Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/696,123

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING BEAM IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0129122 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, HAI V
Art Unit
2649
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
777 granted / 942 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
960
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
67.4%
+27.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 942 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the application filed on 27 March 2024. Claims 11, 13, 14 are cancelled Claims 1-10, 12, 15-23 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-10, 12, 15-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park et al. US patent No. 12,520,165 B2 in view of Wei et al. “Codebook design and beam training for extremely large-scale RIS: Far-field or Near-field?arXiv: 2109.10143v1 [cs.IT] 21 September 2021” as hereafter as Wei. As to claim 1, Park discloses substantially the invention as claimed, including a method of a base station (Figure 15, the Base Station) supporting beamforming in a wireless communication system (Figure 15), the method comprising: transmitting control information (synchronization/system information in a search signal 1, col. 22, lines 61-62) for controlling a plurality of reflection patterns of a Reconfiguration Intelligent Surface (RIS) (a Large Intelligent Surface (LIS)) to an RIS controller (RC) (a Large Intelligent Surface (LIS) controller) (Figures 15-17 and associated text); transmitting synchronization signals (synchronization/system information in a UE search signal 1, col. 22, lines 61-62) corresponding to a plurality of beams of the base station for each of the plurality of reflection patterns controlled based on the control information to a terminal (Figure 15, a UE) located in a shadow area (a shadowing area) via the RIS (Figures 15-17 and associated text); receiving a measurement report including a measurement result of measuring strength of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams of the base station for each of the plurality of reflection patterns from the terminal (Figures 15-17 and associated text, the Base Station receives the signal strength signals form the UE via the LIS and acquires the strongest reception signal strength from among the at least one received initial access signal, col. 26, line 1 – col. 27, line 5); selecting (acquiring) at least one beam among the plurality of beams and at least one reflection pattern among the plurality of reflection patterns as an optimal beam and an optimal reflection pattern for the shadow area, based on the measurement result included in the measurement report (Figures 15-17 and associated text, the Base Station may acquire information on the connection request message from the LIS reception beam having the highest signal strength from among the LIS reception beams for the uplink at least one received initial access signal, col. 26, line 1 – col. 27, line 5); and However, Park does not explicitly the claimed element of “generating a codebook for the RIS based on the selected optimal reflection pattern for the shadow area”. Park’s (col. 25, lines 44-50) describes that “the BS may set period, time frequency and/or code resources used for transmission of the beam search signal in the second search section in the manner that the resultant period, time, frequency, and/or code resources can be distinguished from period, time, frequency, and/or code resources for the beam search signal in the search section”. Wei disclose in Figures 1, 2, Section II-A and II-B that, “wherein in different time slots, the reflecting beaming vector θ is set as different codewords in the predefined codebook, which will equivalently produce differential beams. For each codebook, the user will measure the strength of the received signal r and feedback the optimal codework index and based on the far-field array steering vector, a far-field codebook is designed” (page 7, lines 7-24). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the AI/ML/deep learning art before the effective filing date of the claimed to have modified Wei’s teachings of the generated far-field codebook(s) with the teachings of Park’s, for the purpose of providing the reduction in beam training overhead (Wei, Abstract). As to claim 2, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the control information is transmitted once for the plurality of reflection patterns (Park, Figures 15-19 and associated text).. As to claim 3, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the control information includes at least one of timing information indicating a time point at which the terminal measures the strength of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams of the base station for each of the plurality of reflection patterns, indication information indicating each of the plurality of reflection patterns and order information indicating an order in which the plurality of reflection patterns are controlled, information about a transmission period of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams, and information indicating a number of times the transmission period of the synchronization signals is repeated for each of the plurality of reflection patterns (Park, Figures 15-21 and associated text). As to claim 4, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the control information includes at least one of timing information indicating a time point at which the terminal measures the strength of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams of the base station for each of the plurality of reflection patterns, indication information indicating each of the plurality of reflection patterns and information indicating an order in which the plurality of reflection patterns are controlled, and information indicating time at which each of the plurality of reflection patterns is controlled (Park, Figures 15-21 and associated text).. As to claim 5, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the control information is transmitted for each of the plurality of reflection patterns (Park, Figures 15-21 and associated text). As to claim 6, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the control information includes at least one of timing information indicating a time point at which the terminal measures the strength of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams of the base station for a reflection pattern corresponding to the control information, indication information indicating the reflection pattern corresponding to the control information among the plurality of reflection patterns, information