on a resource based on a first resource allocation mode (in the resource allocation mode 1) (Yoshioka; [0067] As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the resource allocation mode 1, an SL transmission resource is allocated to the terminal 20A from the base station 10. That is, as illustrated in FIG. 3, an SL transmission resource (PSCCH/PSCCH) is allocated to the terminal 20A according to a PDCCH (specifically, DCI) received from the base station 10, and the terminal 20A performs SL transmission to the terminal 20B by using the transmission resource); transmitting a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH) to the second UE (transmission of a PSSCH ) based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode (resource allocation mode 1) (Yoshioka; [0172] The sidelink transmission can be performed to satisfy the channel access requirements by performing an LBT at the time of transmission of a PSCCH/PSSCH in the resource allocation mode 1 ); Yoshioka fails to explicitly teach, based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode being not included in a sidelink discontinuous reception (SL DRX) active time of the second UE, switching a resource allocation mode from the first resource allocation mode to a resource allocation mode 2. transmitting sidelink data to the second UE based on a resource based on the resource allocation mode 2. wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE. However, in the same field of endeavor Zhang teaches, based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode being not included ([0292] SL capability information that it will be active all the time or cannot adopt SL DRX for its transmission.) in a sidelink discontinuous reception (SL DRX) active time of the second UE (the peer terminal device will communicate with the UE without adopting SL DRX (i.e. always active)), switching a resource allocation mode from the first resource allocation mode to a resource allocation mode 2 ([0293] switches to mode 2 SL RA) (Zhang; [0291] For example, if the terminal device is currently adopting mode 1 SL resource allocation (RA), the terminal device may further any one or more of the followings: [0292] It informs the peer terminal device via. e.g. the assistance information and/or SL capability information that it will be active all the time or cannot adopt SL DRX for its transmission. Correspondingly the peer terminal device will communicate with the UE without adopting SL DRX (i.e. always active). The peer terminal device may send a PC5 connection release message to the UE if it cannot accept communication without SL DRX); and transmitting sidelink data to the second UE (SL DRX could be adopted after the terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA.) based on a resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 (The terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA) (Zhang; [0293] The terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA, potentially based on an assistance message received from the peer terminal device indicating that the peer terminal device needs to perform communication with SL DRX configured. SL DRX could be adopted after the terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka to include the above recited limitations as taught by Zhang in order to perform unicast communication with SL DRX (Zhang; [0290]). Yoshioka-Zhang fails to explicitly teach, wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE. However, in the same field of endeavor Fred teaches, wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time (WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity ... changed by Uu activity) (Freda; [0004] The WTRU may receive a set of sidelink DRX parameters that are independent of parameters configured for Uu DRX. The WTRU may receive a scheduled sidelink grant from a network during its Uu active time (i.e., the time when the WTRU actively monitors PDCCH). The WTRU may receive a first DRX configuration associated with Uu and receive a second DRX configuration associated with sidelink DRX. [0005] A WTRU may determine a value of a timer associated with Uu and/or sidelink DRX based on sidelink timing information related to a sidelink transmission. [0006] A WTRU may inform a peer WTRU of its activity behavior on Uu. A WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior which may be impacted or changed by Uu activity behavior. [0096-0102] WTRU may perform SL decoding based on Uu DRX activity behavior, and may modify/update parameters (e.g. timers) related to Uu DRX upon a SL event. For example, a WTRU may reset a timer related to UL scheduling (e.g. existing or new activity timer) upon occurrence of any or a combination of the following events. The WTRU may receive PSCCH/PSCCH with data intended for/decoded by the WTRU. The WTRU may receive a DCI on a PDCCH that indicates a new SL transmission. For example, the WTRU may restart a drx-InactivityTimer if the PDCCH indicates a new UL or DL or SL transmission, [0117])of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE (Freda; [0122] A WTRU may inform a peer WTRU or group of peer WTRUs of its activity behavior on Uu such as a change in Uu behavior activity. A WTRU may provide a peer WTRU or group of peer WTRUs with parameters or values related to a DRX state, an indication of events which affect a scheduled period of PDCCH monitoring, and the like. A WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior which may be impacted or changed by Uu activity