Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/693,093

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BEAM MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Priority
Sep 22, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021119700
Examiner
ISLAM, ROWNAK
Art Unit
2474
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 454 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
473
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
69.7%
+29.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 454 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is a response to amendment filed on 04/24/2026. Claims 1, 4, 12, 15 and 45 are amended. Claims 3, 9 – 10, 14, 20 – 21, 23 – 44 and 47 – 50 are cancelled. Claims 1 – 2, 4 – 8, 11 – 13, 15 – 19, 22 and 45 – 46 are pending and ready for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 3/12/2026 and 06/23/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 04/24/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant amended the independent claims 1, 12 and 45 by adding the limitations of the dependent claims (claims 3 and 14); therefore, the same rejection has been kept in view of previously cited prior arts GUO et al. (WO 2021/143652 A1) and Matsumura et al. (US 2024/0306024 A1). Applicant argued on 2nd page: last paragraph of the remark, that two resource settings are respectively used for channel measurement and interference measurement, with different functions, and are not respectively corresponding to channel measurement resource (CMR) sets of different remote radio heads (RRHs). Moreover, GUO does not use the term "CMR" at all, nor does it contain the concepts of "CMR resource set" or "CMR resource subset." According to applicant “In GUO, resource settings directly contain lists of reference signal resources, and there is no hierarchical association between resource settings and CMR resource sets. Although GUO mentions a first network device 200a and a second network device 200b (which can be regarded as RRHs), it does not establish a one-to-one correspondence between resource settings and these RRHs. Therefore, GUO fails to disclose option 1, option 2 or option 3. Examiner respectfully agrees that GUO does not specifically recite “measurement resource (CMR) sets” as required by the claim; but the secondary reference Matsumura teaches the limitation in question. GUO recites in Pg.8: lines 8-11 that the terminal device 100 is configured with two resource settings; the first resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or SS/PBCH blocks for channel measurements and the second resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or ZP CSI-RS resources for interference measurement. Here, each of the resource setting is associated with a resource set (reference signal resources); examiner agreed that they are not CMR sets; but Matsumura teaches the CMR sets. GUO further teaches in Fig. 4, step S44 and Pg.9: lines 5-6 that the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and a second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b. As mentioned in Pg.8: lines 8-11, the first and the second resource settings comprise reference signal resource sets and in Pg.9: lines 5-6 the first and the second set of reference signal resource sets correspond to the first and the second network devices, respectively; therefore, it is obvious to consider the plurality of resource settings are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads. Accordingly, applicant’s argument that GUO does not establish a one-to-one correspondence between resource settings and the remote radio heads (RRHs) is not proper. Applicant argued on 3rd page: 2nd paragraph of the remark “Matsumura discusses in detail CSI measurement and reporting in multi-TRP scenarios, and extensively uses terms such as "CMR," "resource setting," and "CMR resource set." However, Matsumura still fails to disclose any of options 1-3 of claim 1.” According to applicant, “paragraph [0134] of Matsumura defines: "resource setting for channel measurement, a resource for channel measurement, a CSI-RS resource for channel measurement, resourcesForChannelMeasurement, a CMR, and a CMR resource may be interchangeably interpreted as each other." This definition equates "resource setting" with "CMR," meaning that each resource setting itself is a CMR resource, rather than "a resource setting associated with a CMR resource set." This is completely different from the inclusion relationship between resource settings and CMR resource sets as required in claim 1”. Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s argument and conclusion. Matsumura teaches according to ¶ [0134] that resource setting for channel measurement, and a CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted as each other. Here, the resource setting equates/ links/ associates to a CMR resource/ resource set. It is well known that a resource set comprises one or more resources; therefore, with broadest reasonable interpretation a CMR resource set comprises a CMR resource. Accordingly, a resource setting is associated with a CMR resource set. So, applicant’s argument is not appropriate that Matsumura does not teach “each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set”. Applicant argued on 3rd page: 4th paragraph of the remark “paragraph [0208] and Figure 20 of Matsumura show: "CMRs #0 to #3 correspond to TRP#1, and CMRs #4 to #7 correspond to TRP#2." This illustrates the correspondence between CMRs and TRPs, but does not involve resource settings. All CMRs (#0-#7) in Figure 20 are configured in the same context and are not divided into multiple resource settings. According to applicant, Matsumura does not explicitly establish a one-to-one correspondence between these resource sets and different RRHs, nor does it disclose the structure of option 2 where "multiple resource settings each associated with one CMR resource set and in one-to-one correspondence with RRHs." Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s remarks. First of all GUO discloses a plurality of resource settings and the plurality of resource settings are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads (described in argument 1 above). Secondly, Matsumura discloses in ¶ [0208] that each of the plurality of RRHs is associated with a set of CMRs; therefore, Matsumura definitely teaches a one-to-one correspondence between these resource sets and different RRHs. Matsumura further teaches in ¶ [0091], the CSI report configuration for the joint CSI report includes a resource configuration for each TRP (at least one of the resource setting for channel measurement….). Here, each TRP is associated with at least one resource setting for channel measurement. As mentioned regarding Fig.20, the two TRPs are associated with two sets of CMRs; therefore, it is obvious to consider that two CMR resource sets associated with two TRPs, which are linked to different resource settings. Accordingly, applicant’s argument is not convincing. Applicant argued on 3rd page: last paragraph of the remark “Matsumura does not involve the concept of "CMR resource subset," nor does it disclose a configuration where one CMR resource set is further divided into multiple subsets with a one-to-one correspondence with RRHs. According to applicant, Matsumura fails to disclose option 1, option 2, or option 3 of claim 1. Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s comment and conclusions. As described above, the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the limitations of option 2, therefore, Matsumura does not need to teach "CMR resource subset," of option 3. Accordingly, applicant’s argument is not accurate. Applicant argued on 4th page: 3rd paragraph of the remark “none of GUO, Matsumura, or Nagata disclose any of the three configurations of claim 1.” Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s comment. The rejection below and the response to the argument above clearly shows that the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the limitations of currently amended independent claim 1; therefore, applicant’s argument is not appropriate. Applicant argued on 4th page: 4th paragraph of the remark, “Claims 12 and 45, although different in scope, recite similar limitations to those argued above and are likewise allowable”. Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s comment. As mentioned above, the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the limitations of the claim 1; therefore, same rationale applies for claims 12 and 45 as well. Accordingly, claims 12 and 45 are not allowable. Applicant argued on 4th page: last paragraph of the remark “Dependent claims of claims 1 and 12 are patentable for at least the same reasons, and for the additional features recited therein”. Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s remark. The combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the limitations of the independent claims 1 and 12. Therefore, the dependent claims are not allowable because of their dependency from the independent claim. Finally, examiner would like to cite a new reference (US 2024/0014965 A1, ¶ [0078] – [0079]) that also teaches multiple resource settings associate with CMR resource set. Examiner respectfully disagrees with all the argument filed by the applicant. All arguments and remarks are replied in detail in the rejection section below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 2, 4 – 7, 11 – 13, 15 – 18, 22 and 45 – 46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over GUO et al. (GUO hereinafter referred to GUO) (WO 2021/143652 A1) in view of Matsumura et al. (Matsumura hereinafter referred to Matsumura) (US 2024/0306024 A1). (Currently Amended) Regarding claim 1, GUO teaches a method for beam measurement and reporting (Title, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR GROUP-BASED BEAM MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING), performed by a terminal (Fig. 4 and Pg.8: line 16, a flowchart of the operation of a terminal device 100), comprising: receiving configuration information, wherein the configuration information comprises at least two reference signal resources (Fig. 4, step S42 and Pg.8: lines 38-40, The terminal device 100 is configured with one or more NZP CSI-RS resource set configuration(s) as indicated by the higher layer parameters CSI-ResourceConfig, and NZP-CSI-RS-ResourceSet. Each NZP CSI-RS resource set consists of K≥1 NZP CSI-RS resource(s). Here, NZP CSI-RS resources are two reference signal resources), and the at least two reference signal resources correspond to different remote radio heads respectively (Fig. 4, step S44 and Pg.9: lines 4-6, the terminal device 100 receives a first beam comprising the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and receives a second beam comprising a second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b. Here, the network devices 200a and 200b are two different remote radio heads); wherein the configuration information is configured as one of (Due to alternative language “as one of” in the claim, examiner addresses one limitation only): the configuration information comprising one resource setting, wherein the resource setting is associated with a plurality of channel measurement resource (CMR) resource sets, the plurality of CMR resource sets are in a one-to-one correspondence with a plurality of remote radio heads, and the reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in different CMR resource sets in the plurality of CMR resource sets; the configuration information comprising a plurality of resource settings (Pg.8: line 8, The terminal device 100 is configured with two resource settings), wherein each resource setting is