Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/696,246

METHOD PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT, AND USER EQUIPMENT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — CN 20211168893.7 +1 more
Examiner
TOWFIGHI, AFSHAWN M
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
861 granted / 982 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
988
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 982 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 2 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. First Set of Rejections Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et al (Pub. No: 2023/0084917 considering Provisional Application 63/244,861). As to claim 1, Li teaches a method performed by a user equipment (UE) (Li Provisional, Fig 3 Pg 44 Quotation 9, a method at a UE A), the method comprising: determining a resource conflict among resources reserved by respective Sidelink Control Information (SCI) formats 1-A (Li Provisional, Pg 49 Quotation 10 Pg 57 Last paragraph, detecting resource conflict for resources reserved by SCI for mats 1-A); and transmitting a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) for an indication of the resource conflict (Li Provisional Pg 44 Fig 3 Last Paragraph – Pg 45 First paragraph, transmitting a PSFCH indicating expected conflict), wherein a priority value of the PSFCH defined as a priority value for transmitting the PSFCH is equal to the smallest value among priority values indicated by the respective SCI formats 1-A (Li Provisional, Pg 49 Quotation 10 Pg 57 Last paragraph, a priority value for transmitting the PSFCH with the smallest priority value indicated in all SCI formats 1-A). As to claim 2, Li teaches a user equipment (UE), comprising: a processor; and a memory, having instructions stored therein (Li Provisional, Fig 3 Pg 44 Quotation 9, a UE with processor and memory), wherein the instructions, when run by the processor, cause the UE to: determine a resource conflict among resources reserved by respective Sidelink Control Information (SCI) formats 1-A (Li Provisional, Pg 49 Quotation 10 Pg 57 Last paragraph, detecting resource conflict for resources reserved by SCI for mats 1-A); and transmit a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) for an indication of the resource conflict (Li Provisional Pg 44 Fig 3 Last Paragraph – Pg 45 First paragraph, transmitting a PSFCH indicating expected conflict), wherein a priority value of the PSFCH defined as a priority value for transmitting the PSFCH is equal to the smallest value among priority values indicated by the respective SCI formats 1-A (Li Provisional, Pg 49 Quotation 10 Pg 57 Last paragraph, a priority value for transmitting the PSFCH with the smallest priority value indicated in all SCI formats 1-A). Second Set of Rejections Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yang et al (Pub No: 2022/0286243). As to claim 1, Yang teaches a method performed by a user equipment (UE) (Yang, [0088], a UE method), the method comprising: determining a resource conflict among resources reserved by respective Sidelink Control Information (SCI) formats 1-A (Yang, [0088], determining an overlap of resources reserved with SCI format 1-A); and transmitting a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) for an indication of the resource conflict (Yang, [0088], transmitting PSFCH indicating the overlap and priority), wherein a priority value of the PSFCH defined as a priority value for transmitting the PSFCH is equal to the smallest value among priority values indicated by the respective SCI formats 1-A (Yang, [0088], the priority value of the PFSCH is the smallest priority value of SCI format 1-A). As to claim 2, Li teaches a user equipment (UE), comprising: a processor; and a memory, having instructions stored therein (Yang, [0088], a UE) wherein the instructions, when run by the processor, cause the UE to: determine a resource conflict among resources reserved by respective Sidelink Control Information (SCI) formats 1-A (Yang, [0088], determining an overlap of resources reserved with SCI format 1-A); and transmit a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH) for an indication of the resource conflict (Yang, [0088], transmitting PSFCH indicating the overlap and priority), wherein a priority value of the PSFCH defined as a priority value for transmitting the PSFCH is equal to the smallest value among priority values indicated by the respective SCI formats 1-A (Yang, [0088], the priority value of the PFSCH is the smallest priority value of SCI format 1-A). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AFSHAWN M TOWFIGHI whose telephone number is (571)270-7296. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM -5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ian N Moore can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AFSHAWN M TOWFIGHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750195
BANDWIDTH PART-SPECIFIC DOWNLINK-UPLINK PATTERNS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745121
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745128
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY UPDATING RADIO ACCESS NETWORK CONFIGURATIONS IN CASE OF PREDICTED SERVICE DEGRADATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739190
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD FOR PROVIDING MULTICAST BROADCAST SERVICE BEARER SPLITTING
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739855
MULTI PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL (PUSCH) SCHEDULING FOR MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS (M-TRP)
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 982 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month