behavior, [0123-0124]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka-Zhang to include the above recited limitations as taught by Freda in order to send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior changed by Uu activity behavior. (Freda; [0122]). Regarding claim 11 Yoshioka teaches, A device comprising: one or more memories(Yoshioka; FIG. 21 [0285] the storage device 1002, and by controlling communication by the communication device 1004 and controlling at least one of reading and writing of data in the storage device 1002 and the auxiliary storage device 1003.); and one or more processors operably connected to the one or more memories, wherein the one or more processors are configured (Yoshioka; FIG. 21 [0283] terminal 20 may be physically a computer device including a processor 1001, a storage device 1002, an auxiliary storage device 1003, a communication device 1004,) to allow the device to: transmit (terminal 20A performs SL transmission to the terminal 20B) a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) (SL transmission resource (PSCCH/PSCCH)) to a second UE based on a resource based on a first resource allocation mode (in the resource allocation mode 1) (Yoshioka; [0067] As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the resource allocation mode 1, an SL transmission resource is allocated to the terminal 20A from the base station 10. That is, as illustrated in FIG. 3, an SL transmission resource (PSCCH/PSCCH) is allocated to the terminal 20A according to a PDCCH (specifically, DCI) received from the base station 10, and the terminal 20A performs SL transmission to the terminal 20B by using the transmission resource); transmit a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH) to the second UE (transmission of a PSSCH ) based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode (resource allocation mode 1) (Yoshioka; [0172] The sidelink transmission can be performed to satisfy the channel access requirements by performing an LBT at the time of transmission of a PSCCH/PSSCH in the resource allocation mode 1 ); Yoshioka fails to explicitly teach, based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode being not included in a sidelink discontinuous reception (SL DRX) active time of the second UE, switching a resource allocation mode from the first resource allocation mode to a resource allocation mode 2. transmit sidelink data to the second UE based on a resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE. However, in the same field of endeavor Zhang teaches, based on the resource based on the first resource allocation mode being not included ([0292] SL capability information that it will be active all the time or cannot adopt SL DRX for its transmission.) in a sidelink discontinuous reception (SL DRX) active time of the second UE (the peer terminal device will communicate with the UE without adopting SL DRX (i.e. always active)), switching a resource allocation mode from the first resource allocation mode to a resource allocation mode 2 ([0293] switches to mode 2 SL RA) (Zhang; [0291] For example, if the terminal device is currently adopting mode 1 SL resource allocation (RA), the terminal device may further any one or more of the followings: [0292] It informs the peer terminal device via. e.g. the assistance information and/or SL capability information that it will be active all the time or cannot adopt SL DRX for its transmission. Correspondingly the peer terminal device will communicate with the UE without adopting SL DRX (i.e. always active). The peer terminal device may send a PC5 connection release message to the UE if it cannot accept communication without SL DRX); and transmit sidelink data to the second UE (SL DRX could be adopted after the terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA.) based on a resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 (The terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA) (Zhang; [0293] The terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA, potentially based on an assistance message received from the peer terminal device indicating that the peer terminal device needs to perform communication with SL DRX configured. SL DRX could be adopted after the terminal device switches to mode 2 SL RA). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka to include the above recited limitations as taught by Zhang in order to perform unicast communication with SL DRX (Zhang; [0290]). Yoshioka-Zhang fails to explicitly teach, wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE. However, in the same field of endeavor Freda teaches, wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is determined to be not included in the SL DRX active time (WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity ... changed by Uu activity) (Freda; [0004] The WTRU may receive a set of sidelink DRX parameters that are independent of parameters configured for Uu DRX. The WTRU may receive a scheduled sidelink grant from a network during its Uu active time (i.e., the time when the WTRU actively monitors PDCCH). The WTRU may receive a first DRX configuration associated with Uu and receive a second DRX configuration associated with sidelink DRX. [0005] A WTRU may determine a value of a timer associated with Uu and/or sidelink DRX based on sidelink timing information related to a sidelink transmission. [0006] A WTRU may inform a peer WTRU of its activity behavior on Uu. A WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior which may be impacted or changed by Uu activity behavior. [0096-0102] WTRU may