Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/693,218

MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Examiner
SETZER, NICHOLAS LEE
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
26 granted / 41 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 41 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to the Applicant's communication filed on March 19, 2025. In view of this communication, claims 1-18 are now pending in the application. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Motor Busbar Configuration and Structure. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated IKURA (US 20130113313 A1). Regarding claim 1, IKURA teaches: A motor (Fig 1; 100)comprising: a stator(Fig 1; 20); a rotor (Fig 1; 6)disposed inside the stator(Fig 1; 20)[0033]; a shaft(Fig 1; 9) coupled to the rotor(Fig 1; 6)[0035]; and a bus bar (Fig 1; 30)disposed on the stator(Fig 1; 20)[0033], wherein the bus bar (Fig 4; 30)includes a bus bar holder (Fig 4; 33)and a plurality of terminals(Fig 4; 31U/V/W) disposed on the bus bar holder(Fig 4; 33), each of the terminals (Fig 4; 31U/V/W) includes a body (Fig 4; 31b) disposed in the bus bar holder(Fig 4; 33), an extension part (Fig 4; 32’W) extending inward from the body (Fig 10;31b), and a protrusion part (Fig 4; 32”W)protruding in an axial direction from an end portion of the extension part (Fig 4; 32’W)(the radial portion has been labeled 32’W and the axial portion has been labeled 32”W for ease of understanding), the body (Fig 4; 31W), the extension part (Fig 4; 32’W), and the protrusion part (Fig 4; 32”W)are formed integrally(Shown in Fig 4), the body (Fig 10; 31W)and the extension part (Fig 10; 32’W)of each of the terminals are disposed on the same virtual plane(shown in Fig 10), and the protrusion part (Fig 4; 32”W) of each of the terminals is disposed to be exposed from the bus bar holder(Fig 4; 33) (Shown in Fig 4). PNG media_image1.png 328 437 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 392 389 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 456 403 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 6, IKURA teaches: wherein the protrusion part(Fig 4; 32”W) is disposed to overlap a portion of the extension part (Fig 4; 32’W) in the axial direction(Shown in Fig 4). Claim(s) 17-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated KIM (US 20180123414 A1). Regarding claim 17, IKURA teaches: A motor comprising: a shaft(Fig 8; 30a); a rotor (Fig 8; 300)coupled to the shaft(Fig 8; 30a)[0057]; a stator (Fig 8; 100)disposed to correspond to the rotor (Fig 8; 200)and including a stator core(Fig 1; 110), an insulator coupled to the stator core, and a coil (Fig 1; 120)disposed on the insulator[0057]; and a terminal (Fig 2; 200)electrically connected to the coil(Fig 2; 120)[0042], wherein the terminal (Fig 2; 200)includes a first body part(Fig 4; 210), and a second body part(Fig 7; 231) coupled to the first body part(Fig 4; 210), the second body part (Fig 7; 231)includes a plurality of grooves(Fig 7; 205), the first body part (Fig 7; 210) is coupled to any one of the plurality of grooves(Fig 7; 2205), and the plurality of grooves(Fig 7; 205) have the same shape. PNG media_image4.png 381 452 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 337 382 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 380 417 media_image6.png Greyscale In regards to claim 18, KIM teaches the motor of claim 17: wherein the second body part (Fig 7; 231) includes a terminal body(Fig 7; 231), and terminal parts (Fig 2; 121/122)bent outward at both end portions of the terminal body and in contact with the coil(Fig 7; 120)[0040], the terminal body (Fig 7; 231)includes a pair of protrusions protruding from an upper surface of the terminal body, and the groove (Fig 7; 205)is defined as a space between the pair of protrusions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 2-5 and 7-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over IKURA (US 20130113313 A1) in view of UEDA (US 20080265701 A1). In regards to claim 2, IKURA, teaches the motor of claim 1: IKURA does not teach: wherein the bus bar includes a plurality of bus bar holes formed to pass therethrough in the axial direction, and one area of a coil of the stator is disposed inside the bus bar hole. UEDA teaches: wherein the bus bar (Fig 3; 10) includes a plurality of bus bar holes(Fig 6; 22/23) formed to pass therethrough in the axial direction, and one area of a coil (Fig 6; 20a) of the stator[0037] is disposed inside the bus bar hole(Fig 6; 22). PNG media_image7.png 500 533 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 443 520 media_image8.