Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/695,750

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VENDING MACHINE PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION AND CALIBRATION

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
Oct 26, 2021 — provisional 63/263,073 +1 more
Examiner
OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Crane Payment Innovations Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
97 granted / 107 resolved
+38.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
125
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
72.8%
+32.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 107 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant argues that the prior art of record does not teach and/or suggest the limitations of newly amended independent claims 1 and 11. In response, the Examiner respectfully disagree with the Applicant. Applicant’s argument regarding claim 1 pertain to the following limitation “wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform.” The rejection of claim 1 has been restated herein with detailed embedded statements regarding the rejection: Lu does not disclose wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform. Hieb discloses wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform (30) to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position; furthermore, vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb that possess an X-Y rail assembly, once the sensor detects the rail assembly is not in its home position, the vending machine initiates an auto-recovery or re-homing sequence; such feature is rather typical of vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb, hence the reason why the sensor checks whether the rail assembly is in the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform. in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Furthermore, the applicant’s argument regarding claim 11 pertain to the following limitation “wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position.” The rejection of claim 11 has been restated herein with detailed embedded statements regarding the rejection: Lu does not disclose wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position. Hieb discloses wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform (30) to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position; furthermore, vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb that possess an X-Y rail assembly, once the sensor detects the rail assembly is not in its home position, the vending machine initiates an auto-recovery or re-homing sequence; such feature is rather typical of vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb, hence the reason why the sensor checks whether the rail assembly is in the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-17,19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites “wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position.” This limitation is rather unclear since the latter portion of the claim that is not underlined repeated the earlier portion of the claim that is underlined. Clarification of the claim is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5,7,9-15,17,19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lu (US 2013/0134178) in view of Hieb et al. (US 2008/0135574). Claim 1, Lu discloses a system comprising: a vending machine (fig.1) including a product delivery platform (40) operable to retrieve products from a shelf (12) and deposit products into an access port (24) for retrieval; an image capture device (44) operable to capture at least one image of an interior compartment of the vending machine; and a vending machine controller (50) coupled to at least one memory (52), wherein the vending machine controller is configured to receive, based on an image analysis of the at least one image, one or more instructions to update the at least one memory (fig.5; the memory inherently is updated). Lu does not disclose wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform. Hieb discloses wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform (30) to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position; furthermore, vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb that possess an X-Y rail assembly, once the sensor detects the rail assembly is not in its home position, the vending machine initiates an auto-recovery or re-homing sequence; such feature is rather typical of vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb, hence the reason why the sensor checks whether the rail assembly is in the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform. in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim 2, Lu discloses wherein the image capture device (44) is mounted on the product delivery platform (40). Claim 3, Lu discloses wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update product information of one or more products stored in the vending machine (para.0039). Claim 4, Lu discloses wherein the instruction to update the product information of the one or more products is received in response to the image analysis of the at least one image indicating a change in product placement in the vending machine for at least one product of the one or more products (para.0039-0042; the change in placement of products inherently would be updated for the product locations). Claim 5, Lu does not disclose a plurality of product gates disposed on the shelf of the vending machine, and wherein the product information includes dispensing parameters for at least one of the plurality of product gates associated with the at least one product. Hieb discloses a plurality of product gates (135) disposed on the shelf (120) of the vending machine, and wherein the product information (137) includes dispensing parameters for at least one of the plurality of product gates associated with the at least one product (para.0172). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with a plurality of product gates disposed on the shelf of the vending machine, and wherein the product information includes dispensing parameters for at least one of the plurality of product gates associated with the at least one product in order to further enhance the efficiency of the dispenser. Claim 7, Lu does not disclose wherein the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform is received in response to the image analysis of the at least one image indicating an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform. Hieb discloses wherein the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform (30) is received in response to an offset of the product delivery platform (30) from a home position of the product delivery platform (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform is received in response to the image analysis of the at least one image indicating an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim 9, Lu does not disclose wherein the home position of the product delivery platform is determined based on the image analysis of the at least one image indicating a change in position of the product delivery platform in relation to other objects in the vending machine. Hieb does not disclose wherein the home position of the product delivery platform (30) is determined based on a change in position of the product delivery platform (30) in relation to other objects in the vending machine (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position in relation to other objects in the vending machine inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the home position of the product delivery platform is determined based on the image analysis of the at least one image