Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/695,774

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING PLMN WITH DISASTER CONDITION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
TILAHUN, ALAZAR
Art Unit
2424
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
464 granted / 654 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
681
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§103
57.5%
+17.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 654 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Velve et al. Pub. No. US 2024/0357534 A1 (Hereinafter “Velve”). Regarding Claim 1, Velve discloses a method for determining a Public Land Mobile Network, PLMN, with disaster condition by an Access and Mobility Management Function, AMF, in a wireless network (see Abstract), comprising: receiving a registration request message from a user equipment, UE (see paragraphs [0089], [0101]); identifying that a Fifth Generation System, 5GS, registration type information element, IE, in the registration request message is set to a “disaster roaming initial registration” or a “disaster roaming mobility registration updating” (see paragraphs [0100]- [0101]); identifying whether a PLMN with disaster condition IE is included in the registration request message based on identifying that the 5GS registration type IE in the registration request message is set to the “disaster roaming initial registration” or the “disaster roaming mobility registration updating” (see paragraphs [0091], [0100], [0104]); and determining a PLMN with disaster condition in the PLMN with disaster condition IE based on identifying that the PLMN with disaster condition IE is included in the registration request message (see paragraphs [0053], [0076] and [0100]); Regarding Claim 3, Velve discloses the method as discussed in the rejection of claim 1. Velve further discloses the registration request message comprising the PLMN with disaster condition IE is received while the UE is registering for the disaster roaming service (see paragraphs [0091], [0100], [0104]). Regarding Claim 4, Velve discloses an apparatus of an Access and Mobility Management Function, AMF, for determining a Public Land Mobile Network, PLMN, with disaster condition in a wireless network (see abstract), comprising: a memory (see fig.2 and paragraph [0041]); and at least one processor coupled to the memory (see fig.2 and paragraph [0041]), wherein the processor is configured to perform the method as discussed in the rejection of claim 1. Regarding Claim 6, the claim is being analyzed with respect to the rejection of claim 3. Regarding Claim 7, the claim is directed toward embody the method of claim 1 in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one processor of an apparatus of an Access and Mobility Management Function, AMF, in a wireless network, cause the apparatus perform the method of claim 1. Regarding Claim 9, the claim is directed toward embody the method of claim 3 in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one processor of an apparatus of an Access and Mobility Management Function, AMF, in a wireless network, cause the apparatus perform the method of claim 3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2, 5 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Velve et al. Pub. No. US 2024/0357534 A1 (Hereinafter “Velve”) in view of PARK et al. et al. Pub. No. US 2023/0254733 A1 (Hereinafter “Park”). Regarding Claim 2,Velve discloses the method as discussed in the rejection of claim 1. Velve fails to disclose: based on identifying that the PLMN with disaster condition IE is not included in the registration request message, determining the PLMN with disaster condition in a PLMN identity of a fifth generation-Globally Unique Temporary Identifier, 5G-GUTI, if an additional GUTI IE is included in the registration request message, and the additional GUTI IE contains the 5G-GUTI. In analogous art, Park teaches: based on identifying that the PLMN with disaster condition IE is not included in the registration request message, determining the PLMN with disaster condition in a PLMN identity of a fifth generation-Globally Unique Temporary Identifier, 5G-GUTI, if an additional GUTI IE is included in the registration request message, and the additional GUTI IE contains the 5G-GUTI (see paragraph [0306]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Velve with the teaching as taught by Park in order to reduce an impact on a communication service of the disaster roaming PLMN. Regarding Claim 5, the claim is being analyzed with respect to the rejection of claim 2. Regarding Claim 8, the claim is directed toward embody the method of claim 2 in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one processor of an apparatus of an Access and Mobility Management Function, AMF, in a wireless network, cause the apparatus perform the method of claim 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alazar Tilahun whose telephone number is (571)270-5712. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday, From 9:00 AM-6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Bruckart can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALAZAR TILAHUN/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2424 /A.T/March 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603856
INFORMATION REPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PRODUCT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603967
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598363
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SEXUAL ENTERTAINMENT BY MONITORING TARGET ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590901
METHOD FOR INSPECTING A COATED SURFACE FOR COATING DEFECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591722
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 654 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month