Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/694,946

BUCKLE ASSEMBLY, PRESSING AND CUTTING JIG, AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING PACKAGE STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Examiner
GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Boe Technology Group Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
240 granted / 348 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
392
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 348 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Detailed Office Action The communication dated 3/22/2024 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 1-20 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings Figures 1a and 1b should be designated by a legend such as --Prior Art-- because only that which is old is illustrated. See MPEP § 608.02(g). Corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The replacement sheet(s) should be labeled “Replacement Sheet” in the page header (as per 37 CFR 1.84(c)) so as not to obstruct any portion of the drawing figures. If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10 and 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation of “a support” in line 2. Claim 1 recites the limitation of “one support” in line 2. Therefore, it is not clear that the limitation in claim 10 is the same as the limitation in claim 1 or a different support. For the purpose of examination, the Examiner interprets both as the same support. Claim 13 recites the limitation of “a support” in line 2. Claim 1 recites the limitation of “one support” in line 2. Note that claim 13 depends on claim 11 that depends on claim 1. Therefore, it is not clear that the limitation in claim 13 is the same as the limitation in claim 1 or a different support. For the purpose of examination, the Examiner interprets both as the same support. Claim 14 recites the limitations "the buckle assembly" in line 13 and “the housing in line 13/14. There are insufficient antecedent bases for these limitations in the claim. Claims 15-20 are dependent on claim 14 and are rejected as well Claim 15 recites the limitation of “a support” in line 2. Claim 1 recites the limitation of “one support” in line 2. Note that claim 15 depends on claim 14 that depends on claim 1. Therefore, it is not clear that the limitation in claim 15 is the same as the limitation in claim 1 or a different support. For the purpose of examination, the Examiner interprets both as the same support. Claim 20 recites the limitations of “a female jig core” in line 4, “a male jig core” in line 4, and “an internal cavity” in line 5. Claim 14 already recites these limitations. Note that claim 20 depends on claim 19 that depends on claim 14. Therefore, it is not clear that the aforementioned limitations in claim 20 are the same as those limitations in claim 14 or different ones. For the purpose of examination, the Examiner interprets them as the same. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 11-12 are allowed. The closest prior art to the independent claim 1 was WANG (CN-105682395-A, of record, English translation provided by the Examiner), hereinafter WANG. WANG discloses a buckle assembly, comprising a plurality of buckle structures, one plastic frame structure; wherein an outer contour of the plastic frame structure is matched with an outer contour of a housing of an electronic product; the plastic frame structure is provided with a plurality of openings, and each buckle structure is embedded into one of the openings {[FIG. 2] 23 is the frame of an electronic device or a mobile phone and 4 are the plurality of buckle structures that are embedded in the openings of the frame 23}. WANG, however, fails to disclose that the buckle assembly comprises of one support, and that the support is disposed in an annular area defined by the plastic frame structure; the support is divided into a plurality of branches each having a first end and a second end, first ends of different branches are connected, while the second end of each branch is connected to one of the buckle structures; and the plurality of buckle structures, the plastic frame structure and the support form an integral structure by injection molding. These additional structures are not obvious modifications to the buckle assembly of WANG. Claims 2-9 and 11-12 are dependent on claim 1 and are allowed as well. Claims 10 and 13-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to S. BEHROOZ GHORISHI whose telephone number is (571)272-1373. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-(alt Fri) 7:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abbas Rashid can be reached at 571-270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S. BEHROOZ GHORISHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 29, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583161
INJECTION MOLDING METHOD AND INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568763
METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558828
INJECTION MOLDING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552112
AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544970
LINK MECHANISM, LINK DEVICE, AND STRETCHING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 348 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month