Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/694,775

HORN APERTURE FOR A SIMPLIFIED mmWAVE PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Examiner
KIM, SEOKJIN
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Jabil Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
418 granted / 540 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
571
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 540 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/22/2024 and 02/06/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Woolrich (US 2020/0067199 A1) in view of Seler (US 2016/0043455 A1). Regarding claim 1, Woolrich teaches an antenna comprising: a printed circuit board (PCB) structure (Figs. 1A, 1B, [0030] printed circuit board 110) at least one beamforming integrated circuit (IC) ([0036] transmitter 198, receiver 199); and at least one horn antenna radiating element (Fig. 5, [0044] horn antenna array 503) formed on the PCB structure (110), wherein the at least one horn antenna radiating element includes a feed structure formed in the PCB layer (Figs. 9A-9C, [0041] launchers 610, 611, 612) and a horn aperture extending from the feed structure outside of the PCB layer (Fig. 9, 230, 240). However, Woolrich does not explicitly teach the antenna, wherein: the PCB structure includes a plurality of prepreg buildup layers; and the at least one beamforming integrated circuit (IC) is formed on one side the PCB structure. Seler teaches an antenna wherein: a PCB structure includes a plurality of prepreg buildup layers ([0037] prepreg materials are typically used to manufacture PCBs); and at least one beamforming integrated circuit (IC) is formed on one side the PCB structure (Fig. 6, 10, [0044] a semiconductor package 10 configured to transmit a microwave waveguide signal). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to apply the teachings of Seler to the teachings of Woolrich as it is typical (Woolrich, [0037] prepreg materials are typically used to manufacture PCBs). Regarding claim 2, all the limitations of claim 1 are taught by Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich in view of Seler further teaches the antenna, wherein the horn aperture is formed in a metal layer (Woolrich [0038] a waveguide horn element, Seler [0047] waveguide part 60, metallization for microwave transmission). Regarding claim 3, all the limitations of claim 1 are taught by Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich further teaches the antenna, wherein the horn aperture is tapered (Fig. 9A, 120). Regarding claim 4, all the limitations of claim 1 are taught by Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich further teaches the antenna, wherein the horn aperture includes opposing ridges extending into an aperture waveguide (Fig. 9A, [0040] 400). Regarding claim 6, all the limitations of claim 1 are taught by Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich further teaches the antenna, wherein the antenna is a phased array antenna ([0002] phased array antennas), the at least one beamforming IC is a plurality of beamforming ICs (Fig. 1, 198, 199) and the at least one horn radiating element is a plurality of horn radiating elements (Fig. 9A). Regarding claim 8, this claim has substantially the same subject matter as that in claim 2. Therefore, claim 8 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 2 above. Regarding claim 9, this claim has substantially the same subject matter as that in claim 3. Therefore, claim 9 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 3 above. Regarding claim 10, this claim has substantially the same subject matter as that in claim 4. Therefore, claim 10 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 4 above. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Woolrich (US 2020/0067199 A1) in view of Seler (US 2016/0043455 A1) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Hunziker (US 2020/0067198 A1). Regarding claim 5, all the limitations of claim 1 are taught by Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich in view of Seler does not explicitly teach the antenna, wherein the prepreg buildup layers include microvias. Hunziker teaches an antenna comprising a printed circuit board made of prepreg buildup layers including vias ([0077], [0078]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to apply the teachings of Hunziker to the teachings of Woolrich in view of Seler as the forming vias as through-hole connection is a desired way to connect conductive layers through laminate as taught by Hunziker (Hunziker, [0078]). Claims 7 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Woolrich (US 2020/0067199 A1) in view of Seler (US 2016/0043455 A1) as applied to claim 6 above, and further in view of Shams (US 2021/0296764 A1). Regarding claim 7, all the limitations of claim 6 are taught by Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich in view of Seler. Woolrich in view of Seler does not explicitly teach the antenna, wherein the antenna is part of a 5G radio. Shams teaches a phased array horn antenna ([0129]), wherein the antenna is part of a 5G radio ([0045], [0127]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to apply the teachings of Woolrich in view of Seler to implement Shams’s phase array horn antenna in order for high density phased array without increasing the cost (Woolrich, [0002]). Regarding claim 11, this claim has substantially the same subject matter as that in claim 7. Therefore, claim 11 is rejected under the same rationale as claim 7 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEOKJIN KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-1487. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander H. Taningco can be reached at 571-272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEOKJIN KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597712
TRANSMISSION LINE ARRANGEMENT FOR A PASSIVE COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592476
CIRCUIT BOARD FOR ANTENNA, ANTENNA PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME AND IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592494
RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE, RIS, WITH SENSING CAPABILITIES AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586901
WIDEBAND ANTENNA ARRANGED ON VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573756
Electronic Devices with Probe-Fed Dielectric Resonator Antennas
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 540 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month