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify UEDA by adding the bus bar holes and boss parts onto the busbar taught by IKURA in order to connect the coils without using additional materials[0041UEDA]. In regards to claim 3, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 2: IKURA does not teach: wherein each of the plurality of terminals includes the bus bar hole, and the coil comes into contact with the terminal hole. UEDA teaches: wherein each of the plurality of terminals (Fig 3; 13U/V/W) includes the bus bar hole(Fig 3; 22/23), and the coil (Fig 6; 20a)comes into contact with the terminal hole(Fig 6; 22/23). In regards to claim 4, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 3: IKURA does not teach: wherein the terminal includes a boss part extending the terminal hole in the axial direction. UEDA teaches: wherein the terminal(Fig 6; 13U/V/W) includes a boss part (Fig 6; 21) extending the terminal hole (Fig 6; 22/23)in the axial direction. In regards to claim 5, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 4: IKURA does not teach: wherein the boss part is disposed to protrude from an upper surface of the bus bar holder. UEDA teaches: wherein the boss part(Fig 5; 21) is disposed to protrude from an upper surface of the bus bar holder(Fig 6; 15). PNG media_image9.png 661 474 media_image9.png Greyscale In regards to claim 7, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 1: wherein the plurality of terminals(Fig 10; 31U/V/W) include a first terminal(Fig 10; 31U), a second terminal(Fig 10; 31V), and a third terminal (Fig 10; 31W)disposed to be spaced apart from each other(Shown in Fig 10), the first terminal (Fig 11b; 31U) includes an arc-shaped first body(Fig 11; 31b), a first extension part (Fig 11b; 32’U)extending inward from the end portion of the first body(Fig 11b; 31b), a first protrusion part (Fig 11b; 32”U)extending from an end portion of the first extension part (Fig 11b; 32’U)in the axial direction, the second terminal (Fig 11c; 31V)includes an arc-shaped second body(Fig 11c; 31b), a second extension part (Fig 11c; 32’V)extending inward from the end portion of the second body(Fig 11c; 31b), a second protrusion part (Fig 11c; 32”V)extending from an end portion of the second extension part(Fig 11c; 32’V) in the axial direction, the third terminal (Fig 11d; 31W)includes an arc-shaped third body(Fig 11d; 31b), a third extension part (Fig 11d; 32’W)extending inward from the end portion of the third body(Fig 11d; 31b), a third protrusion part (Fig 11d; 32”W)extending from an end portion of the third extension part (Fig 11d; 32’W) in the axial direction. IKURA does not teach: a plurality of first terminal holes formed in the first body, a plurality of second terminal holes formed in the second body, and a plurality of third terminal holes formed in the third body. UEDA teaches: a plurality of first terminal holes (Fig 5; 22/23) formed in the first body(Fig 6; 13U), a plurality of second terminal holes(Fig 5; 22/23) formed in the second body(Fig 5; 13V), and a plurality of third terminal holes (Fig 5; 22/23)formed in the third body(Fig 5; 13W). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify UEDA by adding the bus bar holes and boss parts onto the busbar taught by IKURA in order to connect the coils without using additional materials[0041UEDA]. In regards to claim 8, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 7: wherein the second extension part(Fig 10; 32’V) is disposed between the first extension part(Fig 10; 32’U) and the third extension part (Fig 10; 32’W)with respect to a circumferential direction. In regards to claim 9, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 8: wherein a radial length of the second extension part (Fig 10; 32’V)is smaller than a radial length of the first extension part(Fig 10; 32’U) and larger than a radial length of the third extension part(Fig 10; 32’W)(Fig 10 shows the general length of the second extension part to be between the first and third extension part). In regards to claim 10, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 7: wherein a center of the first protrusion part(Fig 10; 32”U), a center of the second protrusion part(Fig 10; 32”V), and a center of the third protrusion part (Fig 10; 32”W) are disposed on a virtual circle with a predetermined radius with respect to a center of the bus bar(Fig 10 shows the general geometric shape to generally fit this limitation