associated with resource set (Pg.8: lines 8-11, The first resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or SS/PBCH blocks for channel measurements and the second resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or ZP CSI-RS resources for interference measurement. Here, each of the resource setting is associated with a resource set), the plurality of resource settings are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads (Fig. 4, step S44 and Pg.9: lines 5-6, the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and a second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b); or the configuration information comprising one resource setting, wherein the resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set, wherein the CMR resource set comprises a plurality of CMR resource subsets, the plurality of CMR resource subsets are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads, and reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in different CMR resource subsets in the plurality of CMR resource subsets. GUO does not specifically teach wherein each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set, and reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in CMR resource sets associated with different resource settings in the plurality of resource settings. However, Matsumura teaches (Title, TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION) wherein each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set ([0134], resource setting for channel measurement, a resource for channel measurement, …, a CMR, and a CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted as each other), and reference signal resources ([0100], CSI-RS resources for channel measurement (CMR). Here, CMR is reference signal resources) corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in CMR resource sets (Fig.20 and [0208], CMRs #0 to #3 correspond to TRP #1, and CMRs #4 to #7 correspond to TRP #2. Here, the CMRs #0 to #3 and the CMRs #4 to #7 are considered as two CMR resource sets correspond to two TRPs) associated with different resource settings in the plurality of resource settings ([0208], the CMRs corresponding to TRP #1 is configured first, and the CMRs corresponding to TRP #2 is configured subsequently. As mentioned above, the resource setting for channel measurement and the CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted; therefore, it is obvious that two CMR resource sets associated with different resource settings). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified GUO as mentioned above and further incorporate the teaching of Matsumura. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide measurement and report of CSI for a multi panel/TRP that can be appropriately performed (Matsumura, Abstract and [0001]). (Currently Amended) Regarding claim 12, GUO teaches a method for beam measurement and reporting (Title, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR GROUP-BASED BEAM MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING), performed by a network device (Fig. 5 and Pg.10: line 5, a flowchart of the operation of operations of a network device 200), comprising: sending configuration information (Fig. 5, and Pg.10: lines 28-29, the network device 200 configures the terminal device 100 to receive and report multiple beams simultaneously; line 31, transmit information to configure the terminal device 100), wherein the configuration information comprises at least two reference signal resources (Fig. 5, and Pg.10: lines 28-29, the network device 200 configures the terminal device 100 to receive and report multiple beams simultaneously), and the at least two reference signal resources correspond to different remote radio heads respectively (Fig. 5, step S53 and Pg.10: lines 50 – Pg.11: line 1, the first network device 200a transmits a first beam comprising a first set of reference signal resource and the second network device 200b transmits a second beam comprising a second set of reference signal resources to the terminal device 100. Here, the network devices 200a and 200b are two different remote radio heads and the first set and the second sets of reference signal resources are two reference signal resources); wherein the configuration information is configured as one of (Due to alternative language “as one of” in the claim, examiner addresses one limitation only): the configuration information comprising one resource setting, wherein the resource setting is associated with a plurality of channel measurement resource (CMR) resource sets, the plurality of CMR resource sets are in a one-to-one correspondence with a plurality of remote radio heads, and the reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in different CMR resource sets in the plurality of CMR resource sets; the configuration information comprising a plurality of resource settings (Pg.8: line 8, The terminal device 100 is configured with two resource settings), wherein each resource setting is associated with resource set (Pg.8: lines 8-11, The first resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or SS/PBCH blocks for channel measurements and the second resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or ZP CSI-RS resources for interference measurement. Here, each of the resource setting is associated with a resource set), the plurality of resource settings are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads (Fig. 4, step S44 and Pg.9: lines 5-6, the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and a second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b); or the configuration information comprising one resource setting, wherein the resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set, wherein the CMR resource set comprises a plurality of CMR resource subsets, the plurality of CMR resource subsets