Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/695,343

LIDAR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 25, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2021 — DE 10 2021 125 131.1 +1 more
Examiner
BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ams-Osram Lnternational GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
772 granted / 995 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
1069
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 995 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 14, 20 and claims bellow are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1 US 20210116531 A1 . 20. (New) A lidar system for surroundings detection, comprising an emitter for radiation emission and a detector for radiation detection, wherein the emitter comprises a plurality of separately controllable light sources[0003, 0038]+[0097](one or more transmit antennas) for emitting light radiation, [0003, 0038](transmit antennas can be light sources from lidar[0038]) wherein the lidar system is configured to operate the emitter in such a way that joint radiation operation is performed in each case successively by different light source groups comprising a plurality of light sources,[0111-0114] wherein the joint radiation operation comprises a continuous operating mode [0112](FMCW wherein in the continuous operating mode the light sources of the respective light source group emit differently modulated light radiations with different modulation frequencies, and(implicit definition of FMCW) wherein the detector is realized in the form of a single detector comprising only one radiation- sensitive detector structure[0149](one receive antenna) Claim 2, 3, 15 [0146] Claims 4 [0124] (low pass filtering at least before phase information) 13. (Currently Amended) The lidar system according toclaim 1,wherein the lidar system is configured to operate the emitter in such a way that joint radiation operation is performed in each case successively by different light source groups comprising a plurality of light sources, wherein the joint radiation operation comprises a continuous operating mode frequencies, [0112](FMCW implicit definition of FMCW) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-9, 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 in view of D2 EP 3070494 A1. Although D1 does not teach that FMCW was generated by the light source group (115) comprises a pulsed operating mode, in which the light sources of the light source group emit light radiations (130) in the form of at least one common pulse. D2 teaches using two mode operation pulsed and continuous (fig. 4 P(WFD) and P(Phi))[0061-0067] It will be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art to modify teachings taught by D1 with teachings by D2 in order to obtain in measure short and long distances. Claim 6, 17 D2[0062] Claims 7, 8, 9, 18 D2[0062] It will be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art to modify teachings taught by D1 with teachings by D2 in order to obtain in measure short and long distances without saturation of the detector. Claim(s) 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1. Although regarding claims 10-13-19 D1 does not explicitly teach 10. (Currently Amended) The lidar system according claim 1,wherein the light sources are configured in the form of surface emitters. (Obvious matter of design choice to use one of many well known source arrays) 11. (Currently Amended) The lidar system according toclaim 1,wherein the detector comprises one of the following: a single photodiode,or a single avalanche photodiode. . (Obvious matter of design choice to use one of many well known source detector types) 12. (Currently Amended) The lidar system according toclaim 1,wherein the modulation frequencies are in the MHz range. (obvious matter of choice of the operation ranges) It will be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art to modify teachings taught by D1as it is just matter either design choice or choosing operation range. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over D1 in view of D3 US 20210048531 A1. Regarding claim 19 D1 does not teach but D3 teaches 19. (New) The lidar system according to claim 13, wherein in the continuous operating mode the same different modulation frequencies are employed in each case for the different light source groups.[0050](fig. 4) It will be obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art to modify teachings taught by D1 with teachings by D3 in order to perform spatial modulation and to collect the phase-synchronized signals I.sub.0, I.sub.90, I.sub.180 and I.sub.270, for the purpose of computing the depth coordinates. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOVHANNES BAGHDASARYAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7845. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuqing Xiao can be reached at (571) 270-3603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOVHANNES BAGHDASARYAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693394
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING DISTANCE AND/OR VELOCITY OF OBJECT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12681151
LIDAR SENSOR SYSTEM
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681318
Optical Component and Laser Radar System
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674872
LIDAR SENSOR THAT MINIMIZES NOISE LIGHT WHEN TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING LIGHT
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669586
TWO-CHANNEL LIDAR SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 0m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 995 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month