indicating a change in position of the product delivery platform in relation to other objects in the vending machine in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim 10, Lu discloses the image capture device (44) is configured to transmit the at least one image to a remote device (54) configured to perform the image analysis (figs.10-12); and the vending machine controller (50) is configured to receive the one or more instructions to update the at least one memory from the remote device (54; since the product location data is stored in the database, the database inherently provides information for the controller to update memory and other functions). Claim 11, Lu discloses a method comprising: capturing, by an image capture device (44), at least one image of an interior compartment of a vending machine, the vending machine including a product delivery platform (40) that retrieves products from a shelf (12) and deposits products into an access port (24) for retrieval; and receiving, by a vending machine controller (50) coupled to at least one memory (52), one or more instructions to update the at least one memory based on an image analysis of the at least one image (fig.5; the memory inherently is updated). Lu does not disclose wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position. Hieb discloses wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform (30) to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position; furthermore, vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb that possess an X-Y rail assembly, once the sensor detects the rail assembly is not in its home position, the vending machine initiates an auto-recovery or re-homing sequence; such feature is rather typical of vending machines such as those disclosed by Hieb, hence the reason why the sensor checks whether the rail assembly is in the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update a vertical calibration or a horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform; and providing the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform to correct the offset from the home position in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim 12, Lu discloses wherein the image capture device (44) is mounted on the product delivery platform (40). Claim 13, Lu discloses wherein the one or more instructions include an instruction to update product information of one or more products stored in the vending machine (para.0039). Claim 14, Lu discloses receiving the instruction to update the product information of the one or more products in response to the image analysis of the at least one image indicating a change in product placement in the vending machine for at least one product of the one or more products (para.0039- 0042; the change in placement of products inherently would be updated for the product locations). Claim 20, Lu discloses transmitting, by the image capture device (44), the at least one image to a remote device (54) to perform the image analysis; and receiving, by the vending machine controller (50), the one or more instructions to update the at least one memory from the remote device (54; since the product location data is stored in the database, the database inherently provides information for the controller to update memory and other functions). Claim 15, Lu does not disclose wherein the vending machine further includes a plurality of product gates disposed on the shelf of the vending machine, and wherein the product information includes dispensing parameters for at least one of the plurality of product gates associated with the at least one product. Hieb discloses a plurality of product gates (135) disposed on the shelf (120) of the vending machine, and wherein the product information (137) includes dispensing parameters for at least one of the plurality of product gates associated with the at least one product (para.0172). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein the vending machine further includes a plurality of product gates disposed on the shelf of the vending machine, and wherein the product information includes dispensing parameters for at least one of the plurality of product gates associated with the at least one product in order to further enhance the efficiency of the dispenser. Claim 17, Lu does not disclose wherein receiving the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform is received in response to the image analysis of the at least one image indicating an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform. Hieb discloses wherein the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform (30) is received in response to an offset of the product delivery platform (30) from a home position of the product delivery platform (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with wherein receiving the instruction to update the vertical calibration or the horizontal calibration of the product delivery platform is received in response to the image analysis of the at least one image indicating an offset of the product delivery platform from a home position of the product delivery platform in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim 19, Lu does not disclose determining the home position of the product delivery platform based on the image analysis of the at least one image indicating a change in position of the product delivery platform in relation to other objects in the vending machine. Hieb does not disclose determining the home position of the product delivery platform (30) is determined based on a change in position of the product delivery platform (30) in relation to other objects in the vending machine (para.0162-0164; checking whether element 30 is in the home position in relation to other objects in the vending machine inherently means, if it's not, element 30 would be corrected to the home position). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the device of Lu with determining the home position of the product delivery platform based on the image analysis of the at least one image indicating a change in position of the product delivery platform in relation to other objects in the vending machine in order to have a more effective and efficient sensing element component for improving the product delivery. Claim 20, Lu discloses transmitting, by the image capture device (44), the at least one image to a remote device (54) to perform the image analysis; and receiving, by the vending machine controller (50), the one or more instructions to update the at least one memory from the remote device (54; since the product location data is stored in the database, the database inherently provides information for the controller to update memory and other functions). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6,16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AYODEJI H OJOFEITIMI whose telephone number is (571)272-6557. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GENE CRAWFORD can be reached at (571) 272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AYODEJI H OJOFEITIMI/Examiner, Art Unit 3651 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed
May 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667079
Pet Treat Vending Machine
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672271
CASE AND METHOD OF USING THE CASE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672269
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT CONTAINER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12651504
ARTICLE SUPPLY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642750
MEDICATION SUPPORT DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+0.3%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month