limitation). In regards to claim 11, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 9: wherein an angle formed by a center (C1) of the first protrusion part (Fig 10; 32”U)and a center of the second protrusion part (Fig 10; 32”V)with respect to a center (C) of the bus bar is the same as an angle formed by the center of the second protrusion part (Fig 10; 32”V)and a center of the third protrusion part(Fig 10; 32”W) (Fig 10 shows the general geometric shape to generally fit this limitation limitation). In regards to claim 12, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 7. IKURA does not teach: wherein the bus bar includes a plurality of bus bar holes formed to pass therethrough in the axial direction, the first terminal hole forms a portion of any one of the plurality of bus bar holes, the second terminal hole forms a portion of another one of the plurality of bus bar holes, and the third terminal hole forms a portion of the remaining one of the plurality of bus bar holes. UEDA teaches: wherein the bus bar (Fig 3; 10) includes a plurality of bus bar holes(Fig 3; 16) formed to pass therethrough in the axial direction, the first terminal hole (Fig 6; 22/23) forms a portion of any one of the plurality of bus bar holes(Fig 3; 16), the second terminal hole (Fig 6; 22/23)forms a portion of another one of the plurality of bus bar holes(Fig 3; 16), and the third terminal hole (Fig 6; 22/23)forms a portion of the remaining one of the plurality of bus bar holes(Fig 3; 16). In regards to claim 13, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 7. IKURA does not teach: wherein one of the plurality of first terminal holes is disposed to overlap the second extension part of the second terminal in the radial direction. UEDA teaches: wherein one of the plurality of first terminal holes (Fig 6; 22/23) is disposed to overlap the second extension part(Fig 3; 11V) of the second terminal in the radial direction. The Applicant should note that combination UEDA/IKURA discloses the claimed invention except for, “ a first terminal hole is disposed to overlap the second extension part in the radial direction.” It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have a first terminal hole overlap the second extension part in the radial direction, since it has been held that rearranging parts of an invention involves only routine skill in the art. In re Japikse, 86 USPQ 70. In regards to claim 14, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 13. IKURA does not teach: wherein another one of the plurality of first terminal holes is disposed on the end portion of the first body in the circumferential direction. UEDA teaches: wherein another one of the plurality of first terminal holes (Fig 6; 22/23) is disposed on the end portion of the first body (Fig 3; 13U) in the circumferential direction( since the body is circular shaped the end portion can be defined at any point along the body). In regards to claim 15, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 7. IKURA does not teach: wherein the first terminal includes a first boss part extending the first terminal hole in the axial direction. UEDA teaches: wherein the first terminal (Fig 3; 11U/13U) includes a first boss part (Fig 6; 21) extending the first terminal hole (Fig 6; 22/23) in the axial direction. In regards to claim 16, IKURA, in view of UEDA, teaches the motor of claim 7. IKURA does not teach: wherein the first terminal hole does not overlap the second terminal hole or the third terminal hole with respect to the radial direction. UEDA teaches: wherein the first terminal hole(Fig 3; 16) does not overlap the second terminal hole(Fig 3; 16) or the third terminal hole (Fig 3; 16)with respect to the radial direction(Fig 2 shows this limitation). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICHOLAS L SETZER whose telephone number is (571)272-3021. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.L.S./Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589880
ROTOR, AND PROPELLER DRIVING DEVICE AND AIRCRAFT USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592605
COOLING SYSTEM FOR DRIVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580436
STATOR ASSEMBLY FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573895
ROTOR PUNCHING SHEET, MOTOR ROTOR, MOTOR AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558707
TRANSDUCER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+50.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 41 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month