are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads, and reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in different CMR resource subsets in the plurality of CMR resource subsets. GUO does not specifically teach wherein each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set, and reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in CMR resource sets associated with different resource settings in the plurality of resource settings. However, Matsumura teaches (Title, TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION) wherein each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set ([0134], resource setting for channel measurement, a resource for channel measurement, …, a CMR, and a CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted as each other. Here, the resource setting corresponds to a CMR resource/ resource set), and reference signal resources ([0100], CSI-RS resources for channel measurement (CMR). Here, CMR is reference signal resources) corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in CMR resource sets (Fig.20 and [0208], CMRs #0 to #3 correspond to TRP #1, and CMRs #4 to #7 correspond to TRP #2. Here, the CMRs #0 to #3 and the CMRs #4 to #7 are considered as two CMR resource sets correspond to two TRPs) associated with different resource settings in the plurality of resource settings ([0208], the CMRs corresponding to TRP #1 is configured first, and the CMRs corresponding to TRP #2 is configured subsequently. As mentioned above, the resource setting for channel measurement and the CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted; therefore, it is obvious that two CMR resource sets associated with different resource settings). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified GUO as mentioned above and further incorporate the teaching of Matsumura. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide measurement and report of CSI for a multi panel/TRP that can be appropriately performed (Matsumura, Abstract and [0001]). (Original) Regarding claims 2 and 13, the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 1 and 12, respectively as outlined above, GUO further teaches wherein the different remote radio heads correspond to at least one of (Due to alternative language “at least one of” in the claims, examiner addresses one limitation only): different transmission and reception points (Fig.1 and Pg.5: lines 34-35, Each of the first and second network devices 200a, 200b comprises a transmission-reception point (TRP)); different control resource set pools; or different antenna panels. (Currently Amended) Regarding claim 45, GUO teaches (Title, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR GROUP-BASED BEAM MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING), a communication device (Fig. 2 and Pg.6: line 8, a terminal device 100), comprising: a processor (Fig. 2 and Pg.6: line 12, processing unit 120); and a memory having a computer program stored thereon (Pg.15: lines 37-38, computer readable media includes any type of medium suitable for storing, encoding, or carrying a series of instructions); wherein the processor is configured (Pg.6: lines 36-37, The processing unit 120 is configured to control the overall functionality of the terminal device 100) to: receive configuration information, wherein the configuration information comprises at least two reference signal resources (Fig. 4, step S42 and Pg.8: lines 38-40, The terminal device 100 is configured with one or more NZP CSI-RS resource set configuration(s) as indicated by the higher layer parameters CSI-ResourceConfig, and NZP-CSI-RS-ResourceSet. Each NZP CSI-RS resource set consists of K≥1 NZP CSI-RS resource(s). Here, NZP CSI-RS resources are two reference signal resources), and the at least two reference signal resources correspond to different remote radio heads respectively (Fig. 4, step S44 and Pg.9: lines 4-6, the terminal device 100 receives a first beam comprising the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and receives a second beam comprising a second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b. Here, the network devices 200a and 200b are two different remote radio heads); wherein the configuration information is configured as one of (Due to alternative language “as one of” in the claim, examiner addresses one limitation only): the configuration information comprising one resource setting, wherein the resource setting is associated with a plurality of channel measurement resource (CMR) resource sets, the plurality of CMR resource sets are in a one-to-one correspondence with a plurality of remote radio heads, and the reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in different CMR resource sets in the plurality of CMR resource sets; the configuration information comprising a plurality of resource settings (Pg.8: line 8, The terminal device 100 is configured with two resource settings), wherein each resource setting is associated with resource set (Pg.8: lines 8-11, The first resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or SS/PBCH blocks for channel measurements and the second resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or ZP CSI-RS resources for interference measurement. Here, each of the resource setting is associated with a resource set), the plurality of resource settings are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads (Fig. 4, step S44 and Pg.9: lines 5-6, the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and a second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b); or the configuration information comprising one resource setting, wherein the resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set, wherein the CMR resource set comprises a plurality of CMR resource subsets, the plurality of CMR resource subsets are in a one-to-one correspondence with the plurality