Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/695,831

TRANSFER FILM AND ANTI-GLARE MOLDED BODY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Examiner
NORDMEYER, PATRICIA L
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
645 granted / 1141 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1141 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akiyama et al. (JP 2017-47594 A). A machine-generated translation of JP 2017-47594 A accompanies this action. In reciting this rejection, the examiner will cite this translation. Akiyama et al. disclose a transfer film comprising a base film and a transfer layer (Figures 1 and 6; Page 1, Abstract), wherein the transfer layer includes a surface protection layer (Figures 1 and 6, #13) and an adhesive layer (Figure 1 and 6, #15) , the surface protection layer forms a surface layer of the transfer layer facing the base film (Figure 6, #13) as in claim 1. With respect to claim 2, the base film is in contact with the surface protection layer of the transfer layer (Figure 1, #11, 12 and 13). Regarding claim 3, a surface of the surface protection layer facing the base film has a maximum height Rz of 0.5 µm or more and 3 µm or less (Page 3, lines 7 – 28). For claim 4, the surface protection layer contains a particle having an average particle size of 1 µm or more and 10 µm or less (Page 5, lines 33 – 40; Page 12, lines 6 – 8, wherein the particles of the uneven layer may be used in the protective layer). In claim 5, a primer layer between the surface protection layer and the adhesive layer (Figure 1 and 6, #14, wherein the anchor layer functions as a primer). With regard to claim 6, either one or both of the surface protection layer and the adhesive layer contain a weather resistance improving agent (Page 13, lines 6 – 9). As in claim 7, the primer layer contains a weather resistance improving agent (Page 13, lines 28 – 31, wherein the material resists high heat). With respect to claim 8, the transfer film is for transferring the transfer layer onto at least a portion of a surface of a molded body for outdoor use (Abstract, A recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. Akiyama et al. discloses a molded article made of the same materials and therefore is capable of being used outdoors.). Akiyama et al. further disclose anti-glare molded body comprising a molded body and a surface protection film disposed on at least a portion of a surface of the molded body, wherein the surface protection film is the transfer layer of the transfer film according to claim 1, and the surface protection layer of the transfer layer forms at least a portion of a surface layer of the anti-glare molded body (Abstract; Page 3, lines 24 – 29). However, Akiyama et al. fail to disclose a test piece obtained by transferring the transfer layer to a 2-mm thickness polycarbonate board has a haze of 5% or more and 30% or less, and a 60-degree specular glossiness measured for a surface of the surface protection layer of the test piece is 60% or more and 120% or less. With regard to the limitation of “a test piece obtained by transferring the transfer layer to a 2-mm thickness polycarbonate board has a haze of 5% or more and 30% or less, and a 60-degree specular glossiness measured for a surface of the surface protection layer of the test piece is 60% or more and 120% or less”, Akiyama et al. clearly discloses the claimed transfer film made from the same materials (Figures 1 and 6; Page 1, Abstract) including haze characteristics (Page 8, lines 1 – 35). Although Akiyama et al. do not explicitly teach the limitations, it is reasonable to presume that said limitations are inherent to the invention. Support for said presumption is found in the use of similar materials and in the similar production steps used to produce the transfer film. The burden is upon the Applicant to prove otherwise. MPEP 2112. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Patricia L Nordmeyer whose telephone number is (571)272-1496. The examiner can normally be reached 10am - 6:30pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Patricia L. Nordmeyer/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /pln/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 September 9, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 23, 2025
Interview Requested
Jan 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577436
EMBOSSING OR DEBOSSING OF A LABEL SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557867
ADHESIVE MOUNTABLE STACK OF REMOVABLE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552130
TRANSPARENT SOLDER MASK PROTECTION FILM, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12547210
TAPE MEMBER AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12548474
LABEL WITH STAND-UP MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+37.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month