perform SL decoding based on Uu DRX activity behavior, and may modify/update parameters (e.g. timers) related to Uu DRX upon a SL event. For example, a WTRU may reset a timer related to UL scheduling (e.g. existing or new activity timer) upon occurrence of any or a combination of the following events. The WTRU may receive PSCCH/PSCCH with data intended for/decoded by the WTRU. The WTRU may receive a DCI on a PDCCH that indicates a new SL transmission. For example, the WTRU may restart a drx-InactivityTimer if the PDCCH indicates a new UL or DL or SL transmission, [0117])of the second UE based on not receiving a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) from the second UE (Freda; [0122] A WTRU may inform a peer WTRU or group of peer WTRUs of its activity behavior on Uu such as a change in Uu behavior activity. A WTRU may provide a peer WTRU or group of peer WTRUs with parameters or values related to a DRX state, an indication of events which affect a scheduled period of PDCCH monitoring, and the like. A WTRU may send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior which may be impacted or changed by Uu activity behavior, [0123-0124]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka-Zhang to include the above recited limitations as taught by Freda in order to send parameters related to sidelink activity behavior changed by Uu activity behavior. (Freda; [0122]). Regarding claims 2 and 7 Yoshioka-Zhang-Freda teaches, the claims 1 and 6, Yoshioka-Freda fails to explicitly teach, wherein the first UE operates in a sidelink transmission mode2 Zhang further teaches, wherein the first UE operates in a sidelink transmission mode 2 (Zhang; [0311] the terminal device may keep using the current SL DRX configuration and switches to mode 2 SL RA if mode 1 SL RA is adopted currently). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka-Freda to include the above recited limitations as taught by Zhang in order to perform unicast communication with SL DRX (Zhang; [0290]). Regarding claims 3 and 8 Yoshioka-Zhang-Freda teaches, the claims 1 and 6, Yoshioka further teaches wherein the resource based on the first resource allocation mode is allocated from a base station (Yoshioka; [0067] As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the resource allocation mode 1, an SL transmission resource is allocated to the terminal 20A from the base station 10). Regarding claims 4 and 9 Yoshioka-Zhang-Freda teaches, the claims 1 and 6, Yoshioka-Freda fails to explicitly teach, wherein the resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 is selected by performing a sensing or resource selection procedure Zhang further teaches, wherein the resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 is selected by performing a sensing or resource selection procedure (Zhang; [0206] mode 2: The UE autonomously selects sidelink resources from a (pre-)configured sidelink resource pool(s) based on the channel sensing mechanism.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka-Freda to include the above recited limitations as taught by Zhang in order to perform unicast communication with SL DRX (Zhang; [0290]). Claims 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshioka-Zhang-Freda as applied to claims 1 and 6 above, and further in view of Bonneville et al. (Bonneville hereafter) (US 20220386198 A1). Regarding claims 5 and 10 Yoshioka-Zhang-Freda teaches, the claims 1 and 6, Yoshioka-Freda fails to explicitly teach, wherein the resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 is based on a sidelink exceptional pool. However, in the same field of endeavor Bonneville teaches, wherein the resource based on the resource allocation mode 2 is based on a sidelink exceptional pool (Bonneville; [0045] Direct communications may use radio resources allocated dynamically by a base station (‘mode 1’), or resources to be taken autonomously by a user equipment (UE) corresponding to a respective mobile device from a pool of resources which may be signaled by a base station or pre-configured in the UEs (‘mode 2’)). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date to create the invention of Yoshioka-Zhang-Freda to include the above recited limitations as taught by Bonneville in order to use fallback link to a destination sidelink to exchange signals (Bonneville; [0049]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILFRED THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)270-0353. The examiner can normally be reached Mon -Thurs 9:00 am-4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Noel R Beharry can be reached at 571-270-5630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /W. T/Examiner, Art Unit 2416 /KENNY S LIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 02, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12732997
PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL WITH MULTI- TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS (TRPS)
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12696214
UPLINK TIMING AND FREQUENCY SYNCHRONIZATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689913
SOFT HAND-OFF AND ROUTING DATA IN A VIRTUALIZED DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12665651
ACTIVE BEAM MANAGEMENT, CONFIGURATION, AND CAPABILITY SIGNALING
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12641615
TERMINAL DEVICE, BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.4%)
3y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 283 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month