of remote radio heads, and reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in different CMR resource subsets in the plurality of CMR resource subsets. GUO does not specifically teach wherein each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set, and reference signal resources corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in CMR resource sets associated with different resource settings in the plurality of resource settings. However, Matsumura teaches (Title, TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION) wherein each resource setting is associated with one CMR resource set ([0134], resource setting for channel measurement, a resource for channel measurement, …, a CMR, and a CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted as each other. Here, the resource setting corresponds to a CMR resource/ resource set), and reference signal resources ([0100], CSI-RS resources for channel measurement (CMR). Here, CMR is reference signal resources) corresponding to different remote radio heads are comprised in CMR resource sets (Fig.20 and [0208], CMRs #0 to #3 correspond to TRP #1, and CMRs #4 to #7 correspond to TRP #2. Here, the CMRs #0 to #3 and the CMRs #4 to #7 are considered as two CMR resource sets correspond to two TRPs) associated with different resource settings in the plurality of resource settings ([0208], the CMRs corresponding to TRP #1 is configured first, and the CMRs corresponding to TRP #2 is configured subsequently. As mentioned above, the resource setting for channel measurement and the CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted; therefore, it is obvious that two CMR resource sets associated with different resource settings). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified GUO as mentioned above and further incorporate the teaching of Matsumura. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide measurement and report of CSI for a multi panel/TRP that can be appropriately performed (Matsumura, Abstract and [0001]). (Previously Presented) Regarding claim 46, the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claim 12 as outlined above. GUO further teaches a communication device (Fig. 3 and Pg.7: line 28, network device 200), comprising: a processor (Fig. 3 and Pg.7: line 30, processing unit 220); and a memory having a computer program stored thereon (Pg.15: lines 37-38, computer readable media includes any type of medium suitable for storing, encoding, or carrying a series of instructions); wherein the processor is configured to perform the method of claim 12 (Pg.7: lines 39-40, The processing unit 220 is configured to control the overall functionality of the network device 200). (Currently Amended) Regarding claims 4 and 15, combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 1 and 12, respectively as outlined above. GUO does not specifically teach receiving first indication information, wherein the first indication information is used to implement at least one of: activating or deactivating M CMR resource sets; activating or deactivating M CMR resource subsets; activating or deactivating M resource settings; indicating M CMR resource sets; indicating M CMR resource subsets; or indicating M resource settings; wherein, M is a positive integer greater than or equal to 1. However, Matsumura teaches receiving first indication information ([0293], The UE is configured with one or a plurality of pieces of CMR group configuration information by RRC signaling. Here, RRC is a first indication information), wherein the first indication information is used to implement at least one of (Due to alternative language “at least one of” in the claims, examiner addresses one limitation only): activating or deactivating M CMR resource sets; activating or deactivating M CMR resource subsets; activating or deactivating M resource settings; indicating M CMR resource sets ([0293], One piece of CMR group configuration information includes information indicating the CMRs included in one CMR group or includes information indicating the CMRs respectively included in a plurality of CMR groups. Here, CMRs are considered as M CMR resource sets); indicating M CMR resource subsets; or indicating M resource settings; wherein, M is a positive integer greater than or equal to 1. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified combination of GUO and Matsumura as mentioned in claims 1 and 12 and further incorporate the teaching of Matsumura. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide measurement and report of CSI for a multi panel/TRP that can be appropriately performed (Matsumura, Abstract and [0001]). (Original) Regarding claims 5 and 16, combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 4 and 15, respectively as outlined above. GUO further teaches sending/ receiving a first measurement result report (Fig. 4, step S47 and Pg.9: line 22, the terminal device 100 transmits the generated beam report; Pg.9: lines 17-18, terminal device 100 includes measurement results within the beam report. Here, the generated beam report is a first measurement result report); wherein the first measurement result report comprises a plurality of groups (Pg.10: lines 1-4, the terminal device 100 is configured with the higher layer parameter groupBasedBeamReporting set to 'enabled', the terminal device 100 reports in a single reporting instance K pairs of two different CSI-RS resource indicators (CRis) or SS/PBCH resource block indicators (SSBRis) for each report setting; line 18, Exemplary values of K are 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8. Here, the reports comprises K pairs of two different resource indicators; therefore, the first measurement result report comprises a plurality of groups), N reference signals (RSs) in each group are able to be simultaneously received by the terminal, N is a positive integer