about a transmission period of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams, and information indicating a number of times the transmission period of the synchronization signals is repeated for the reflection pattern corresponding to the control information (Park, Figures 15-21 and associated text). As to claim 7, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the control information includes at least one of timing information indicating a time point at which the terminal measures the strength of the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams of the base station for a reflection pattern corresponding to the control information, indication information indicating the reflection pattern corresponding to the control information among the plurality of reflection patterns, and information indicating a time at which the reflection pattern corresponding to the control information is controlled . (Park, Figures 15-21 and associated text). As to claim 8, Park-Wei discloses, wherein the measurement result includes, for each of the plurality of reflection patterns, information about at least one reflection pattern and at least one beam, which correspond to a case that strength of a signal among the synchronization signals corresponding to the plurality of beams satisfies a predetermined threshold value or more (Park, Figures 15-21 and associated text). Claims 9, 10, 15-20 correspond to the Base station claims of the BS method claims 1-8; therefore they are rejected under the same rationale as in BS method claims 1-8 above. As to claim 12, Park discloses substantially the invention as claimed, including a method of a base station (Figures 14, 15, the Base Station) supporting beamforming in a wireless communication system (Figures 14, 15), the base station comprising: a transceiver; and a controller configured to: control the transceiver to transmit control information (synchronization/system information in a search signal 1, col. 22, lines 61-62) for controlling at least one reflection pattern among a plurality of reflection patterns of a reconfiguration intelligent surface (RIS) during a predetermined time interval to an RIS controller (RC) (a Large Intelligent Surface (LIS)) to an RIS controller (RC) (a Large Intelligent Surface (LIS) controller) (Figures 15-17 and associated text), control the transceiver to transmit synchronization signals (synchronization/ system information in a UE search signal 1, col. 22, lines 61-62) corresponding to a plurality of beams of the base station for the at least one reflection pattern controlled based on the control information during the predetermined time interval to a terminal (Figures 14, 15, a UE) located at a shadow area (a shadowing area) via the RIS (Figures 15-17 and associated text), identify whether the terminal establishes a connection with the base station according to a random access procedure during the predetermined time interval (Figures 14, 17 and associated text), if the terminal establishes the connection with the base station according to the random access procedure during the predetermined time interval, identify log information associated with the random access procedure of the terminal (Figures 14, 17 and associated text), identify at least one synchronization signal for which the random access procedure is successfully performed among the plurality of synchronization signals from the log information (Figures 14, 17 and associated text), select (acquire) the at least one reflection pattern and a beam corresponding to the at least one synchronization signal among the plurality of beams as an optimal reflection pattern and an optimal beam for the shadow area, respectively (Figures 15-19 and associated text, the Base Station may acquire information on the connection request message from the LIS reception beam having the highest signal strength from among the LIS reception beams for the uplink at least one received initial access signal, col. 26, line 1 – col. 27, line 5); and Park’s (col. 25, lines 44-50) describes that “the BS may set period, time frequency and/or code resources used for transmission of the beam search signal in the second search section in the manner that the resultant period, time, frequency, and/or code resources can be distinguished from period, time, frequency, and/or code resources for the beam search signal in the search section”. Wei disclose in Figures 1, 2, Section II-A and II-B that, “wherein in different time slots, the reflecting beaming vector θ is set as different codewords in the predefined codebook, which will equivalently produce differential beams. For each codebook, the user will measure the strength of the received signal r and feedback the optimal codework index and based on the far-field array steering vector, a far-field codebook is designed” (page 7, lines 7-24). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the AI/ML/deep learning art before the effective filing date of the claimed to have modified Wei’s teachings of the generated far-field codebook(s) with the teachings of Park’s, for the purpose of providing the reduction in beam training overhead (Wei, Abstract). Claims 21; 22; 23 have similar limitations of the base station claims 3; 6; 4+7 respectively as shown above. The prior art cited in this Office action are: Park et al. US patent No. 12,520,165 B2 in view of Wei et al. “Codebook design and beam training for extremely large-scale RIS: Far-field or Near-field?arXiv: 2109.10143v1 [cs.IT] 21 September 2021” as hereafter as Wei. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAI V NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3901. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:00AM -3:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Pan can be reached at 571-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center/ for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx/ for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAI V NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634838
Methods, Apparatus, and Systems for Power Status Reporting and Power Optimized Service Configuration
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627364
Security Communicator Dual Antenna System
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628090
POWER CONSUMPTION SAVINGS BASED ON CHANNEL DELAY SPREAD REPORTING
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628053
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONDITIONAL HANDOVER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621778
POWER CONTROL FOR CARRIER AGGREGATION AND DUAL CONNECTIVITY OPERATION
3y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 942 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month