Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/694,446

ELECTRIC DYNAMIC POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Priority
Sep 23, 2021 — provisional 63/261,513 +1 more
Examiner
DUDA, RINA I
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ftex Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
814 granted / 1011 resolved
+12.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1037
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
37.7%
-2.3% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1011 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to because the empty boxes need to be textually labeled (37 CFR 1.84(o)). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-11, 13-16, 21-23, 25, and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen et al (US Patent 10500966) and Ukegawa et al (US Patent 9653999). Claim 1, Chen et al a drivetrain for an electric vehicle battery electric vehicle BEV 112, the drivetrain comprises: a DC-DC voltage converter 152, electrically connected to an energy source 124, comprising at least one single arm switching power converter that includes a half-bridge (switches 206/208 connected in series), an inductor 214 electrically connected to the half-bridge, and at least one capacitor 204 connected in parallel to the inductor (see fig. 2), and a driver (see col. 6 lines 33-37); a DC-DC controller 200, connected to the driver (see col. 7 lines 20-26), configured to receive an indication of required output power (col. 5 lines 39-43), an indication of input DC signal (see fig. 2, inputs to controller 200 include the input voltage), generate a PWM signal, and transmit the generated PWM signal to the driver (see for example col. 6 lines 37-40 and col. 7 lines 16-49), wherein the driver is configured to receive the PWM signal from controller 200 and transmit the control signal to the half-bridge causing the converter to boost or convert the input DC signal from the battery into a DC signal having the required power output; and a DC-AC inverter 126 (see the description of fig. 3), connected to the DC-DC converter 152 and electric motor 114, for receiving the indication of required output power and convert the DC signal outputted by DC-DC converter into an AC signal. Chen et al does not teach a DC-DC power converter having the half-bridge in thermal contact with a cooling system comprising a heat spreader. However, Ukegawa et al teaches a power supply apparatus for an electric motor 40 comprising at least a DC-DC power converter 20 connected between a battery 10 and an inverter 30, wherein the power converter includes at least one half-bridge having a switching element Q22 and Q24 connected in series, an inductor L1, and a capacitor C1 or C2, the switching elements are installed as a chip on a substrate 90, the substrate may be a heat spreader ( a copper block or Direct Brazed Aluminum), see for example the description given in col. 14 lines 19-29. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to have a DC-DC converter in thermal contact with a cooling system such as the heat spreader described by Ukegawa et al, since copper or aluminum heat spreaders absorb heat from the switching devices and spread said absorbed heat over a bigger area, this helps prevent component damage and lowers operating temperature or potential overcurrent (see col. 1 lines 43-46 where Ukegawa et al describes controlling power to the load in case of short circuit which creates problems with overcurrent). Claim 2, Chen et al describes the indication of the required inverter output comprises a required speed or torque (see for example the description of fig. 5, where a required speed and required torque is selected to accomplished a required output power. Claim 3, Chen et al teaches a DC bus (represented by the voltage across capacitor 202) connected between an energy source 124 and the half-bridge (represented switching elements 206/208); a second DC bus represented voltage across capacitor 204 which represents the output of the DC-DC converter; and an AC bus (represented by the output of inverter 126) connected to the motor 114. Claim 4, Chen et al teaches DC-DC controller 200 receiving input parameters such as VBAT/VDC (see fig. 2). Claim 5, as described above in the rejection of claim 1, Chen et al describes a half-bridge represented by switching elements 206/208 and a driver for controlling the gate terminal of said switching elements using PWM. Additionally, Chen et al teaches a DC-AC controller 310 and an inverter 126 including a plurality of half-bridges, wherein the controller 310 operates a plurality of switching elements 302A-302F in the inverter using a series of inputs. Claims 6 and 7, as described by Chen et al in fig. 2 and corresponding description, the DC-DC controller 200 receives various voltage feedback signals from the plurality of DC buses and controls the switching elements 206/208 of the DC-DC converter using PWM signals generated based on the feedback information. Claim 8, Chen et al describes in fig. 3 and corresponding description a controller for sensing output power sensor using current feedback and output voltage to determine if the inverter is providing motor 114 with a required power (as described in col. 5 lines 39-43). Claims 9-10, Chen et al describes a first half-bridge comprising high-side transistor 206 and low side transistor 208, wherein DC-DC controller 200 selectively operates the transistors (see col. 7 lines 26-49). Claim 11, Chen et al describes inductor 214 and capacitor 202 for smoothing an input current and an input voltage (see the description on the capacitor and inductor in fig. 2). Claim 13, Chen et al describes transistors 206/208 as IGBT or FET transistors (see col. 6 lines 33-37). Claim 14, Chen et al describes in col. 6 lines 33-36 that switching devices 206 and 208 can be any type of controllable switches. Claims 15-16, Ukegawa teaches DC-DC converter 20 having switches Q22 and Q24 cooled by the heat spreader (see col. 14 lines 19-29) of a substrate 90 which also dissipates heat. Claims 21 and 23, the number of half-bridges in the DC-DC power converter depends on the required power level, input/output voltage, and application of the power converter. Claim 22, Chen et al describes in fig. 3 and corresponding description, an inverter 126 having a plurality of half-bridges according to the number of phases of motor 114. Claim 25, Chen et al describes a DC-DC converter 152 configured to operate at various frequencies, the specific frequency range is considered a design choice and is not given any patentable weight. Claim 27, both Chen et al and Ukegawa et al describe a power converter comprising a plurality of capacitors see for example Chen et al (fig. 2) and Ukegawa et al (fig. 1). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The documents cited in the attached PTO-892 describe other variable voltage variable frequency power converters used to provide power to electric motors, wherein the power converters comprise DC-DC converters for boosting an input voltage from a DC voltage supply such as battery and a DC-AC inverter for converting a DC voltage outputted by the DC-DC converter into an AC voltage outputted to a motor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rina I Duda whose telephone number is (571)272-2062. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at (571) 272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RINA I DUDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12692122
AUTONOMOUS HUMAN-MACHINE-INTERFACE IN THE FORM OF A LANDING OPERATION PANEL OR A LANDING INFORMATION PANEL FOR AN ELEVATOR INSTALLATION
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692125
SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A LOCATION OF A PERSON IN A HOISTWAY
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686591
INTERFACE FOR OPERATING AN ELEVATOR CAR, ELEVATOR CAR AND METHOD OF PRODUCING AN ELEVATOR CAR
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679698
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING ELEVATOR SAFETY CHAIN
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676566
CONTROLLER CIRCUIT OF MOTOR AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1011 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month