greater than or equal to 2 (Pg.10: lines 4-6, within each pair of CRis or SSBRis, the CSI-RS and/or synchronization signal block (SSB) resources are received simultaneously by the terminal device 100; Pg.3: line 13-16, The beam report comprises measurement results of each reference signal resource; The reference signal resources are channel state information reference signal, CSI-RS, resources. Here, the pair of CRis or SSBRis, the CSI-RS and/or SSB means N reference signals are received simultaneously and N is at least 2), and different reference signals in the N reference signals correspond to different remote radio heads (Pg.9: line 4-6, the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and the second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b. Here, the set of reference signal resources means at least one reference signal; therefore, different reference signals correspond to different remote radio heads); or the first measurement result report comprises a plurality of groups, and reference signals in different groups are able to be simultaneously received by the terminal (Due to alternative language “or” in the claims, examiner addresses one limitation only). (Previously Presented) Regarding claims 6 and 17, the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 1 and 12 as outlined above. GUO further teaches wherein, the configuration information comprises a plurality of resource settings, wherein each resource setting comprises two CMR resource sets, and the two CMR resource sets are in a one-to-one correspondence with two remote radio heads, wherein at least one reference signal resource corresponding to a first remote radio head of the two remote radio heads is contained in a first CMR resource set of the two CMR resource sets, and at least one reference signal resource corresponding to a second remote radio head of the two remote radio heads is contained in a second CMR resource set of the two CMR resource sets; or (Due to alternative language “or” in the claims, examiner addresses one limitation only) the configuration information comprises a plurality of resource settings (Pg.8: line 8, The terminal device 100 is configured with two resource settings), wherein each resource setting comprises one resource set (Pg.8: lines 8-11, The first resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources and the second resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources. Here, each of the resource setting comprises one resource set). GUO does not specifically teach wherein each resource setting comprises one CMR resource set, and the one CMR resource set comprises two CMR resource subsets, the two CMR resource subsets are in a one-to-one correspondence with two remote radio heads, wherein at least one reference signal resource corresponding to a first remote radio head of the two remote radio heads is contained in a first CMR resource subset of the two CMR resource subsets, and at least one reference signal resource corresponding to a second remote radio head of the two remote radio heads is contained in a second CMR resource subset of the two CMR resource subsets. However, Matsumura teaches (Title, TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION) wherein each resource setting comprises one CMR resource set ([0134], resource setting for channel measurement, a resource for channel measurement, …, a CMR, and a CMR resource are interchangeably interpreted as each other), and the one CMR resource set comprises two CMR resource subsets, the two CMR resource subsets are in a one-to-one correspondence with two remote radio heads (Fig.20 and [0208], CMRs #0 to #3 correspond to TRP #1, and CMRs #4 to #7 correspond to TRP #2. Here, the CMRs #0 to #3 and the CMRs #4 to #7 are considered as two CMR resource subsets correspond to two TRPs) wherein at least one reference signal resource ([0100], CSI-RS resources for channel measurement (CMR). Here, CMR is reference signal resource) corresponding to a first remote radio head (Fig.20, CMRs #0 to #3 correspond to TRP #1) of the two remote radio heads is contained in a first CMR resource subset of the two CMR resource subsets, and at least one reference signal resource (As mentioned above, CMR is reference signal resource) corresponding to a second remote radio head (Fig.20, CMRs #4 to #7 correspond to TRP #2) of the two remote radio heads is contained in a second CMR resource subset of the two CMR resource subsets ([0208], the CMRs corresponding to TRP #1 is configured first, and the CMRs corresponding to TRP #2 is configured subsequently). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the combination of GUO and Matsumura as mentioned in claims 1 and 12 and further incorporate the teaching of Matsumura. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide measurement and report of CSI for a multi panel/TRP that can be appropriately performed (Matsumura, Abstract and [0001]). (Original) Regarding claims 7 and 18, combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 6 and 17, respectively as outlined above. GUO further teaches receiving/ sending second indication information, wherein the second indication information is used to implement at least one of (Due to alternative language “at least one of” in the claims, examiner addresses one limitation only): activating or deactivating a resource associated with any resource setting; or indicating a resource associated with any resource setting (Pg.8: lines 8-11, The first resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or SS/PBCH blocks for channel measurements and the second resource setting has a set of NZP CSI-RS resources or ZP CSI-RS resources for interference measurement; lines 38-40, The terminal device 100 is configured with one or more NZP CSI-RS resource set configuration(s) as indicated by the higher layer parameters CSI-ResourceConfig, and NZP-CSI-RS-ResourceSet). (Previously Presented) Regarding claims 11 and 22, the combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 1 and 12 as outlined above. GUO does not specifically teach wherein different remote radio heads correspond to a same physical cell identifier (PCI), or different remote radio heads correspond to different PCIs. However, Matsumura teaches wherein different remote radio heads correspond to a same physical cell identifier (PCI), or different remote radio heads correspond to different PCIs ([0077], plurality of TRPs correspond to the same cell identifier (ID), or correspond to different cell IDs. The cell ID is a physical cell ID). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the combination of GUO and Matsumura as mentioned in claims 1 and 12 and further incorporate the teaching of Matsumura. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide measurement and report of CSI for a multi panel/TRP that can be appropriately performed (Matsumura, Abstract and [0001]). Claims 8 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over GUO in view of Matsumura and further in view of Nagata et al. (Nagata hereinafter referred to Nagata) (US 2023/0276287 A1). (Previously Presented) Regarding claims 8 and 19, combination of GUO and Matsumura teaches all the features with respect to claims 6 and 17, respectively as outlined above. GUO further teaches two reference signals in each group are able to be simultaneously received by the terminal (Pg.10: lines 4-6, within each pair of CRis or SSBRis, the CSI-RS and/or synchronization signal block (SSB) resources are received simultaneously by the terminal device 100; Pg.3: line 13-16, The beam report comprises measurement results of each reference signal resource; The reference signal resources are channel state information reference signal, CSI-RS, resources), wherein different reference signals in the two reference signals correspond to different remote radio heads (Pg.9: line 4-6, the first set of reference signal resources from the first network device 200a and the second set of reference signal resources from the second network device 200b. Here, the set of reference signal resources means at least one reference signal; therefore, different reference signals correspond to different remote radio heads); or the measurement result corresponding to each resource setting comprises a plurality of groups, and reference signals in different groups are able to be simultaneously received by the terminal GUO does not specifically teach sending a second measurement result report, wherein the second measurement result report comprises an identifier of at least one resource setting and a measurement result corresponding to each resource setting; wherein, the measurement result corresponding to each resource setting comprises a plurality of groups. However Nagata teaches (Title, TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION) sending a second measurement result report (Fig.5 and [0071], CSI report; [0072], The CSI report includes one or more pairs of the CRI/SSBRI and the RSRP. Here, CSI report is a second measurement result report), wherein the second measurement result report comprises an identifier of at least one resource setting and a measurement result corresponding to each resource setting ([0065], a different number of resource IDs (for example, SSBRIs or CRIs) for beam measurement of a higher layer parameter included in the CSI report configuration information and measurement results corresponding to respective IDs in the beam report; [0066], regarding each report configuration, two different resource IDs for beam measurement and two measurement results corresponding to respective IDs in the beam report); wherein, the measurement result corresponding to each resource setting comprises a plurality of groups ([0066], The UE for which groupBasedBeamReporting is configured), and two reference signals in each group are able to be simultaneously received by the terminal ([0066], the two resources (CSI-RS resources, SSB resources) for beam measurement are simultaneously received by the UE; [0085] Mode 2: The UE simultaneously receives a plurality of beams belonging to the same group ). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified combination of GUO and Matsumura as mentioned in claims 6 and 17 and further incorporate the teaching of Nagata. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide a terminal, a radio communication method, and a base station in next-generation mobile communication systems in which a CSI report related to a group based beam report can be suitably used (Nagata, [0001] and [0009]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROWNAK ISLAM whose telephone number is (571)272-8009. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm (EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached on 571-272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information Regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROWNAK ISLAM/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2474
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695558
CHANNEL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689480
TECHNIQUES FOR INTERPRETING DOWNLINK CONTROL INFORMATION (DCI) FIELDS IN CODEBOOK-BASED MULTI-PANEL DEPLOYMENTS WITH DYNAMIC PANEL SWITCHING
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676666
RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR AN NTN WITH BEAM HOPPING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672016
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CSI-RS CONFIGURATION AND INDICATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666500
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING NETWORK SLICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 454 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month