Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/695,547

SECONDARY BATTERY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — JP 2021-162287 +1 more
Examiner
MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
632 granted / 941 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
987
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
47.2%
+7.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 941 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites “…consisting of alkali metal elements and Group 2” which renders the claim vague and indefinite because the claim fails to define what is the definition and the scope of “Group 2”. Clarification is required. Claim 10 recites the limitation of “the mass of the silicon-containing material” in 3rd line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because prior to the cited limitation, claim fails to define “a mass of the silicon-containing material” prior to the citation. Claim 10 recites the limitation of “the sum of the mass of the carbon material” in 3rd line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because prior to the cited limitation, claim fails to define “a sum of the mass of the carbon material” prior to the citation. Claim 10 recites the limitation of “the mass of the carbon material” in 4th line. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim because prior to the cited limitation, claim fails to define “a mass of the carbon material” prior to the citation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) / (a)(2) as being anticipated by Hoshi et al. (WO 2019/220576), the prior art submitted by applicant. Examiner’s note: the following prior art rejection relies on the attached English translation of the above cited reference for the provided citations. As to claim 1, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) disclose a secondary battery (a lithium-ion secondary battery, ¶ [0158] - ¶ [0159]) comprising: - a positive electrode (¶ [0159]); - a negative electrode (¶ [0159]) containing a negative electrode active material, wherein the negative electrode active material contains a carbon material and a silicon-containing material (lithium-ion secondary battery negative electrode material comprises particles A containing silicon, and particles B and C containing a carbonaceous material, see ¶ [0331]), - an average particle diameter of the silicon-containing material is smaller than an average particle diameter of the carbon material, and - an average circularity of the silicon-containing material is smaller than an average circularity of the carbon material (see ¶ [0295] - ¶ [0296] and ¶ [0320] - ¶ [0334]). The average particle diameter of the carbon material is in a range of 10 to 30 µm, and the average particle diameter of the silicon-containing material is in a range of 1 to 15 µm (see ¶ [0319] - ¶ [0325]) wherein the carbon material contains at least one selected from the group consisting of graphite, soft carbon, and hard carbon (see ¶ [0068]), wherein, in the negative electrode, the mass of the silicon-containing material is in a range of 5% to 30% of the sum of the mass of the carbon material and the mass of the carbon material and the mass of the silicon-containing material (see ¶ [0295] - ¶ [0296]). As to claim 2, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) teach the average circularity of the carbon material is 0.7 or more, and the average circularity of the silicon-containing material is 0.6 or less. (see ¶ [0320] - ¶ [0334]) As to claim 3, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) disclose the average particle diameter of the carbon material is in a range of 10 to 30 μm, and the average particle diameter of the silicon-containing material is in a range of 1 to 15 μm. (see ¶ [0320] - ¶ [0334]) As to claim 4, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) teach the carbon material contains at least one selected from the group consisting of graphite, soft carbon, and hard carbon. (see ¶ [0068]) As to claim 5, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) disclose the silicon-containing material is composite particles that include an ion-conducting phase and silicon phases dispersed in the ion-conducting phase. (see ¶ [0017]) As to claim 6, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) teach the silicon-containing material contains the composite particles, and a coating layer covering at least a portion of surfaces of the composite particles. (see ¶ [0155]) As to claim 7, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) disclose the ion-conducting phase is at least one selected from the group consisting of a silicate phase, a carbon phase, and a silicon oxide phase. (see ¶ [0155] and ¶ [0330] - ¶ [0331]) As to claim 8, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) teach the silicate phase contains at least one selected from the group consisting of alkali metal elements and Group 2 elements. (see ¶ [0160] - ¶ [0161]) As to claim 9, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) disclose the silicate phase contains at least one selected from the group consisting of B, Al, Zr, Nb, Ta, V, lanthanoids, Y, Ti, P, Bi, Zn, Sn, Pb, Sb, Co, Er, F, and W. (see ¶ [0154] and ¶ [0160]) As to claim 10, Hoshi et al. (WO ‘576) teach in the negative electrode, the mass of the silicon-containing material is in a range of 5% to 30% of the sum of the mass of the carbon material and the mass of the silicon-containing material. (see ¶ [0295] - ¶ [0296]) Correspondence Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEYED MASOUD MALEKZADEH whose telephone number is (571)272-6215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SUSAN D. LEONG can be reached at (571)270-1487. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEYED MASOUD MALEKZADEH/Primary Examiner Art Unit 1754 07/21/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703136
METHOD AND EXTRUSION DIE FOR MAKING A STRUCTURING FABRIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703131
Expanded Polymer Pellets
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686952
ELECTROSPINNING ALIGNMENT APPARATUS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686165
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING APPARATUS WITH POWDER-INTEGRATED PRECERAMIC MIXTURE AND RELATED METHODS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679024
DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRINTING THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS
5y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.8%)
3y 3m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 941 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month