Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/694,299

AIR HOSE

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Mar 21, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2021 — GB 2113838.3 +1 more
Examiner
DEAL, DAVID R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
470 granted / 563 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
577
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting Claims 1-14 of this application is patentably indistinct from claims 1-14 of Application No. 18/243,428. Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(f), when two or more applications filed by the same applicant or assignee contain patentably indistinct claims, elimination of such claims from all but one application may be required in the absence of good and sufficient reason for their retention during pendency in more than one application. Applicant is required to either cancel the patentably indistinct claims from all but one application or maintain a clear line of demarcation between the applications. See MPEP § 822. A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-14 are provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-14 of copending Application No. 18/243,428 (reference application). This is a provisional statutory double patenting rejection since the claims directed to the same invention have not in fact been patented. The claims of the instant application recite the same structure with the same function as the claims of the co-pending application. While the co-pending application does not use the exact same claim language, the differences are non-semantic as the disclosure provides no support for a different interpretation of the claims of the instant application that would not also be described by the claims of the co-pending application. The co-pending applications claim the same invention as defined under 35 U.S.C. 101. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. USPN 2014/0230945 A1 is useful for reference to the specification by number and discloses an axially collapsible/extendable hose. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID R DEAL whose telephone number is (469)295-9216. The examiner can normally be reached M-F generally 8-4 pm CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisors can be reached at: Craig M Schneider (571) 272-3607 and Ken Rinehart (571( 272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID R DEAL/Primary Examiner Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746695
BENDING STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747821
HIGH TEMPERATURE RESISTANT, JACKETED FOREIGN MATERIAL EXCLUSION DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729799
STENT SPRINGS FOR REPAIRING PIPES
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723682
PIPE FOR TRANSPORTING A FLUID, INSULATED PIPE WITH SUCH, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PIPE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716541
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TEMPORARY SEALING OF FLANGE LEAKS ON INDUSTRIAL PIPELINES
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month