Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/693,466

VIDEO DECODING APPARATUS AND VIDEO CODING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Priority
Sep 24, 2021 — JP 2021-155022 +2 more
Examiner
ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
786 granted / 1049 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1096
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1049 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed August 21, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant has updated the office action to reflect that candidate lists are derived by the processed described in claim 1 (¶ 128). Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 5, and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sim et al (US 2022/0279187, hereafter Sim). As per claim 1, Sim discloses a video decoding apparatus, comprising: a matrix reference pixel derivation unit circuit configured to derive, as a reference image, an image obtained by downsampling an image adjacent to a top side and a left side of a target block (¶ 77 and 80); a mode derivation unit circuit configured to derive a candidate list of prediction modes used for a target block according to the reference image and a size of the target block (¶ 74 - 77); a prediction processing parameter derivation unit circuit configured to derive a prediction processing parameter used to derive a prediction image according to the candidate list, a matrix intra prediction mode indicator, and the size of the target block (¶ 74 – 77; the derived prediction processing parameter is MipSizeId and ¶ 128; For example, the number of available MIP modes may vary with the size of a block to which MIP is applied, and therefore a separate candidate MIP mode list may be managed for each MipSizeId={0, 1, 2}.); a matrix prediction image derivation unit circuit configured to derive a prediction image based on an element of the reference image and the prediction processing parameter; and a matrix prediction image interpolation unit circuit configured to derive the prediction image or an image obtained by interpolating the prediction image as a prediction image, wherein the mode derivation unit circuit derives a candidate list having the number of elements equal to or less than half the total number of prediction modes defined for the size of the target block (¶ 74 – 77), and wherein the mode derivation circuit derives the candidate list based on (1) a feature value derived from pixel values included in the reference image by using an arithmetic operation of any one of an average, a difference, and an absolute value, or (2) a magnitude relationship between the feature value and a threshold (¶ 77 – 80 and 128). As per claim 4, Sim discloses the video decoding apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mode derivation unit circuit derives the candidate list by using a prediction mode or a quantization parameter of a neighboring block (¶ 95). Regarding claim 5, arguments analogous to those presented for claim 1 are applicable for claim 5. Regarding claim 12, arguments analogous to those presented for claim 1 are applicable for claim 12. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 13 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHIKAODILI E ANYIKIRE whose telephone number is (571)270-1445. The examiner can normally be reached 8 am - 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Czekaj can be reached at 571-272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHIKAODILI E ANYIKIRE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 21, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636116
ROBOTIC SURGICAL NAVIGATION USING A PROPRIOCEPTIVE DIGITAL SURGICAL STEREOSCOPIC CAMERA SYSTEM
4y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641224
Intra-Prediction on Non-dyadic Blocks
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632029
A METHOD OF MONITORING INDUSTRIAL PROCESSING PROCESSES, CORRESPONDING APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634436
VIDEO ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS ADJUSTING NUMBER OF MULTIPLE TRANSFORM SELECTION CANDIDATES IN MULTIPLE TRANSFORM SELECTION
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12621440
ENCODING APPARATUS, IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+11.5%)
3y 2m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1049 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month